Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Cyber and physical interactions to combat failure propagation in smart grid: : Characterization, analysis and evaluation

Published: 20 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The smart grid is envisioned to use a cyber-physical network paradigm to prevent failures from propagating along large-scale infrastructures, which is a primary cause for massive blackouts. Despite this promising vision, how effective cyber and physical interactions are against failure propagation is not yet fully investigated. In this paper, we use analysis and system-level simulations to characterize such interactions during load shedding, which is a process to stop failure propagation by shedding a computed amount of loads based on collaborative communication. Specifically, we model failures, such as system fault, happening in the physical domain as a counting process, with each count triggering a load shedding action in the cyber domain. Although global load shedding design is considered optimal by globally coordinating shedding actions, its induced failure probability (defined as the one that at least a given number of power lines fail) is shown scalable to the delay performance and the system size. This indicates that global load shedding is less likely to stop failure propagation in large systems than local shedding that sheds loads within a limited system scope. Our study demonstrates that a joint view on cyber and physical factors is essential for failure prevention design in the smart grid.

References

[1]
H. Farhangi, The path of the smart grid, IEEE Power Energy Mag. 8 (2010) 18–28.
[2]
X. Fang, S. Misra, G. Xue, D. Yang, Smart grid - the new and improved power grid: a survey, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 14 (2012) 944–980.
[3]
W. Wang, Y. Xu, M. Khanna, A survey on the communication architectures in smart grid, Comput. Netw. 55 (2011).
[4]
A. Bernstein, D. Bienstock, D. Hay, M. Uzunoglu, G. Zussman, Power grid vulnerability to geographically correlated failures - analysis and control implications, IEEE INFOCOM, 2014.
[5]
O. Yagan, D. Qian, J. Zhang, D. Cochran, Optimal allocation of interconnecting links in cyber-physical systems: interdependence, cascading failures, and robustness, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 23 (2012) 1708–1720.
[6]
H. Xiao, E.M. Yeh, Cascading link failure in the power grid: apercolation-based analysis, IEEE ICC, 2011.
[7]
J. Yan, Y. Zhu, H. He, Y. Sun, Multi-contingency cascading analysis of smart grid based on self-organizing map, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forens. Secur. 8 (2013) 646–656.
[8]
J. Minkel, The 2003 northeast blackout - five years later, Sci. Am. 13 (2008).
[9]
J.-W. Wang, L.-L. Rong, Cascade-based attack vulnerability on the US power grid, Safety Science 47 (2009) 1332–1336.
[10]
P. Pourbeik, P.S. Kundur, C.W. Taylor, The anatomy of a power grid blackout, IEEE Power Energy Mag. 4 (2006).
[11]
M. Sechilariu, B. Wang, F. Locment, Building integrated photovoltaic system with energy storage and smart grid communication, IEEE Trans. Indus. Electron. 60 (2013) 1607–1618.
[12]
H. You, V. Vittal, Z. Yang, Self-healing in power systems: an approach using islanding and rate of frequency decline-based load shedding, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 18 (2003) 174–181.
[13]
I. Dobson, B. Carreras, V. Lynch, D. Newman, Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization, Chaos 17 (2007).
[14]
A. Das, J. Banerjee, A. Sen, Root cause analysis of failures in interdependent power-communication networks, IEEE MILCOM, 2014, pp. 910–915.
[15]
J. Yan, Y. Tang, H. He, Y. Sun, Cascading failure analysis with DC power flow model and transient stability analysis, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30 (1) (2015) 285–297.
[16]
D. Xu, A.A. Girgis, Optimal load shedding strategy in power systems with distributed generation, IEEE PES Winter Meeting, 2001.
[17]
Underfrequency Load Shedding2006Assessment and Review [Online]. Available: http://www.ercot.com.
[18]
W. Wang, Z. Lu, Cyber security in the smart grid: survey and challenges, Comput. Netw. 57 (2013) 1344–1371.
[19]
S.V. Buldyrev, R. Parshani, G. Paul, H.E. Stanley, S. Havlin, Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks, Nature 464 (7291) (2010) 1025–1028.
[20]
