Current perspectives on the software engineering process
Abstract
This volume comprises a selected set of high‐quality and extended articles of the 26th Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI) Conference, held during September 18–20, 2019 in Edinburgh, UK. Conferences were held in Dublin (Ireland) in 1994, in Vienna (Austria) in 1995, in Brighton (UK) in 1996, in Budapest (Hungary) in 1997, in Gothenburg (Sweden) in 1998, in Pori (Finland) in 1999, in Copenhagen (Denmark) in 2000, in Limerick (Ireland) in 2001, in Nuremberg (Germany) in 2002, in Graz (Austria) in 2003, in Trondheim (Norway) in 2004, in Budapest (Hungary) in 2005, in Joensuu (Finland) in 2006, in Potsdam (Germany) in 2007, in Dublin (Ireland) in 2008, in Alcala (Spain) in 2009, in Grenoble (France) in 2010, in Roskilde (Denmark) in 2011, in Vienna (Austria) in 2012, in Dundalk (Ireland) in 2013, in Luxembourg in 2014, in Ankara (Turkey) in 2015, in Graz (Austria) in 2016, in Ostrava (Czech Republic) in 2017, in Bilbao (Spain) in 2018, and in Edinburgh (UK) in 2019.
References
[1]
Breske E, Schweigert T. The SPI manifesto revisited. In: Stolfa J, Stolfa S, O'Connor RV, Messnarz R, eds. Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017:401‐410. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_33
[2]
Korsaa M, Biro M, Messnarz R, et al. The SPI manifesto and the ECQA SPI manager certification scheme. J Softw Evol Process. 2012;24(5):525‐540. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.502
[3]
Messnarz R, Sicilia M‐A, Biro M, et al. Social responsibility aspects supporting the success of SPI. J Softw Evol Process. 2014;26(3):284‐294. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1586
[4]
Larrucea X, O'Connor RV, Colomo‐Palacios R, Laporte CY. Software process improvement in very small organizations. IEEE Softw. 2016;33(2):85‐89. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2016.42
[5]
Zarour M, Abran A, Desharnais J‐M, Alarifi A. An investigation into the best practices for the successful design and implementation of lightweight software process assessment methods: a systematic literature review. J Syst Softw. 2015;101:180‐192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.11.041
[6]
O'Connor RV, Laporte CY. The evolution of the ISO/IEC 29110 set of standards and guides. Int J Inf Technol Syst Approach IJITSA. 2017;10(1):1‐21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJITSA.2017010101
[7]
Muñoz M, Mejia J, Peña A, Lara G, Laporte CY. Transitioning international software engineering standards to academia: Analyzing the results of the adoption of ISO/IEC 29110 in four Mexican universities. Comput Stand Interfaces. 2019;66:103340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2019.03.008
[8]
Castillo‐Salinas L, Sanchez‐Gordon S, Villarroel‐Ramos J, Sánchez‐Gordón M. Evaluation of the implementation of a subset of ISO/IEC 29110 software implementation process in four teams of undergraduate students of Ecuador. An empirical software engineering experiment. Comput Stand Interfac. 2020;70:103430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2020.103430
[9]
Bures T, Weyns D, Schmerl B, et al. Software engineering for smart cyber‐physical systems (SEsCPS 2018)—workshop report. ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes. 2019;44(4):11‐13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364452.3364465
[10]
Biffl S, Eckhart M, Lüder A, Weippl E. Introduction to security and quality improvement in complex cyber‐physical systems engineering. In: Biffl S, Eckhart M, Lüder A, Weippl E, eds. Security and Quality in Cyber‐Physical Systems Engineering. Forewords Robert M Lee Tom Gilb. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019:1‐29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25312-7_1
[11]
Lao L, Li Z, Hou S, Xiao B, Guo S, Yang Y. A survey of IoT applications in Blockchain systems: architecture, consensus, and traffic modeling. ACM Comput Surv. 2020;53:18:1‐18:32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372136
[12]
Kolb J, AbdelBaky M, Katz RH, Culler DE. Core concepts, challenges, and future directions in Blockchain: a centralized tutorial. ACM Comput Surv. 2020;53:9:1‐9:39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366370
[13]
Beller M, Hejderup J. Blockchain‐based software engineering. Proc. 41st Int. Conf. Softw. Eng. New Ideas Emerg. Results, Montreal, Quebec, Canada: IEEE Press; 2019:53‐56. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-NIER.2019.00022
[14]
Porru S, Pinna A, Marchesi M, Tonelli R. Blockchain‐oriented software engineering: challenges and new directions. 2017 IEEEACM 39th Int. Conf. Softw. Eng. Companion ICSE‐C, 2017:169‐171. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-C.2017.142
[15]
Hornik K. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. WIREs Comput Stat. 2012;4(4):394‐398. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1212
[16]
Russo D, Stol K‐J. Gender differences in personality traits of software engineers. IEEE Trans Softw Eng (Early Access). 2020:1‐1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.3003413
[17]
Cruz S, da Silva FQB, Capretz LF. Forty years of research on personality in software engineering: a mapping study. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;46:94‐113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.008
[18]
Biró M, Tully C. The software process in the context of business goals and performance. In: Messnarz R, Tully C, eds. Chapter in the book entitled "Better Software Practice for Business Benefit". Washington, Brussels, Tokyo: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1999. ISBN 0‐7695‐0049‐8. https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/553766
[19]
Kosti MV, Feldt R, Angelis L. Personality, emotional intelligence and work preferences in software engineering: an empirical study. Inf Softw Technol. 2014;56(8):973‐990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.03.004
[20]
Vishnubhotla SD, Mendes E, Lundberg L. Investigating the relationship between personalities and agile team climate of software professionals in a telecom company. Inf Softw Technol. 2020;126:106335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106335
[21]
Yilmaz M, O'Connor RV, Colomo‐Palacios R, Clarke P. An examination of personality traits and how they impact on software development teams. Inf Softw Technol. 2017;86:101‐122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.01.005
[22]
Biró M, Colomo‐Palacios R, Messnarz R. Addressing evolving requirements faced by the software industry. J Softw Evol Proc. 2020;32(3):e2237. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2237
[23]
Biró M, Colomo‐Palacios R, Messnarz R. Advances in system, software and service process improvement and innovation. J Softw Evol Proc. 2019;31(1):e2146. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2146
[24]
Mashkoor A, Biró M, Messnarz R, Colomo‐Palacios R. Selected functional safety and cybersecurity concerns in system, software, and service process improvement and innovation. J Softw Evol Proc. 2018;30(5):e1955. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1955
[25]
Biró M, Messnarz R, Colomo‐Palacios R. Results and lessons learned in System, Software & Service Process Improvement & Innovation. J Softw Evol Proc. 2016;28(11):946‐949. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1833
[26]
Biró M, Messnarz R, Colomo‐Palacios R. Process improvement approaches fertilised by advances in SPI. J Softw Evol And Proc. 2015;27(8):509‐513. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1725
[27]
Biró M, Messnarz R, Colomo‐Palacios R. Snapshot of industrial experiences shared at the 20th anniversary EuroSPI conference. J Softw Evol and Proc. 2014;26(9):771‐775. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1677
Index Terms
- Current perspectives on the software engineering process
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Global challenges reflected in software process improvement
AbstractThis special issue comprises a selected set of high‐quality and extended articles of the 28th Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI) Conference, held in 2021 in Krems, Austria.
Conferences were held in Dublin (Ireland) in 1994,...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
United States
Publication History
Published: 10 November 2020
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in