research-article

The uses of social television

Authors:

Crysta Metcalf,

David Wheatley,

Guy RomanoAuthors Info & Claims

Computers in Entertainment (CIE), Volume 6, Issue 1

Article No.: 8, Pages 1 - 15

https://doi.org/10.1145/1350843.1350851

Published: 01 May 2008 Publication History

Abstract

We present the results of two studies on social television concepts. In one study, a social TV prototype was tested in the field, allowing groups of users watching television at home to talk to each other over an audio link. Specific patterns of use are described, showing that users did perceive the system as valuable. In another study, focus groups were presented with several social TV concepts, and their responses were collected. These participants saw only moderate to marginal value in the concept. We discuss the discrepancy with reference to the limitations of each method. Based on our analysis, we conclude that our social television experience provides user value under certain favorable conditions. Participants deal with potential conflicts between conversation and television audio without the need for additional technical support, and there is no indication that a video link would improve the experience. However, designing for the social dynamics at the beginnings, ends, and outside of conversations remains an open challenge.

References

[1]

ABREU, J., ALMEIDA, P., AND BRANCO, V. 2001. 2BeOn: Interactive television supporting interpersonal communication. In Proceedings of the EuroGraphics 2001 Conference, ACM, New Yorik, 199-208.

Digital Library

[2]

BENTLEY, F., METCALF, C., AND HARBOE, G. 2006. Personal vs. commercial content: The similarities between consumer use of photos and music. In Proceedings of the CHI 2006 Conference, ACM, New York.

Digital Library

[3]

BERNARD, H.R. (ed.). 1998. Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. AltaMira, Walnut Creek, CA.

[4]

BEYER, H. AND HOLTZBLATT, K.1998. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Oriented Systems. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA.

Digital Library

[5]

BOERTJES, E. 2007, ConnecTV: Share the experience. In Proceedings of EuroITV 2007 (TICSP), 139-140.

[6]

BOYER, D., CORTES, M., VERNICK, M., WILBUR, S., KHAN, A., AND BALFOUR, G. 1999. Virtual social clubs: Meeting places for the Internet community. In Proceedings of the ICMCS 1999 Conference, 297-301.

Digital Library

[7]

BROOM, T. 2006. Philips AOLTV review. CNET Reviews (Feb. 19, 2001). http://reviews.cnet.com/Philips_AOLTV/4505-6487_7-4772942.html. Accessed Dec. 2006. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. 2007. American Time Use Survey. 2006 Results. (June 28, 2007). ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/news.release/atus.txt. Acessed Aug. 2007.

[8]

CESAR, P., BULTERMAN, D.C.A., AND JANSEN, A.J. 2006. An architecture for end-user TV content enrichment. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2006 Conference (Athens), 39-47.

[9]

CHUAH, M. 2002. Reality instant messenger. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Personalization in Future TV (Malaga Spain), 65-74.

[10]

COATES, T. 2005. Social software for set-top boxes. http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2005/03/social_software_for_settop_boxes/.

[11]

COPPENS, T., TRAPPENIERS, L., AND GODON, M. 2004. AmigoTV: Towards a social TV experience. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2004 Conference (Brighton, UK).

[12]

CULLINAN, C. AND AGAMANOLIS, S. 2003. Reflexion: A responsive virtual mirror for interpersonal communication. In the ECSCW 2003 Conference Supplement (Helsinki).

[13]

FINK, M., COVELL, M., AND BALUJA, S. 2006. Socialand interactive television: Applications based on real-time ambient-audio identification. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2006 Conference (Athens), 138-146.

[14]

FUSSELL, S.R., KRAUT, R.E., AND SIEGEL, J. 2000. Coordination of communication: Effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. In Proceedings of the CSCW 2000 Conference (Philadelphia, PA), 21-30.

Digital Library

[15]

GEERTS, D. 2006 Comparing voice chat and text chat in a communication tool for interactive television. In Proceedings of the NordiCHI 2006 Conference (Oslo), 461-464.

Digital Library

[16]

GHITTINO, A., IATRINO, A., MODEO, S., AND RICCHIUTI, F. 2007. Living@Room: A TV-based social experience for multimedia content streaming. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2007 Conference (TICSP), 207-212.

[17]

GOLDENBERG, S. 2007. DVRs and micro-social networking-Recreating the shared watching experience of TV. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2007 Conference (TICSP), 213-217.

[18]

HARRISON, C. AND AMENTO, B. 2007. CollaboraTV: Using asynchronous communication to make TV social again. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2007 Conference (TICSP), 218-222.

[19]

HEß, J. 2007. Supporting community building in iTV environments. In: Proceedings of the EuroITV 2007 Conference (TICSP),129-130.

[20]

HU, J. 2003. America Online confirms end of AOLTV. CNET News.com (Feb. 18, 2003). http://news.com.com/2100-1023-984920.html. Accessed Dec. 2006.

[21]

LULL, J. 1990. The social uses of television. In Inside Family Viewing, Routledge, New York, 28-48.

[22]

LUYTEN, K., THYS, K., HUYPENS, S., AND CONINX, K. 2006. Telebuddies: Social stitching with interactive television. In Extended Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM, New York.

Digital Library

[23]

METCALF, C. AND HARBOE, G. 2006. Sunday is family day. In Proceedings of the EPIC 2006 Conference (Portland, OR).