A. Bashan, Y. Berezin, S.V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, The extreme vulnerability of interdependent spatially embedded networks, Nature Phys. 9 (10) (2013) 667–672.
[21]
F. Roberts, B. Tesman, Applied Combinatorics, CRC Press, 2009.
[22]
S. Mei, F. He, X. Zhang, S. Wu, G. Wang, An improved opa model and blackout risk assessment, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24 (2) (2009) 814–823,.
[23]
S. Mei, X. Zhang, M. Cao, Power Grid Complexity, Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
[24]
P.P. Marino, Optimization of Computer Networks: Modeling and Algorithms: a Hands-on Approach, John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
[25]
Y. Wang, M.C. Vuran, S. Goddard, Cross-layer analysis of the end-to-end delay distribution in wireless sensor networks, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 20 (2012) 305–318.
[26]
D.J. Watts, S.H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of small-world networks, Nature 393 (6684) (1998) 440–442.
[27]
M.J. Neely, E. Modiano, Capacity and delay tradeoffs for ad hoc mobile networks, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51 (2005).
[29]
P. Crucitti, V. Latora, M. Marchiori, A topological analysis of the italian electric power grid, Phys. A 338 (1) (2004) 92–97.
[30]
D.P. Nedic, I. Dobson, D.S. Kirschen, B.A. Carreras, V.E. Lynch, Criticality in a cascading failure blackout model, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 28 (2006) 627–633.
[31]
R. Yao, S. Huang, K. Sun, F. Liu, X. Zhang, S. Mei, A multi-timescale quasi-dynamic model for simulation of cascading outages, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31 (4) (2016) 3189–3201,.
[32]
J.-C. Bolot, Characterizing end-to-end packet delay and loss in the internet, J. High Speed Netw. 2 (3) (1993) 305–323.
[33]
J.J. Grainger, W.D. Stevenson, W.D. Stevenson, et al., 2003.
[34]
N.P.A. Plan, 2-guidelines for assessing wireless standards for smart grid applications, Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Std. (2011).
[35]
P.P. Parikh, M.G. Kanabar, T.S. Sidhu, Opportunities and challenges of wireless communication technologies for smart grid applications, IEEE PES General Meeting, IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–7.
[36]
P.P. Parikh, T.S. Sidhu, A. Shami, A comprehensive investigation of wireless lan for iec 61850–based smart distribution substation applications, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 9 (3) (2013) 1466–1476.
[37]
The Distribution Substation Goes Wireless[Online]. Available: https://www.gegridsolutions.com/Communications/Wireless.htm.
[38]
Industrial Wireless, [Online]. Available: https://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/.
[39]
H. Ren, I. Dobson, B.A. Carreras, Long-term effect of the n-1 criterion on cascading line outages in an evolving power transmission grid, IEEE Trans.Power Syst. 23 (3) (2008) 1217–1225.
[40]
J. Qi, K. Sun, S. Mei, An interaction model for simulation and mitigation of cascading failures, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 30 (2) (2015) 804–819.
[41]
M. Parandehgheibi, E. Modiano, Robustness of interdependent networks: the case of communication networks and the power grid, IEEE GLOBECOM, 2013.
[42]
Z. Huang, C. Wang, M. Stojmenovic, A. Nayak, Characterization of cascading failures in interdependent cyber-physical systems, IEEE Trans. Comput. 64 (8) (2015) 2158–2168,.
[43]
M. Rahnamay-Naeini, M.M. Hayat, Cascading failures in interdependent infrastructures: an interdependent markov-chain approach, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 7 (4) (2016) 1997–2006.

Index Terms

  1. Cyber and physical interactions to combat failure propagation in smart grid: Characterization, analysis and evaluation
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
          Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking  Volume 158, Issue C
          Jul 2019
          206 pages

          Publisher

          Elsevier North-Holland, Inc.

          United States

          Publication History

          Published: 20 July 2019

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • 0
            Total Citations
          • 0
            Total Downloads
          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          View Options

          View options

          Get Access

          Login options

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media