research-article

An analysis of ontologies and their success factors for application to business

Data & Knowledge Engineering, Volume 101, Issue C

Pages 1 - 23

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2015.11.003

Published: 01 January 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Ontologies have been less successful than they could be in large-scale business applications due to a wide variety of interpretations. This leads to confusion, and consequently, people from various research communities use the term with different - sometimes incompatible - meanings. This research work analyzes and clarifies the term ontology and points out its difference from taxonomy. By way of two business case studies, both their potential in ontological engineering and the perceived requirements for ontologies are highlighted, and their misuse in research and business is discussed. In order to examine the case for applying ontologies in a specific domain or use case, the main benefits of using ontologies are defined and categorized as technical-centered or user-centered. Key factors that influence the use of ontologies in business applications are derived and discussed. Finally, the paper offers a recommendation for efficiently applying ontologies, including adequate representation languages and an ontological engineering process supported by reference ontologies. To answer the questions of when ontologies should be used, how they can be used efficiently, and when they should not be used, we propose guidelines for selecting an appropriate model, methodology, and tool set to meet customer requirements while making most efficient use of resources.

References

[1]

R. Studer, R. Benjamins, D. Fensel, Knowledge engineering: principles and methods, Data Knowl. Eng. 25 (1-2) (1998) 161-198.

Digital Library

[2]

S.J. Russel, P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence--A Modern Approach, in: Alan Apt (Ed.) Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1995.

[3]

J. Rumbaugh, M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, W. Lorensen, Object-Oriented Modeling and Design, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1991

[4]

N.F. Noy, D.L. McGuiness, Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, 2001.

[5]

T. Gruber, A translation approach to portable ontology specifications, Knowl. Acquis. 4 (2) (1993) 199-220.

Digital Library

[6]

M.L. Brodie, On the development of data models, in: M.L. Brodie, J. Mylopoulos, J.W. Schmidt (Eds.), On Conceptual Modeling, Springer, New York 1984, pp. 19-47.

[7]

Y. Wand, V.C. Storey, R. Weber, An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling, ACM Trans. Database Syst. 24 (4) (1999) 494-528.

Digital Library

[8]

M. Alavi, D.E. Leidner, Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Q. 25 (1) (2001) 107-136.

Digital Library

[9]

R. Davis, H. Shrobe, P. Szolovits, What is a knowledge representation? AI Mag. 14 (1) (1993) 17-33.

[10]

V.C. Storey, Understanding Semantic Relationships, The VLDB Journal, 2 (4), Springer, 1993 455-488.

Digital Library

[11]

T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, O. Lassila, The Semantic Web, Scientific American Magazine March 26 2008.

[12]

H. Stuckenschmidt, Ontologien: Konzepte, Technologien und Anwendungen (German), Springer, 2011 1-274.

[13]

R. Neches, R. Fikes, T. Finin, T. Gruber, R. Patil, T. Senator, W.R. Swartout, Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing, AI Mag. 12 (3) (1991) 36-56.

Digital Library

[14]

N. Guarino, P. Giaretta, Ontologies and Knowledge Bases: Towards a Terminological Clarification, Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing, in: N. Mars (Ed.) IOS Press, Amsterdam 1995, pp. 25-32.

[15]

W. Borst, Construction of Engineering Ontologies (PhD Thesis) Institute for Telematica and Information Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 1997.

[16]

M. Hepp, Ontologies: State of the Art, Business Potential, and Grand Challenges, Ontology Management: Semantic Web, Semantic Web Services, and Business Applications, in: M. Hepp, P. De Leenheer, A. de Moor, Y. Sure (Eds.), Springer 2007, pp. 3-22.

[17]

C. Mangold, A survey and classification of semantic search approaches, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontol. 2 (1) (2007) 23-34.

Digital Library

[18]

D.L. Dong, E. Gabrilovich, G. Heitz, W. Horn, N. Lao, K. Murphy, T. Strohmann, S. Sun, W. Zhang, Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusio, Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'14), New York 2014, pp. 601-610.

[19]

F. Bauer, M. Kaltenböck, Linked Open Data: The Essentials--A Quick Start Guide for Decision Makers, http://www.reeep.org/LOD-the-Essentials.pdf (December 07, 2015).

[20]

O. Bodenreider, Ontologies and data integration in biomedicine: success stories and challenging issues, Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Data Integration in the Life Sciences (DILS'08), Springer 2008, pp. 1-4.

Digital Library

[21]

M. Hepp, Possible ontologies: how reality constrains the development of relevant ontologies, Internet Comput. 11 (1) (2007) 90-96.

Digital Library

[22]

N. Guarino, D. Oberle, S. Staab, What Is an Ontology? in: Springer, S. Staab, R. Studer (Eds.), Handbook on Ontologies, International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer 2009, pp. 1-17.

