Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/3324320.3324328acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesewsnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Bursting: Increasing Energy Efficiency of Erasure-Coded Data in Animal-Borne Sensor Networks

Published: 15 March 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Observing the (social) behavior of animals and especially bats contributes to improved epidemic forecasts and improved protection of rare or endangered species. For this task, animal-borne sensor nodes are powerful tools since they allow collecting more information at less influence to the species compared to traditional radio telemetry. However, as bats are inherently small vertebrates, a strict weight limit of 2 g is dictated for attached sensor nodes. To acquire enough data, the sensor nodes must achieve a runtime of at least two weeks, which demands a rigorous energy management. As the data transmission is the most energy hungry task, minimizing the energy demand in this segment is a key to achieve the desired runtimes. In this paper we present a novel technique that enables bursts of erasure coded data without sacrificing reliability (in a wildlife setting). To keep data losses at a minimum, our approach exploits the characteristics of the erasure channel and combines encoded packets in smart way. We evaluated this approach extensively with experiments, field tests and a theoretical analysis. The results show a decreased energy demand by 30.177 % to 36.951 % while the data rate is increased up to a factor of 4 at the same time.

References

[1]
I. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci. Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Computer Networks, 38(4):393 – 422, 2002.
[2]
S. Amelon, D. Dalton, J. Millspaugh, and S. Wolf. Radiotelemetry: Techniques and analysis. In Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats. 2009.
[3]
J. Blömer, M. Kalfane, R. Karp, M. Karpinski, M. Luby, and D. Zuckerman. An xor-based erasure-resilient coding scheme, 1995.
[4]
B. Cassens, S. Ripperger, M. Hierold, F. Mayer, and R. Kapitza. Automated encounter detection for animal-borne sensor nodes. International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks (EWSN), 2017.
[5]
F. R. Dogar, P. Steenkiste, and K. Papagiannaki. Catnap: Exploiting high bandwidth wireless interfaces to save energy for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, MobiSys ’10, pages 107–122, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[6]
F. Dressler, M. Mutschlechner, B. Li, R. Kapitza, S. Ripperger, C. Eibel, B. Herzog, T. Hönig, and W. Schröder-Preikschat. Monitoring Bats in the Wild: On Using Erasure Codes for Energy-Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), 2016.
[7]
F. Dressler, S. Ripperger, M. Hierold, T. Nowak, C. Eibel, B. Cassens, F. Mayer, K. Meyer-Wegener, and A. Koelpin. From Radio Telemetry to Ultra-Low Power Sensor Networks Tracking Bats in the Wild. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2015.
[8]
A. Groseth, H. Feldmann, and J. E. Strong. The ecology of ebola virus. Trends in Microbiology, 15(9):408 – 416, 2007.
[9]
I. I. Levin, D. M. Zonana, J. M. Burt, and R. J. Safran. Performance of encounternet tags: field tests of miniaturized proximity loggers for use on small birds. PloS one, 2015.
[10]
G. F. McCracken, K. Safi, T. H. Kunz, D. K. N. Dechmann, S. M. Swartz, and M. Wikelski. Airplane tracking documents the fastest flight speeds recorded for bats. Royal Society Open Science, 3(11), 2016.
[11]
M. Mutschlechner, F. Klingler, F. Erlacher, F. Hagenauer, M. Kiessling, and F. Dressler. Reliable communication using erasure codes for monitoring bats in the wild. In IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2014.
[12]
M. Mutschlechner, B. Li, R. Kapitza, and F. Dressler. Using erasure codes to overcome reliability issues in energy-constrained sensor networks. In 11th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), 2014.
[13]
X. Ning and C. G. Cassandras. Message batching in wireless sensor networks—a perturbation analysis approach. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 2010.
[14]
T. Nowak, M. Hartmann, T. Zech, and J. Thielecke. A path loss and fading model for rssi-based localization in forested areas. In IEEEAPS Topical Conference on Antennas and Propagation in Wireless Communications (IEEE-APWC 2016), 2016.
[15]
F. Ossi, S. Focardi, G. P. Picco, A. Murphy, D. Molteni, B. Tolhurst, N. Giannini, J.-M. Gaillard, and F. Cagnacci. Understanding and georeferencing animal contacts: proximity sensor networks integrated with gps-based telemetry. Animal Biotelemetry, 2016.
[16]
J. S. Plank, J. Luo, C. D. Schuman, L. Xu, and Z. Wilcox-O’Hearn. A performance evaluation and examination of open-source erasure coding libraries for storage. In 7th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST 09), San Francisco, CA, 2009. USENIX Association.
[17]
J. Proakis. Digital communications. McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2008.
[18]
Silabs. EFR32FG1 Flex Gecko Proprietary Protocol SoC Family Data Sheet, 2017. EFR32FG1P133F256GM48, Revision 1.2 (2017).
[19]
P. Sommer, J. Liu, K. Zhao, B. Kusy, R. Jurdak, A. McKeown, and D. Westcott. Information bang for the energy buck: Towards energyand mobility-aware tracking. In International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, EWSN ’16, 2016.
[20]
T. van Dam and K. Langendoen. An adaptive energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys ’03, pages 171–180, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM.
[21]
K. Vieira Cardoso and J. de Rezende. Accurate hidden markov modeling of packet losses in indoor 802.11 networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 2009.
[22]
P. Zhang, C. M. Sadler, S. A. Lyon, and M. Martonosi. Hardware design experiences in zebranet. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys, 2004.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
EWSN '19: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks
February 2019
436 pages
ISBN:9780994988638

Sponsors

  • EWSN: International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Junction Publishing

United States

Publication History

Published: 15 March 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Animal tracking
  2. Communication
  3. Energy-aware systems
  4. Firmware
  5. Wireless sensor networks

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 81 of 195 submissions, 42%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 0
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media