[24]

NIELSEN 2006. Nielsen top TV ratings. 2006. http://www.nielsenmedia.com/. Accessed Dec. 2006.

[25]

NOLL, A.M. 1992. Anatomy of a failure: Picturephone revisited. Telecommunications Policy 16, 4, (May/June 1), 307-316.

[26]

OEHLBERG, L., DUCHENEAUT, N., THORNTON, J.D., MOORE, R.J., AND NICKELL, E. 2006. Social TV: Designing for distributed, sociable television viewing. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2006 Conference (Athens), 251-259.

[27]

QUICO, C. 2003. Are communication services the killer app for interactive TV? In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2003 Conference (Brighton, UK), 99-107.

[28]

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. 2006. America's families and living arrangements:2006. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam/cps2005.html.

[29]

WEISZ, J.D., KIESLER, S., ZHANG, H., REN, Y., KRAUT, R.E., AND KONSTAN, J.A. 2007. Watching together: Integrating text chat with video. In Proceedings of the CHI 2007 Conference (San Jose, CA ), 877-886.

Digital Library

Cited By

Galily YSamuel-Azran TLaor T(2024)The surprising role of marital status on sport second-screening: demographic influences during the 2022 world cup viewing in IsraelFrontiers in Sports and Active Living10.3389/fspor.2024.13293646Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1329364
von Essen EPeterson J(2024)Digital wildlife expeditions and their impact on human-wildlife relations: Inside the phenomenon of livestreaming an annual moose migrationDigital Geography and Society10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.1000977(100097)Online publication date: Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.100097
Siean APamparău CVatavu R(2022)Scenario-based Exploration of Integrating Radar Sensing into Everyday Objects for Free-Hand Television ControlProceedings of the 2022 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3505284.3532982(357-362)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3505284.3532982
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

The uses of social television
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Ambient social tv: drawing people into a shared experience
CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

We examine how ambient displays can augment social television. Social TV 2 is an interactive television solution that incorporates two ambient displays to convey to participants an aggregate view of their friends' current TV-watching status. Social TV 2 ...
CollaboraTV: making television viewing social again
UXTV '08: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and video

With the advent of video-on-demand services and digital video recorders, the way in which we consume media is undergoing a fundamental change. People today are less likely to watch shows at the same time, let alone the same place. As a result, ...
Perceptions of value: the uses of social television
EuroITV '07: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video

We present the results of two studies on social television concepts. In one study, a Social TV prototype was tested in the field, allowing groups of users watching television at home to talk to each other over an audio link. Specific patterns of use are ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Computers in Entertainment

Computers in Entertainment Volume 6, Issue 1

Social television and user interaction

January 2008

123 pages

EISSN:1544-3574

DOI:10.1145/1350843

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2008 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2008

Accepted: 01 November 2007

Received: 01 April 2007

Published in CIE Volume 6, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Popular
Editor picked

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

60
Total Citations
View Citations
2,114
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)29
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Galily YSamuel-Azran TLaor T(2024)The surprising role of marital status on sport second-screening: demographic influences during the 2022 world cup viewing in IsraelFrontiers in Sports and Active Living10.3389/fspor.2024.13293646Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1329364
von Essen EPeterson J(2024)Digital wildlife expeditions and their impact on human-wildlife relations: Inside the phenomenon of livestreaming an annual moose migrationDigital Geography and Society10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.1000977(100097)Online publication date: Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.100097
Siean APamparău CVatavu R(2022)Scenario-based Exploration of Integrating Radar Sensing into Everyday Objects for Free-Hand Television ControlProceedings of the 2022 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3505284.3532982(357-362)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3505284.3532982
Leveneur-Martel L(2021)Les cérémonies Miss France, de la télévision à TwitterRéseaux10.3917/res.230.0171N° 230:6(171-214)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.3917/res.230.0171
Rothe SSchmidt AMontagud MBuschek DHußmann H(2021)Social viewing in cinematic virtual reality: a design space for social movie applicationsVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-020-00472-425:3(613-630)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10055-020-00472-4
Elishar-Malka VAriel YWeimann-Saks D(2020)Migrating to Social Networks While Watching Televised Sports: A Case Study of the Effect of Enjoyment on Second-Screen Usage During the World CupInternational Journal of Sport Communication10.1123/ijsc.2020-0325(1-13)Online publication date: 2020
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2020-0325
Song HKim JChoi Y(2019)Social TV Viewing : The Effect of Virtual Co-Viewers and the Role of Social PresenceJournal of Digital Contents Society10.9728/dcs.2019.20.8.154320:8(1543-1552)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2019
https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.8.1543
Suh YChung TKim J(2019)The Relationship between Motivation of Social Viewing Experiences, Satisfaction, and Loyalty in Sports BroadcastingInternational Journal of Computer Science in Sport10.2478/ijcss-2019-000918:1(148-159)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2019
https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2019-0009
Weimann-Saks DAriel YElishar-Malka V(2019)Social Second Screen: WhatsApp and Watching the World CupCommunication & Sport10.1177/2167479518821913(216747951882191)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479518821913
Zhi QLin STalkad Sukumar PMetoyer RBrewster SFitzpatrick GCox AKostakos V(2019)GameViewsProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300499(1-13)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3290605.3300499
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents