Perception of Virtual Agents as Communicators in Virtual vs. Augmented Reality by a Male Sample
Pages 36 - 49
Abstract
Virtual agents are often employed in persuasive applications, and different studies in the literature have shown that the gender of the agent may have an impact on how users perceive the agent as a communicator. This paper adds a new variable to this line of research, considering the possible effects of presenting the agent in Virtual Reality (VR) vs. Augmented Reality (AR). We measured attentional allocation, perceived affective understanding, speaker credibility and speaker strength. While attentional allocation was the same in all conditions, an interesting pattern emerged for the other variables. The transition from VR to AR apparently changed the perception of some communicator aspects to the advantage of the female virtual agent. We also found associations between participants’ personality traits (in particular, extraversion) and perception of the agent. The paper describes and discusses these findings.
References
[1]
Johnson AM, DiDonato MD, and Reisslein M Animated agents in K-12 engineering outreach: Preferred agent characteristics across age levels Comput. Hum. Behav. 2013 29 4 1807-1815
[2]
Ashby Plant, E., Baylor, A. L., Doerr, C. E., Rosenberg-Kima, R. B.: Changing middle-school students’ attitudes and performance regarding engineering with computer-based social models, Comput. Educ., 53(2), pp. 209–215 (2009)
[3]
Buttussi F and Chittaro L Humor and Fear Appeals in Animated Pedagogical Agents: An Evaluation in Aviation Safety Education IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2020 13 1 63-76
[4]
Tielman ML, Neerincx MA, and Brinkman W-P Design and Evaluation of Personalized Motivational Messages by a Virtual Agent that Assists in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Therapy J. Med. Internet Res. 2019 21 3
[5]
Parmar D, Olafsson S, Utami D, Murali P, and Bickmore T Designing empathic virtual agents: manipulating animation, voice, rendering, and empathy to create persuasive agents Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 2022 36 1 17
[6]
Ruijten PAM, Midden CJH, and Ham J Lonely and Susceptible: The Influence of Social Exclusion and Gender on Persuasion by an Artificial Agent Int. J. Human-Computer Interact. 2015 31 11 832-842
[7]
Verberne FMF, Ham J, Ponnada A, and Midden CJH Berkovsky S and Freyne J Trusting Digital Chameleons: The Effect of Mimicry by a Virtual Social Agent on User Trust Persuasive Technology 2013 Heidelberg Springer 234-245
[8]
Roubroeks M, Ham J, and Midden C When Artificial Social Agents Try to Persuade People: The Role of Social Agency on the Occurrence of Psychological Reactance Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2011 3 2 155-165
[9]
Midden, C., Ham, J.: Using negative and positive social feedback from a robotic agent to save energy In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, New York, NY, USA, (2009), pp. 1–6.
[10]
Fountoukidou S, Ham J, Matzat U, and Midden C Effects of an artificial agent as a behavioral model on motivational and learning outcomes Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019 97 84-93
[11]
Ruijten PAM, Midden CJH, and Ham J Ambiguous Agents: The Influence of Consistency of an Artificial Agent’s Social Cues on Emotion Recognition, Recall, and Persuasiveness Int. J. Human-Computer Interact. 2016 32 9 734-744
[12]
Ruijten PAM, Midden CJH, and Ham J Berkovsky S and Freyne J I Didn’t Know That Virtual Agent Was Angry at Me: Investigating Effects of Gaze Direction on Emotion Recognition and Evaluation Persuasive Technology 2013 Heidelberg Springer 192-197
[13]
Biocca, F.: The Cyborg’s Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments [1] J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun., 3 (2), p. JCMC324, (1997)
[14]
Fogg, B. J., Tseng, H.: The elements of computer credibility,” In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, Maggio, pp. 80–87 (1999)
[15]
Lee KM, Jung Y, Kim J, and Kim SR Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human–robot interaction Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2006 64 10 962-973
[16]
Makransky G, Wismer P, and Mayer RE A gender matching effect in learning with pedagogical agents in an immersive virtual reality science simulation J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2019 35 3 349-358
[17]
Qiu L and Benbasat I A study of demographic embodiments of product recommendation agents in electronic commerce Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2010 68 10 669-688
[18]
Nunamaker JF, Derrick DC, Elkins AC, Burgoon JK, and Patton MW Embodied Conversational Agent-Based Kiosk for Automated Interviewing J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2011 28 1 17-48
[19]
Ozogul G, Johnson AM, Atkinson RK, and Reisslein M Investigating the impact of pedagogical agent gender matching and learner choice on learning outcomes and perceptions Comput. Educ. 2013 67 36-50
[20]
