Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2809890.2809895acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Efficient Top-k Query Answering through its Top-N Rewritings Using Views

Published: 18 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Recently, various algorithms were proposed to speed up top-k query answering by using multiple materialized query results. Nevertheless, for most of the proposed algorithms, a potentially costly view selection operation is required. In fact, the processing cost has been shown to be linear with respect to the number of views and can be exorbitant given the large number of views to be considered. In this paper, we address the problem of identifying the top-N promising views to use for top-k query answering in the presence of a collection of views. We propose a novel algorithm, for handling this problem, which aims to achieve significant reduction in query execution time. Indeed, it considers minimal amount of rewritings that are likely necessary to return the top-k tuples for a top-k query. We consider, also, the problem of how to efficiently exploit the output of the rewritings algorithm to retrieve the top-k tuples through two possible solutions. The results of a thorough experimental study indicate that the proposed algorithm offers a robust solution to the problem of efficient top-k query answering using views since it discards non-promising query rewritings from the view selection process.

References

[1]
Pottinger, R., and Levy, A. Y. 2000. A scalable algorithm for answering queries using views. In Proceedings of the 26th VLDB Conference (Cairo, Egypt, 2000), 484--495.
[2]
Ilyas, I. F., Beskales, G., and Soliman, M. A. 2008. A survey of top-k query processing techniques in relational database systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 40, 4 (Oct. 2008).
[3]
Hristidis, V., and Papakonstantinou, Y. 2004. Algorithms and applications for answering ranked queries using ranked views. J. VLDB. 13, 1 (Jan. 2004), 49--70.
[4]
Das, G., Gunopulos, D., Koudas, N., and Tsirogiannis, D. 2006. Answering top-k queries using views. In Proceedings of the 32nd VLDB Conference (Seoul, Korea, 2006), 451--462.
[5]
Baikousi, E., and Vassiliadis, P. 2009. View usability and safety for the answering of top-k queries via materialized views. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Workshop on DOLAP (Hong Kong, China, November 6, 2009), 97--104.
[6]
Hristidis, V., Koudas, N., and Papakonstantinou, Y. 2001. PREFER: A system for the efficient execution of multi-parametric ranked queries. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data (Santa Barbara, California, USA), 259--270.
[7]
Xie, M., Lakshmanan, L.V.S., and Wood, P. T. 2013. Efficient top-k query answering using cached views. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on EDBT (Genoa, Italy, March 18-22, 2013), 489--500.
[8]
Ryeng, N. H., Vlachou, A., Doulkeridis, C., and Nørvåg, K. 2011. Efficient distributed top-k query processing with caching. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on DASFAA (Hong Kong, China, April 22 - 25, 2011), 280--295.
[9]
Bosc, P., and Prade, H. 1997. An Introduction to the treatment of flexible queries and uncertain or imprecise databases. In Uncertainty Management in Information Systems, A. Motro, P. Smets, Ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 285--324.
[10]
Bosc, P., Hadjali, A., Jaudoin, H., and Pivert, O. 2007. Flexible querying of multiple data sources through fuzzy summaries. In Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on DEXA (Regensburg, Germany, September 3 - 7, 2007), 350--354.
[11]
Hadjali, A., and Pivert, O. 2008. Towards fuzzy query answering using fuzzy views - A graded-subsumption-based approach. In Proceedings of the 17th Symposium on ISMIS (Toronto, Canada, May 20 - 23, 2008). ISMIS '08. LNAI, 4994,268--277.
[12]
Jaudoin, H., and Pivert, O. 2011. Rewriting fuzzy queries using imprecise views. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on ADBIS (Vienna, Austria, September 20 - 23, 2011). ADBIS '11. LNCS, 6909, 257--270.
[13]
Jaudoin, H., Colomb, P., and Pivert, O. 2009. Ranking approximate query rewritings based on views. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on FQAS (Roskilde, Denmark, October 26 - 28, 2009). FQAS '09. LNAI, 5822, 13--24.
[14]
Fagin, R., Lotem, A., and Naor, M. 2001. Optimal aggregation algorithms for middleware. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS, 2001), 102--113.
[15]
Zhao, K., Tao, Y., and Zhou, S. 2007. Efficient top-k processing in large-scaled distributed environments. Data and Knowledge Engineering 63, 2 (Nov. 2007), 315--335. DOI= http://
[16]
Halevy, A. Y. 2001. Answering queries using views: A survey. J. VLDB. 10, 4, (Dec. 2002), 270--294.
[17]
Guntzer, U. 2003. Optimizing multifeature queries in image databases. In Proceedings of the 26th VLDB Conference (Cairo, Egypt, 2000), 419--428.
[18]
Ramakrishna, M. V., and Nepal, S. 1996. Query processing issues in image (Multimedia) databases. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Data Engineering (Sydney, NSW, March 23-26, 1999), 22--29. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.1999.754894.
[19]
Das, G., Gunopulos, D., Koudas, N., and Sarkas, N. 2007. Ad-hoc top-k query answering for data streams. In Proceedings of the 33rd VLDB Conference (Vienna, Austria, September 23 - 28, 2007), 183--194.
[20]
Yu, A., Agarwal, P. K., and Yang, J. 2012. Processing a large number of continuous preference top-k queries. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data. SIGMOD '12. ACM, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, 397--408.
[21]
Baseball statistics. DOI= http://www.databaseBaseball.com.

Index Terms

  1. Efficient Top-k Query Answering through its Top-N Rewritings Using Views

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    PIKM '15: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Ph.D. Workshop in Information and Knowledge Management
    October 2015
    54 pages
    ISBN:9781450337823
    DOI:10.1145/2809890
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 October 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. query optimization
    2. top-k query answering using materialized views
    3. top-k query processing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CIKM'15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    PIKM '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 5 of 16 submissions, 31%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 25 of 62 submissions, 40%

    Upcoming Conference

    CIKM '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 74
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media