[23]

Object Management Group OMG, UML 2.5 Specification, http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5/Beta2/PDF/ (December 07, 2015).

[24]

P. Chen, The entity-relationship model--toward a unified view of data, ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1 (1) (1976) 9-36.

Digital Library

[25]

M. Hori, Semantic annotation for web content adaptation, Spinning the Semantic Web 2003 403-426.

[26]

HTML5 Semantic Elements, http://www.w3schools.com/html/html5_semantic_elements.asp (December 07, 2015).

[27]

R. Van Rees, Clarity in the usage of the terms ontology, taxonomy and classification, CIB Rep. 284 (432) (2003) 1-8.

[28]

K. Prantner, Y. Ding, M. Luger, Z. Yan, C. Herzog, Tourism ontology and semantic management system: state-of-the-art analysis, Proceeding of the IADIS International Conference 2007, pp. 111-115.

[29]

G. Dragan, D. Dragan, D. Vladan, Model Driven Engineering and Ontology Development, 2nd edition Springer, Berlin, 2009.

[30]

P. Lambe, Organising Knowledge: Taxonomies, Knowledge and Organisational Effectiveness, Chandos, 2007.

[31]

T. Leitner, W. Wöß, Optimizing early detection of production faults by applying time series analysis on integrated information, Int. J. Adv. Syst. Meas. 8 (1&2) (2015).

[32]

C.J. Janse, H. Kroeze, A. van Wigcheren, et al., A genotype and phenotype database of genetically modified malaria-parasites, Trends in Parasitol. 27 (1) (2010) 31-39.

[33]

M. Uschold, M. Gruninger, Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[34]

M. Vujasinovic, N. Ivezic, E. Barkmeyer, Z. Marjanovic, Semantic B2B-integration using an ontological message metamodel, Concurr. Eng. 18 (3) (2010) 219-232.

[35]

H. Werthner, F. Ricci, E-commerce and tourism, Mag. Commun. ACM 47 (12) (2004) 101-105.

Digital Library

[36]

C. Feilmayr, C. Grün, R. Barta, B. Pröll, H. Werthner, Covering the semantic space of tourism: an approach based on modularized ontologies, Proceeding of the 1st Workshop on Context, Information and Ontologies (CIAO'09), ACM, New York, 2009.

[37]

Deutscher Tourismusverband: Classification of Tourism Offers, http://www.deutschertourismusverband.de/klassifizierung.html (December 07, 2015).

[38]

Deutsche Hotelklassifizierung, http://www.hotelsterne.de/userfiles/Files/downloads/de/Deutsche_Hotelklassifizierung_2010-2014.pdf (December 07, 2015).

[39]

ISO 18513:2003, Tourism Services - Hotels and Other Types of Tourism Accommodation - Terminology, http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm¿snumber=31812 (December 07, 2015).

[40]

World Tourism Organization, Thesaurus on Tourism & Leisure Activities, World Tourism Organization, Madrid, Spain, 2001.

[41]

Open Travel, http://www.opentravel.org/Specifications/OnlineXmlSchema.aspx (December 07, 2015).

[42]

M. Hepp, Good Relations: an ontology for describing products and services offers on the web, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW'08), Springer LNCS, 5268 2008, pp. 332-347.

Digital Library

[43]

Accommodation Ontology Language Reference and Accommodation Ontology Meta Data, http://ontologies.sti-innsbruck.at/acco/ns.html (December 07, 2015).

[44]

S. Ou, V. Pekar, C. Orasan, C. Spurk, M. Negri, Development and alignment of a domain-specific ontology for question answering, in: European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08), 2008 (Marrakech, Morocco).

[45]

Mondeca, Semantic Web Methodologies and Tools for Intra-European Sustainable Tourism, White Paper September 2004.

[46]

DERI, OnTour Ontology, http://e-tourism.deri.at/ont/index.html (December 07, 2015).

[47]

TAGA Ontology, http://taga.sourceforge.net/owl/index.html (December 07, 2015).

[48]

S. Staab, C. Braun, I. Bruder, A. Düsterhöft, A. Heuer, M. Klettke, G. Neumann, B. Prager, J. Pretzel, H.-P. Schnurr, R. Studer, H. Uszkoreit, B. Wrenger, GETESS--searching the web exploiting German texts, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Cooperating Information Agents (CIA'99), Springer, Berlin, 1999.

[49]

EON Traveling Ontology, http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/DOE/ontologies/EON-TravellingOntology-v0.2.oil (December 07, 2015).

[50]

J. Cardoso, Developing an OWL ontology for e-tourism, semantic web services, in: J. Cardoso, A. Sheth (Eds.), Processes and Applications, Springer, New York, 2006.

Digital Library

[51]

ebSemantics Ontology, http://www.semantic-web.at/news/ebsemantics-semantic-web-enabled-ecommerce (December 07, 2015).

