research-article

Public Access

Traversing Transmedia Together: Co-designing an Educational Alternate Reality Game For Teens, With Teens

Authors:

Elizabeth Bonsignore,

Anthony Pellicone,

Steven Shumway,

Kathryn Kaczmarek,

Carlea Holl-Jensen,

Jes KoepflerAuthors Info & Claims

IDC '16: Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children

Pages 11 - 24

https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930712

Published: 21 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

An Alternate Reality Game (ARG) is an interactive storygame hybrid whose core mechanics include collaborative problem solving and storytelling. ARGs are also participatory experiences, because game designers dynamically adjust content in response to players' actions as game play progresses. What if the participatory process was extended during the design phase of an ARG as well? Few, if any, studies have explored how to include player populations in the ARG design process -- especially ARGs that target youth. In this paper, we share the process we followed to design a large-scale ARG to promote scientific inquiry for teenagers (13-17 years old) by partnering with them. Our findings suggest that co-designing with youth resulted in novel design features in the final game, and gave us insight into adolescent attitudes toward various scientific concepts. We also share co-design techniques that were not as effective and offer suggestions for future approaches.

References

[1]

June Ahn, Mega Subramaniam, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Anthony Pellicone, Amanda Waugh, and Jason Yip. 2014. I want to be a game designer or scientist": Connected learning and developing identities with urban, African-American youth. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2014).

[2]

June Ahn, Mega Subramaniam, Kenneth R. Fleischmann, and Allison Druin. 2014. Sci-Dentity Home Page. Sci-Dentity: Developing STEM Identities through Sci-Fi Storytelling and Online Peer Networks. Retrieved from http://scidentity.umd.edu/

[3]

June Ahn, Mega Subramaniam, Kenneth R. Fleischmann, Amanda Waugh, Greg Walsh, and Allison Druin. 2012. Youth identities as remixers in an online community of storytellers: Attitudes, strategies, and values. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49, 1: 1--10. http://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901089

[4]

Katie Bessiere and Allison Druin. 2014. 2014 SandboxSummit: A Co-design Journey: Random + Ridiculous = Fun. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxgEMG57eGo

[5]

Susanne Bødker, Dan Sjögren, Pelle Ehn, and Yngve Sundblad. 2000. Co-operative Design -- perspectives on 20 years with "the Scandinavian IT Design Model." Proceedings of NordiCHI 2000, NordiCHI, 1--9.

[6]

Hennie Boeije. 2002. A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews. Quality and Quantity 36, 4: 391--409. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486

[7]

Elizabeth Bonsignore, June Ahn, Tamara Clegg, Mona Leigh Guha, Jason C. Yip, and Allison Druin. 2013. Embedding Participatory Design into Designs for Learning: An Untapped Interdisciplinary Resource? To See the World and a Grain of Sand: Learning across Levels of Space, Time, and Scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings Volume 1 --- Full Papers & Symposia., International Society of the Learning Sciences, 549--556.

[8]

Elizabeth Bonsignore, Derek Hansen, Kari Kraus, and Marc Ruppel. 2012. Alternate Reality Games as Platforms for Practicing 21st-Century Literacies. International Journal of Learning and Media 4, 1: 25--54. http://doi.org/10.1162/IJLM_a_00086

[9]

Elizabeth Bonsignore, Derek Hansen, Kari Kraus, Amanda Visconti, June Ahn, and Allison Druin. 2013. Playing for real: designing alternate reality games for teenagers in learning contexts. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 237--246.

Digital Library

[10]

Elizabeth Bonsignore, Jes Koepfler, Mona Leigh Guha, June Ahn, and Kari Kraus. 2014. Exploring Teen Co-design in Alternate Reality Games for Learning.

[11]

Elizabeth Bonsignore, Alexander J. Quinn, Allison Druin, and Benjamin B. Bederson. 2013. Sharing Stories "in the Wild": A Mobile Storytelling Case Study Using StoryKit. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 3: 1--38.

Digital Library

[12]

Tatiana Buhler, Carman Neustaedter, and Serena Hillman. 2013. How and why teenagers use video chat. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM, 759--768.

Digital Library

[13]

William C Carter and Henry-Jean Servat. 2005. The Proust questionnaire. Assouline, New York.

[14]

Tamara Clegg, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Jason Yip, et al. 2012. Technology for promoting scientific practice and personal meaning in life-relevant learning. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 152--161.

Digital Library

[15]

Angela Colvert. 2009. Peer puppeteers: Alternate reality gaming in primary school settings. Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory: DiGRA, Brunel University, London. Retrieved from www. digra. org/dl/db/09287.19018.pdf.{Accessed 14/05/12}.

