Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Who tends to answer open-ended questions in an e-service survey? The contribution of closed-ended answers

Published: 01 December 2017 Publication History

Abstract

This study presents a web survey investigating the effects of gender, age, prior usage behaviours, and closed-ended answers on response behaviour for open-ended questions in a user satisfaction or experience evaluation. Two types of open-ended questions were measured: general comment-specific questions designed to collect comments and explanation-specific questions designed to determine the reason for a higher or lower score for the closed-ended questions. Using an online structured questionnaire on an e-service telecom website, 13,346 valid responses 73.1% male; all aged 19 or above were analysed. More than 75% of the respondents did not answer any of the open-ended questions. Although respondents tended to answer comment-specific questions 19.9% more often than explanation-specific questions 11.9%, personal characteristics emerged as significant predictors of participants’ response behaviour in both types of open-ended questions. Males, younger participants, and those who had more e-service usage behaviours answered more often than other participants. Regarding the relationship between answers in closed-ended and open-ended questions, respondents’ scaled scores were significant predictors of responses to open-ended questions, particularly comment-specific questions. This study suggests that a score of four on a five-point scale may indicate an interesting answer, with negative responses 5.5% more likely than positive responses 3.9%.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Basic Study to Prevent Non-earnest Responses in Web Surveys by Arranging the Order of Open-Ended QuestionsHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-35596-7_20(314-326)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
  • (2020)The Impact of Expectation and Disconfirmation on User Experience and Behavior IntentionDesign, User Experience, and Usability. Interaction Design10.1007/978-3-030-49713-2_32(464-475)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2020
  • (2019)Measuring e-service quality and its importance to customer satisfaction and loyalty: an empirical study in a telecom settingElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-018-9301-319:3(477-499)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Behaviour & Information Technology
Behaviour & Information Technology  Volume 36, Issue 12
December 2017
110 pages

Publisher

Taylor & Francis, Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2017

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Basic Study to Prevent Non-earnest Responses in Web Surveys by Arranging the Order of Open-Ended QuestionsHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-35596-7_20(314-326)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
  • (2020)The Impact of Expectation and Disconfirmation on User Experience and Behavior IntentionDesign, User Experience, and Usability. Interaction Design10.1007/978-3-030-49713-2_32(464-475)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2020
  • (2019)Measuring e-service quality and its importance to customer satisfaction and loyalty: an empirical study in a telecom settingElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-018-9301-319:3(477-499)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media