[52]

N. Sharda, R. Jakkilinki, M. Georgievski, M. Ponnadal, Intelligent visual travel recommender systems model for e-tourism websitesTechnical report in: Gold Coast (Ed.) Sustainable Tourism CRC, Qld, 2008.

[53]

CEN Workshop Agreement, CEN Workshop on Harmonization of Data Interchange in Tourism--WS/eTOUR, Draft for Public Review, 2009.

[54]

O. Fodor, H. Werthner, Harmonise--A Step Towards an Interoperable E-Tourism Marketplace, Int. J. Electron. Commer 9 (2) (2005).

Digital Library

[55]

H. Stuckenschmidt, F. van Harmelen, Information Sharing on the Semantic Web, Springer, Berlin, 2005.

[56]

M. Gruninger, J. Lee, Introduction: ontology applications and design, Commun. ACM 45 (2) (2002).

[57]

T. Bürger, E. Simperl, Measuring the benefits of ontologies, Proceedings of the On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems Workshops, OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters, ADI, AWeSoMe, COMBEK, EI2N, IWSSA, MONET, OnToContent + QSI, ORM, PerSys, RDDS, SEMELS, and SWWS 2008 (OTM '08), Springer LNCS, 5333 2008, pp. 584-594.

[58]

D. Oberle, How ontologies benefit enterprise applications, Semantic Web 5 (6) (2014) 473-491.

[59]

Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs), http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3987 (December 07, 2015).

[60]

T. Menzies, Cost benefits of ontologies, Intelligence 10 (3) (1999) 26-32.

Digital Library

[61]

OWL Web Ontology Language, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ (December 07, 2015).

[62]

J. Cardoso, The semantic web vision: where are we? IEEE Intell. Syst. (2007) 22-26.

[63]

T. Pellegrini, Semantic Web Awareness 2009--A Comparative Study on Approaches to Social Software and the Semantic Web, Research Report, http://www.corporate-semantic-web.de/tl_files/pub/CSW_Infotag_20090320/SemWebBarometer_2009_Report.pdf 2009 (December 07, 2015).

[64]

P. Warren, P. Mulholland, T. Collins, E. Motta, Using ontologies: understanding the user experience, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2014), Springer, Linköping, Sweden 2014, pp. 579-590.

[65]

P. Warren, Ontology users' survey--summary of results, Technical Report, Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, 2013.

[66]

E. Simperl, C. Tempich, Ontology engineering: a reality check, Proceeding of the On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE, OTM Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE 2006 (OMT '06), Part I, Springer LNCS, 4275 2006, pp. 836-854.

[67]

E. Simperl, Reusing ontologies on the semantic web: a feasibility study, Data Knowl. Eng. 68 (10) (2009) 905-925.

Digital Library

[68]

J. Cardoso, M. Hepp, M. Lytras, The Semantic Web--Real-World Applications from Industry, Springer, 2008.

[69]

R. Elmasri, S.B. Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, 7th edition Pearson/Addison-Wesley, 2015.

[70]

A. Gómez-Pérez, M. Fernandez-Lopez, O. Corcho, Ontological engineering with examples from the areas of knowledge management, e-commerce and the semantic web, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing 2004.

[71]

O. Lassila, D. McGuinness, The role of frame-based representation on the semantic web knowledge systems laboratory, Report KSL-01-02, Stanford University, 2001; also appeared as Linköping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science 6 (5), Linköping University, 2001.

[72]

C. Roussey, F. Pinet, M. Ah Kang, O. Corcho, An introduction to ontologies and ontology engineering, ontologies in urban development projects, in: G. Falquet, C. Métral, J. Teller, C. Tweed (Eds.), Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing, Springer, London, 2011.

[73]

J. Fong, Mapping extended entity relationship model to object modeling techniques, ACM Sigmod Rec. 24 (3) (1995).

[74]

R. Juric, The UML rules, ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 23 (1) (1998).

[75]

M. Fernández-López, A. Gómez-Pérez, N. Juristo, METHONDOLOGY: from ontological art towards ontological engineering, Proceedings of Symposium on Ontological Engineering of AAAI, 1997.

[76]

M. Uschold, M. King, Towards a methodology for building ontologies, in: D. Skuce (Ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing (IJCAI'95) 1995, pp. 6.1-6.10 (Montreal, Canada).

[77]

M. Jarrar, J. Demeyer, R. Meersman, On using conceptual data modeling for ontology engineering, Journal on Data Semantics (special issue on best papers from the ER, ODBASE, and COOPIS 2002 Conferences) and Springer LNCS, 2800 2003, pp. 185-207.

[78]

Das V-Modell, (German) http://v-modell.iabg.de (December 07, 2015).

