Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1806689.1806710acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A full characterization of quantum advice

Published: 05 June 2010 Publication History

Abstract

We prove the following surprising result: given any quantum state rho on n qubits, there exists a local Hamiltonian H on poly(n) qubits (e.g., a sum of two-qubit interactions), such that any ground state of H can be used to simulate rho on all quantum circuits of fixed polynomial size. In terms of complexity classes, this implies that BQP/qpoly is contained in QMA/poly, which supersedes the previous result of Aaronson that BQP/qpoly is contained in PP/poly. Indeed, we can exactly characterize quantum advice, as equivalent in power to untrusted quantum advice combined with trusted classical advice.
Proving our main result requires combining a large number of previous tools -- including a result of Alon et al. on learning of real-valued concept classes, a result of Aaronson on the learnability of quantum states, and a result of Aharonov and Regev on "QMA+ super-verifiers" -- and also creating some new ones. The main new tool is a so-called majority-certificates lemma, which is closely related to boosting in machine learning, and which seems likely to find independent applications. In its simplest version, this lemma says the following. Given any set S of Boolean functions on n variables, any function f in S can be expressed as the pointwise majority of m=O(n) functions f1,...,fm in S, such that each fi is the unique function in S compatible with O(log|S|) input/output constraints.

References

[1]
S. Aaronson. Multilinear formulas and skepticism of quantum computing. STOC, p. 118--127, 2004.
[2]
S. Aaronson. Limitations of quantum advice and one-way communication. Theory of Computing, 1:1--28, 2005. quant--ph/0402095.
[3]
S. Aaronson. Quantum computing, postselection, and probabilistic polynomial-time. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A461(2063):3473--3482, 2005.
[4]
S. Aaronson. Oracles are subtle but not malicious. Complexity (CCC), p. 340--354, 2006.
[5]
S. Aaronson. QMA/qpoly is contained in PSPACE/poly: de-Merlinizing quantum protocols. Complexity (CCC), p. 261--273, 2006.
[6]
S. Aaronson. The learnability of quantum states. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 463(2088):3089--3114, 2007.
[7]
S. Aaronson and G. Kuperberg. Quantum versus classical proofs and advice. Theory of Computing, 3(7):129--157, 2007.
[8]
D. Aharonov, D. Gottesman, S. Irani, and J. Kempe. The power of quantum systems on a line. Comm. Math. Phys., 287(1):41--65, 2009.
[9]
D. Aharonov and T. Naveh. Quantum NP -- a survey. quant-ph/0210077, 2002.
[10]
D. Aharonov and O. Regev. A lattice problem in Quantum NP. FOCS, p. 210--219, 2003.
[11]
D. Aharonov and O. Regev. Lattice problems in NP intersect coNP. J. ACM, 52(5):749--765, 2005.
[12]
N. Alon, S. Ben-David, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and D. Haussler. Scale-sensitive dimensions, uniform convergence, and learnability. J. ACM, 44(4):615--631, 1997.
[13]
A. Ambainis, A. Nayak, A. Ta-Shma, and U.V. Vazirani. Quantum dense coding and quantum finite automata. J. ACM, 49:496--511, 2002.
[14]
L. Babai. Local expansion of vertex-transitive graphs and random generation in finite groups. STOC, p. 164--174, 1991.
[15]
P.L. Bartlett and P.M. Long. Prediction, learning, uniform convergence, and scale--sensitive dimensions. J. Comput. Sys. Sci., 56(2):174--190, 1998.
[16]
N.H. Bshouty, R. Cleve, R. Gavalda, S. Kannan, and C. Tamon. Oracles and queries that are sufficient for exact learning. J. Comput. Sys. Sci., 52(3):421--433, 1996.
[17]
V. Chakaravarthy and S. Roy. Oblivious symmetric alternation. STACS, p. 230--241, 2006.
[18]
L. Fortnow and R. Santhanam. Fixed--polynomial size circuit bounds, 2006. ECCC TR06-157.
[19]
Y. Freund and R.E. Schapire. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. Sys. Sci., 55(1):119--139, 1997.
[20]
P. Hausladen and W.K. Wootters. A 'pretty good' measurement for distinguishing quantum states. J. Modern Optics, 41(12):2385--2390, 1994.
[21]
A.S. Holevo. Some estimates of the information transmitted by quantum communication channels. Problems of Information Transmission, 9:177--183, 1973. English translation.
[22]
R. Impagliazzo. Hard-core distributions for somewhat hard problems. FOCS, p. 538--545, 1995.
[23]
S. Kakade and A. Tewari. Learning theory lecture notes, 2008. ttic.uchicago.edu/symbol{126}tewari/LT_SP2008.html.
[24]
R.M. Karp and R.J. Lipton. Turing machines that take advice. Enseign. Math., 28:191--201, 1982.
[25]
J. Kempe, A. Kitaev, and O. Regev. The complexity of the Local Hamiltonian problem. SIAM J. Comput., 35(5):1070--1097, 2006.
[26]
C. Marriott and J. Watrous. Quantum Arthur-Merlin games. Computational Complexity, 14(2):122--152, 2005.
[27]
H. Nishimura and T. Yamakami. Polynomial time quantum computation with advice. Inform. Proc. Lett., 90:195--204, 2003.
[28]
R. Raz. Quantum information and the PCP theorem. FOCS, p. 459--468, 2005.
[29]
R.E. Schapire. The strength of weak learnability. Machine Learning, 5(2):197--227, 1990.
[30]
G. Vidal. Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 2003.
[31]
J. Watrous. Succinct quantum proofs for properties of finite groups. FOCS, p. 537--546, 2000.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Certified Randomness from Quantum SupremacyProceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3564246.3585145(933-944)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
  • (2018)Online learning of quantum statesProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3327546.3327572(8976-8986)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2018
  • (2016)Bounds on the power of proofs and advice in general physical theoriesProceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science10.1098/rspa.2016.0076472:2190(20160076)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A full characterization of quantum advice

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    STOC '10: Proceedings of the forty-second ACM symposium on Theory of computing
    June 2010
    812 pages
    ISBN:9781450300506
    DOI:10.1145/1806689
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 June 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. advice
    2. boosting
    3. compression
    4. karp-lipton theorem
    5. learning
    6. local hamiltonians
    7. nonuniform computation
    8. quantum computation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    STOC'10
    Sponsor:
    STOC'10: Symposium on Theory of Computing
    June 5 - 8, 2010
    Massachusetts, Cambridge, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Certified Randomness from Quantum SupremacyProceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3564246.3585145(933-944)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
    • (2018)Online learning of quantum statesProceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3327546.3327572(8976-8986)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2018
    • (2016)Bounds on the power of proofs and advice in general physical theoriesProceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science10.1098/rspa.2016.0076472:2190(20160076)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016
    • (2013)Quantum rejection samplingACM Transactions on Computation Theory10.1145/2493252.24932565:3(1-33)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2013
    • (2013)How big are quantum states?Quantum Computing since Democritus10.1017/CBO9780511979309.015(200-216)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2013
    • (2012)Quantum rejection samplingProceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference10.1145/2090236.2090261(290-308)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2012

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media