Rosenberg-Kima RB, Plant EA, Doerr CE, and Baylor AL The Influence of Computer-based Model’s Race and Gender on Female Students’ Attitudes and Beliefs Towards Engineering J. Eng. Educ. 2010 99 1 35-44
[21]
Guadagno R, Blascovich J, Bailenson J, and McCall C Virtual Humans and Persuasion: The Effects of Agency and Behavioral Realism Media Psychol. 2007 10 1-22
[22]
Gulz A, Ahlner F, and Haake M Paiva ACR, Prada R, and Picard RW Visual Femininity and Masculinity in Synthetic Characters and Patterns of Affect Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction 2007 Heidelberg Springer 654-665
[23]
Ter Stal, S., Tabak, M., op den Akker, H., Beinema, T., Hermens, H.: Who Do You Prefer? The Effect of Age, Gender and Role on Users’ First Impressions of Embodied Conversational Agents in eHealth. Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., 36(9), pp. 881–892 (2020)
[24]
Bailenson JN and Yee N Digital Chameleons: Automatic Assimilation of Nonverbal Gestures in Immersive Virtual Environments Psychol. Sci. 2005 16 10 814-819
[25]
Casasanto D, Casasanto LS, Gijssels T, and Hagoort P The Reverse Chameleon Effect: Negative Social Consequences of Anatomical Mimicry Front. Psychol. 2020 11 1876
[26]
Stein J-P and Ohler P Uncanny But Convincing? Inconsistency Between a Virtual Agent’s Facial Proportions and Vocal Realism Reduces Its Credibility and Attractiveness, but Not Its Persuasive Success Interact. Comput. 2018 30 6 480-491
[27]
Wang, I., Smith, J., Ruiz, J.: Exploring Virtual Agents for Augmented Reality. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow Scotland Uk, pp. 1–12. (2019)
[28]
Huang, A., Knierim, P., Chiossi, F., Chuang, L. L., Welsch, R.: Proxemics for Human-Agent Interaction in Augmented Reality In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans LA USA, pp. 1–13. (2022)
[29]
Miller, M.R., Jun, H., Herrera, F., Villa, J.Y., Welch, G., Bailenson, J. N.: Social interaction in augmented reality, PLOS ONE, 14(5), p. e0216290 (2019)
[30]
Chartrand TL and Bargh JA The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1999 76 893-910
[31]
Gonzalez-Franco M et al. The Rocketbox Library and the Utility of Freely Available Rigged Avatars Front. Virtual Real. 2020 1
[32]
Andre, E., et al.: Non-verbal Persuasion and Communication in an Affective Agent. In: Cognitive Technologies, pp. 585–608 (2011)
[33]
Soto CJ and John OP Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS J. Res. Personal. 2017 68 69-81
[34]
Harms C and Biocca F “Internal Consistency and Reliability of the Networked Minds Measure of Social Presence”, presented at the Seventh annual international workshop: Presence Valencia, Spain 2004 2004 8
[35]
Stern SE, Mullennix JW, and Yaroslavsky I Persuasion and social perception of human vs. synthetic voice across person as source and computer as source conditions Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2006 64 1 43-52
[36]
Cohen, B. H.: Explaining Psychological Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, (2008)
[37]
Milgram, P., Kishino, F.: A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst., E77-D, (12), pp. 1321–1329, (1994)
[38]
Kenton, S. B.: Speaker Credibility in Persuasive Business Communication: A Model Which Explains Gender Differences. J. Bus. Commun., 26(2), pp. 143–157, Spring 1989,
[39]
Fishman I, Ng R, and Bellugi U Do extraverts process social stimuli differently from introverts? Cogn. Neurosci. 2011 2 2 67-73
[40]
Akert RM and Panter AT Extraversion and the ability to decode nonverbal communication Personal. Individ. Differ. 1988 9 6 965-972
Recommendations
Extending Virtual Reality Display Wall Environments Using Augmented Reality
SUI '19: Symposium on Spatial User InteractionTwo major form factors for virtual reality are head-mounted displays and large display environments such as CAVE®and the LCD-based successor CAVE2®. Each of these has distinct advantages and limitations based on how they’re used. This work explores ...
Speed reading on virtual reality and augmented reality
AbstractMany virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) applications in education require speed reading. The current study aimed to explore whether the reading performance on VR and AR is different from that on traditional desktop display,...
Highlights- We explored performance of speed reading on virtual and augmented reality.
- ...
Multi-sensorial virtual reality and augmented human food interaction
MHFI '16: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Multi-sensorial Approaches to Human-Food InteractionIn the field of virtual reality (VR) research, media technologies to create a realistic feeling of being present in a real/virtual world by duplicating multi-sensory information have been studied over a long period. Recently, technologies for multi-...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Apr 2023
434 pages
ISBN:978-3-031-30932-8
DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-30933-5
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023.
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Berlin, Heidelberg
Publication History
Published: 19 April 2023
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in