[79]

Clarus Concept of Operations. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2005 Publication No. FHWA-JPO-05-072.

[80]

P. Rook, Controlling software projects, IEEE Softw. Eng. J. 1 (1) (1986) 7-16.

Digital Library

[81]

C. Alexander, Notes on the synthesis of form, Harv. Univ. Press 5 (1964).

[82]

A. Gangemi, V. Presutti, Ontology design patterns, in: S. Staab, R. Studer (Eds.), Handbook on Ontologies, International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer 2009, pp. 221-243.

[83]

A.L.N. Escórcio, J. Cardoso, Editing tools for ontology creation, chapter IV in semantic web services: theory, tools and applications, IGI Glob. (2007) 71-95.

[84]

J.C. Arpírez, A. Gómez-Pérez, A. Lozano, S.H. Pinto, Reference ontology and (ONTO)² agent: the ontology yellow pages, Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2 (4) (2000) 387-412.

[85]

NIST, ECMA, reference model for frameworks of software engineering environment, 3rd edition, NIST Special Publication, 500, 1993 1-211.

Cited By

Ehrlinger LHolzner HHemelmayr NWöß WHong JPark J(2024)A News Article Tag Categorization OntologyProceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3605098.3636153(1665-1667)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3605098.3636153
Meftah MKazar O(2023)A new ontological approach for multilingual scientific researchProceedings of the 7th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems10.1145/3644713.3644729(114-124)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3644713.3644729
Costa SManso CMarques LGadelha BConte TBarcellos M(2023)Using Networked Ontologies to support UX Evaluation in Immersive ContextProceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3638067.3638080(1-12)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3638067.3638080
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Ontologies supporting business process re-engineering
Enterprise information systems IV

The paper motivates the ontologies for the automation of a Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) methodology (in particular, for the continuous and incremental improvement of the business processes using TQM - Total Quality Management). It describes and ...
Semantic enrichment for medical ontologies

The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) contains two separate but interconnected knowledge structures, the Semantic Network (upper level) and the Metathesaurus (lower level). In this paper, we have attempted to work out better how the use of such a ...
Building application ontologies from descriptions of Semantic Web Services

The existence of an increasing number of different ontologies used in semantic web service fields raises numerous interoperation and communication problems with respect to service discovery, composition, and execution. Current approaches for ontology ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Data & Knowledge Engineering

Data & Knowledge Engineering Volume 101, Issue C

January 2016

62 pages

ISSN:0169-023X

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © Elsevier B.V.

Publisher

Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

Netherlands

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2016

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

21
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ehrlinger LHolzner HHemelmayr NWöß WHong JPark J(2024)A News Article Tag Categorization OntologyProceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3605098.3636153(1665-1667)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3605098.3636153
Meftah MKazar O(2023)A new ontological approach for multilingual scientific researchProceedings of the 7th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems10.1145/3644713.3644729(114-124)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3644713.3644729
Costa SManso CMarques LGadelha BConte TBarcellos M(2023)Using Networked Ontologies to support UX Evaluation in Immersive ContextProceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3638067.3638080(1-12)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3638067.3638080
Klück FLi YTao JWotawa F(2023)An empirical comparison of combinatorial testing and search-based testing in the context of automated and autonomous driving systemsInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107225160:COnline publication date: 1-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107225
Spoladore DPessot ETrombetta A(2023)A novel agile ontology engineering methodology for supporting organizations in collaborative ontology developmentComputers in Industry10.1016/j.compind.2023.103979151:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.compind.2023.103979
Interian RMendoza IBernardini FViterbo J(2022)Unified vocabulary in Official Gazettes: An exploratory study on procurement dataProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance10.1145/3560107.3560301(195-202)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3560107.3560301
de Freitas AScalser MCosta SBarcellos MSantos CBento Villela MRios da Hora Rodrigues Kde Gois Ribeiro Darin T(2022)Towards an ontology-based approach to develop software systems with adaptive user interfaceProceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3554364.3559139(1-7)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3554364.3559139
Costa SBarcellos MFalbo RConte Tde Oliveira K(2022)A core ontology on the Human–Computer Interaction phenomenonData & Knowledge Engineering10.1016/j.datak.2021.101977138:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.datak.2021.101977
Illescas JBuchgeher GEhrlinger LGabauer DMartinez-Gil J(2022)Representing Technical Standards as Knowledge Graph to Guide the Design of Industrial SystemsComputer Aided Systems Theory – EUROCAST 202210.1007/978-3-031-25312-6_71(603-610)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-25312-6_71
Trujillo JDavis KDu XDamiani EStorey V(2021)Conceptual modeling in the era of Big Data and Artificial IntelligenceData & Knowledge Engineering10.1016/j.datak.2021.101911135:COnline publication date: 1-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.datak.2021.101911
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents