Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/1345263.1345322acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvaluetoolsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Level crossing ordering of Markov chains: computing end to end delays in an all optical network

Published: 22 October 2007 Publication History

Abstract

We advocate the use of level crossing ordering of Markov chains and we present two applications of this ordering to analyze the deflection routing in an all optical packet network. As optical storage of packets is not available, we assume that the routing protocol is based on deflection. This routing strategy does not allow packet loss. However it keeps the packets inside the network, increases the delay and reduces the bandwidth. Thus the transport delay distribution is the key performance issue for these networks. Here, we consider the deflection routing of a packet in a hypercube. First we assume that the deflection probability is known and we build an absorbing Markov chain to model the packet inside the network. Then we present a more abstract model of the topology and we show that under weak assumptions bounds on the deflection probability provide bounds on the end to end delay. This result is based on level-crossing comparison of Markov chains. Then we present an approximate model of the switch to obtain a fixed point system between two sub-models. The first subsystem describes the global network performance while the other one models the stochastic behavior of the packet. The fixed point system is solved by a numerical algorithm and the convergence of this algorithm is proved using again the theory of level crossing comparison of Markov chains. Proving convergence is a new application for the theory of Markov chain comparison and this example can be generalized to many algorithms based on Markov chains.

References

[1]
J. Bannister, F. Borgonovo, L. Fratta, and M. Gerla. A versatile model for predicting the performance of deflection routing networks. Performance Evaluation, 16:201--222, 1992.
[2]
P. Baran. On distributed communication networks. IEEE Transactions on Communication Systems, CS-12:1--9, 1964.
[3]
A. Bonnoni and P. P. Prucnal. Analytical evaluation of improved access techniques in deflection routing networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 4(5), 1996.
[4]
A. Borrero, J. Fourneau, and F. Quessette. Packet selection in a deflection routing algorithm. In ISCIS 2002, Orlando, USA. CRC Press, 2002.
[5]
A. Busic, J. M. Fourneau, and D. Nott. Deflection routing on a torus is monotone. In Positive Systems, Proceedings of the Second Multidisciplinary International Symposium on Positive Systems: Theory and Applications (POSTA 06), volume 341 of LNCIS, pages 161--168. Springer, 2006.
[6]
J. Fabrega and X. Munoz. A study of network capacity under deflection routing schemes. In Europar 03, volume 2790 of LNCS, pages 989--994, 2003.
[7]
F. Ferreira and A. Pacheco. Level-crossing ordering of semi-Markov processes and Markov chains. Journal of Applied Probability, 42:989--1002, 2005.
[8]
J.-M. Fourneau and T. Czachórski. Transport time distribution for deflection routing on an odd torus. In Europar 05, Portugal, volume 3648 of LNCS, pages 975--983. Springer Verlag, 2005.
[9]
P. Gravey, S. Gosselin, C. Guillemot, D. Chiaroni, N. L. Sauze, A. Jourdan, E. Dotaro, D. Barth, P. Berthomé, C. Laforest, S. Vial, T. Atmaca, G. Hébuterne, H. E. Biaze, R. Laalaoua, E. Gangloff, and I. Kotuliak. Multiservice optical network: Main concepts and first achievements of the ROM program. Journal of Ligthwave Technology, 19:23--31, 2001.
[10]
A. Irle and J. Gani. The detection of words and an ordering for Markov chains. Journal of Applied Probability, 38:66--77, 2001.
[11]
S. Mneimeh and F. Quessette. Minimum deflection routing algorithm, alcatel patent application #135945, 2002.
[12]
D. Stoyan. Comparison Methods for Queues and Other Stochastic Models. Wiley, 1983.
[13]
K. S. Trivedi. Probability and Statistic with Reliability, Queueing and Computer Science Applications, Second Edition. Wiley, 2002.
[14]
S. Yao, B. Mukherjee, and S. Dixit. Plato: a generic modeling technique for optical packet switched networks. International Journal on Wireless and Optical Communications, 1(1):91--101, 2003.

Cited By

View all
  • (2008)A Lyapunov-Krasovskii stability analysis for game-theoretic based power control in optical networksProceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools10.4108/ICST.VALUETOOLS2008.4340(1-10)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2008

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ValueTools '07: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Performance evaluation methodologies and tools
October 2007
708 pages
ISBN:9789639799004

Sponsors

Publisher

ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering)

Brussels, Belgium

Publication History

Published: 22 October 2007

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. deflection routing
  2. end to end delay
  3. level crossing comparison of Markov chains
  4. stochastic ordering

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

Valuetools07

Acceptance Rates

ValueTools '07 Paper Acceptance Rate 45 of 83 submissions, 54%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 90 of 196 submissions, 46%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2008)A Lyapunov-Krasovskii stability analysis for game-theoretic based power control in optical networksProceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools10.4108/ICST.VALUETOOLS2008.4340(1-10)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2008

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media