[16]

John W. Creswell. 2007. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

[17]

Karin Danielsson and Charlotte Wiberg. 2006. Participatory design of learning media: Designing educational computer games with and for teenagers. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 3, 4: 275--291.

[18]

Christy Dena. 2008. Emerging Participatory Culture Practices: Player-Created Tiers in Alternate Reality Games. Convergence 14, 1: 41--57. http://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084418

[19]

Betsy DiSalvo, Mark Guzdial, Charles Meadows, Ken Perry, Tom McKlin, and Amy Bruckman. 2013. Workifying games: successfully engaging african american gamers with computer science. Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, ACM, 317--322.

Digital Library

[20]

Gabriella Dodero, Rosella Gennari, Alessandra Melonio, and Santina Torello. 2014. Gamified co-design with cooperative learning. CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 707--718.

Digital Library

[21]

Allison Druin. 1999. Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '99), 592--599. http://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303166

Digital Library

[22]

Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 21, 1: 1--25. http://doi.org/

[23]

EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. 2009. 7 Things You Should Know About Alternate Reality Games. EDUCAUSE, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/7-things-you-should-know-about-alternate-reality-games

[24]

Ken Eklund. 2007. WWO: Credits and Contact. World Without Oil (WWO). Retrieved March 10, 2011 from http://www.worldwithoutoil.org/metacontact.htm

[25]

Mirjam Palosaari Eladhari and Michael Mateas. 2008. Semi-autonomous avatars in world of minds: a case study of AI-based game design. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, ACM, 201--208.

Digital Library

[26]

R. Darin Ellis and Sri H. Kurniawan. 2000. Increasing the Usability of Online Information for Older Users: A Case Study in Participatory Design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 12, 2: 263--276. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1202_6

[27]

Jerry Alan Fails, Mona Leigh Guha, and Allison Druin. 2012. Methods and Techniques for Involving Children in the Design of New Technology for Children. Foundations and Trends® in Human--Computer Interaction 6, 2: 85--166. http://doi.org/10.1561/1100000018

Digital Library

[28]

Deborah A. Fields, Yasmin B. Kafai, and Kristin Searle. 2012. Functional Aesthetics for Learning: Creative Tensions in Youth e-Textile Designs. The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012) -- Volume 1, Full papers, International Society of the Learning Sciences, 188--195.

[29]

Karen E. Fisher, Joen C. Durrance, and Madan Bouch Hinton. 2004. Information Grounds and the Use of Need-Based Services by Immigrants in Queens, New York: A context-Based, Outcome Evaluation Approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 55, 8: 754--766. http://doi.org/Article

Digital Library

[30]

Dan Fitton, Beth Bell, Janet C. Read, Ole Iversen, Linda Little, and Matthew Horton. 2014. Understanding teen UX: building a bridge to the future. CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 79--82.

Digital Library

[31]

Frank Koughan and Douglas Rushkoff. 2014. Generation Like. FRONTLINE. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/generation-like/

[32]

Christopher Frauenberger, Judith Good, and Wendy Keay-Bright. 2011. Designing technology for children with special needs: bridging perspectives through participatory design. CoDesign 7, 1: 1--28.

[33]

Batya Friedman, Alan Borning, Janet L. Davis, et al. 2008. Laying the foundations for public participation and value advocacy: interaction design for a large scale urban simulation. Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Digital government research, Digital Government Society of North America, 305--314.

Digital Library

[34]

Tracy Fullerton. 2014. Game design workshop: a playcentric approach to creating innovative games. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.

[35]

James Gee. 2008. Learning and Games. In The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning, Katie Salen (ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 21--40.

[36]

Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2010. Investigating the impact of design processes on children. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 198--201.

Digital Library

[37]

Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2013. Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1: 14--23. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.003

[38]

David Gurzick, Kevin F. White, Wayne G. Lutters, Brian M. Landry, Caroline Dombrowski, and Jeffery Y. Kim. 2011. Designing the future of collaborative workplace systems: lessons learned from a comparison with alternate reality games. Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, ACM, 174--180.

Digital Library

[39]

Jessica Hammer, Forlizzi, Jodi, Mike Christel, et al. Playtesting. Playtesting (workshops, resources). Retrieved from http://playtestingworkshops.com/

[40]

Judith A. Holton. 2007. The coding process and its challenges. In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, Bryant, Antony and Charmaz, Kathy (eds.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 265--289.

[41]

Minna Isomursu, Pekka Isomursu, and Kaisa Still. 2003. Involving young girls in product concept design. Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Universal usability, ACM, 98--105.

Digital Library

[42]

Minna Isomursu, Pekka Isomursu, and Kaisa Still. 2004. Capturing tacit knowledge from young girls. Interacting with Computers 16, 3: 431--449. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2004.04.004

[43]

M. Itō. 2010. Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. MIT Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=CRe01HDPY7gC

[44]

Nassim JafariNaimi and Eric M. Meyers. 2015. Collective Intelligence or Group Think?: Engaging Participation Patterns in World without Oil. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1872--1881.

Digital Library

[45]

Henry Jenkins, Katie Clinton, Ravi Purushotma, Alice J Robinson, and Margaret Weigel. 2006. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. MacArthur Foundation, Chicago, IL.

[46]

Margeaux Johnson, Amy G. Buhler, and Chris Hillman. 2010. The Library is Undead: Information Seeking During the Zombie Apocalypse. Journal of Library Innovation 1, 2: 29--43.

[47]

Yasmin B. Kafai, Deborah A. Fields, and Kristin Searle. 2012. Making Technology Visible: Connecting the Learning of Crafts, Circuitry and Coding in Youth e-Textile Designs. The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012) -- Volume 1, Full papers, International Society of the Learning Sciences, 188--195.

[48]

Anu Kankainen, Kirsikka Vaajakallio, Vesa Kantola, and Tuuli Mattelmäki. 2012. Storytelling Group -- a co-design method for service design. Behaviour & Information Technology 31, 3: 221--230. http://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.563794

[49]

Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2010. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Wiley, Chichester West Sussex U.K.

Digital Library

[50]

A. Lenhart. 2012. Teens & Online Video. Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Teens-and-online-video.aspx

[51]

Amanda Lenhart. 2015. Teen, Social Media and Technology Overview 2015. Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/04/PI_TeensandTech_Update2015_0409151.pdf

[52]

Megan R. Luce and Sherry Hsi. 2015. Science-Relevant Curiosity Expression and Interest in Science: An Exploratory Study. Science Education 99, 1: 70--97. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21144

[53]

Adam Martin, Brooke Thompson, and Tom Chatfield. 2006. Alternate Reality Games White Paper -- IGDA ARG SIG. Retrieved January 23, 2015 from http://www.christydena.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/igda-alternaterealitygames-whitepaper-2006.pdf

[54]

Emanuela Mazzone, Janet C. Read, and Russell Beale. 2008. Design with and for disaffected teenagers. Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges, ACM, 290--297.

Digital Library

[55]

Jane McGonigal. 2011. Reality is broken: why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin Press, New York.

Digital Library

[56]

M Muller. 2008. Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI. In The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications (2nd ed), Andrew Sears and Julie Jacko (eds.). Taylor & Francis, New York, 1061--1082.

Digital Library

[57]

National Academy of Sciences. 2011. Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. Retrieved January 25, 2016 from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12984

[58]

National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2015. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2015. Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15311/

[59]

Greg Niemeyer, Antero Garcia, and Reza Naima. 2009. Black cloud: patterns towards da future. Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Multimedia, ACM, 1073--1082.

Digital Library

[60]

Leyla Norooz, Matthew Louis Mauriello, Anita Jorgensen, Brenna McNally, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2015. BodyVis: A New Approach to Body Learning Through Wearable Sensing and Visualization. ACM Press, 1025--1034. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702299

Digital Library

[61]

Laura Parker. 2011. The Science of Playtesting. Gamespot. Retrieved from http://www.gamespot.com/articles/the-science-of-playtesting/1100-6323661/

[62]

M Q Patton. 1999. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research 34, 5 Pt 2: 1189--1208.

[63]

James W. Pellegrino, Mark R. Wilson, Judith A. Koenig, and Alexandra S. Beatty. 2014. Developing assessments for the next generation science standards. National Academies Press.

[64]

Anthony Pellicone, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Katie Kaczmarek, Kari Kraus, June Ahn, and Derek Hansen. in press. Alternate reality games for learning: A frame by frame analysis. In In Alternate Reality Games and the Cusp of Digital Gameplay, Greg Niemeyer and Antero Garcia (eds.). Bloomsbury, New York.

[65]

Erika S. Poole and Tamara Peyton. 2013. Interaction design research with adolescents: methodological challenges and best practices. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 211--217.

Digital Library

[66]

Janet C. C. Read, Matthew Horton, Ole Iversen, Daniel Fitton, and Linda Little. 2013. Methods of working with teenagers in interaction design. CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3243--3246.

Digital Library

[67]

Janet C. Read, Matthew Horton, Daniel Fitton, Linda Little, Russell Beale, and Nicola Toth. 2013. On being cool: exploring interaction design for teenagers. Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference, British Computer Society, 1--10.

Digital Library

[68]

Joseph S. Renzulli, Marcia Gentry, and Sally M. Reis. 2004. A Time and a Place for Authentic Learning. Educational Leadership 62, 1: 73--75.

[69]

Katie Salen. 2007. Gaming Literacies: A Game Design Study in Action. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia 16, 3: 301--322.

[70]

Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman. 2003. Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Digital Library

[71]

Michael Scaife, Yvonne Rogers, Frances Aldrich, and Matt Davies. 1997. Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 343--350.

Digital Library

[72]

Douglas Schuler and Aki Namioka. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.

Digital Library

[73]

David Shaffer. 2004. Pedagogical praxis: The professions as models for postindustrial education. The Teachers College Record 106, 7: 1401--1421.

[74]

Kurt Squire. 2006. From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience. Educational Researcher 35, 8: 19--29.

[75]

Kurt Squire. 2008. Open-Ended Video Games: A Model for Developing Learning for the Interactive Age. In The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning, Katie Salen (ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 167--199.

[76]

Constance Steinkuehler and Sean Duncan. 2008. Scientific Habits of Mind in Virtual Worlds. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17, 6: 530--543. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9120-8

[77]

Helena Sustar, Simon Bowen, Andy Dearden, and Wostenholme. 2013. Using popular culture to enable health service co-design with young people. Crafting the Future.

[78]

Elizabeth Svoboda. 2015. The rise of the "gaming for good" movement. Newsweek Tech & Science. Retrieved from http://www.newsweek.com/rise-gaming-good-movement-340198

[79]

Greg Walsh, Alison Druin, Mona Leigh Guha, et al. 2010. Layered elaboration: a new technique for co-design with children. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 1237--1240.

Digital Library

[80]

Greg Walsh, Elizabeth Foss, Jason Yip, and Allison Druin. 2013. FACIT PD: a framework for analysis and creation of intergenerational techniques for participatory design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2893--2902.

Digital Library

[81]

Brian Winn and Carrie Heeter. 2007. Resolving Conflicts in Educational Game Design Through Playtesting. Innovate: Journal of Online Education 3, 2: Article 6.

[82]

Neil Winterburn, Peggy Gregory, and Dan Fitton. 2014. Designing Teenage Emotions with a Life of Their Own. 161--170. http://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2014.17

Digital Library

[83]

Robert K. Yin. 2009. Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Los Angeles Calif.

[84]

Jason C. Yip, Elizabeth Foss, Elizabeth Bonsignore, et al. 2013. Children initiating and leading cooperative inquiry sessions. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 293--296.

Digital Library

[85]

Jason Yip, Tamara Clegg, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Helene Gelderblom, Emily Rhodes, and Allison Druin. 2013. Brownies or bags-of-stuff?: domain expertise in cooperative inquiry with children. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 201--210.

Digital Library

[86]

Yip, Jason C., Foss, Elizabeth, and Mona Leigh Guha. 2012. Co-designing with Adoloescents. Copenhagen, Denmark.

Cited By

Torgersson OBaykal GEriksson E(2024)Learning from Learning - Design-Based Research Practices in Child-Computer InteractionProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655754(338-354)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655754
Saiger MDeterding SGega L(2023)Children and Young People’s Involvement in Designing Applied Games: Scoping ReviewJMIR Serious Games10.2196/4268011(e42680)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.2196/42680
Uchidiuno JSolyst JKemper JHarpstead EHigashi RHammer J(2023)“What's Your Name Again?”: How Race and Gender Dynamics Impact Codesign Processes and OutputACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/360362430:6(1-26)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603624
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Traversing Transmedia Together: Co-designing an Educational Alternate Reality Game For Teens, With Teens
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education

Recommendations

Playing for real: designing alternate reality games for teenagers in learning contexts
IDC '13: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children

An Alternate Reality Game (ARG) is a form of transmedia storytelling that engages players in scavenger hunt-like missions to collectively uncover, interpret, and reassemble the fragments of a story that is distributed across multiple media, platforms, ...
Learning through Participatory Design: Designing Digital Badges for and with Teens
IDC '16: Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children

Children and teens have valuable insights to offer in the design of sociotechnical learning tools and environments. Prior work has identified a range of participatory design (PD) techniques that have been used successfully to engage youth of various ...
Teen as research-apprentice: A restorative justice approach for centering adolescents as the authority of their own online safety
Abstract
We engaged with 21 teens to plan an intergenerational participatory design program called Teenovate for creating teen-centered online safety interventions. Socio-technical solutions for adolescent online safety mostly take on parent-...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

IDC '16: Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children

June 2016

774 pages

ISBN:9781450343138

DOI:10.1145/2930674

Conference Chairs:
Janet C. Read
University of Central Lancashire, UK
,
Phil Stenton
BBC Research & Development, UK

Copyright © 2016 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 June 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

National Science Foundation

Conference

IDC '16

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

IDC '16: Interaction Design and Children

June 21 - 24, 2016

Manchester, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

IDC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 77 submissions, 47%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

19
Total Citations
View Citations
1,347
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)227
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24

Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Torgersson OBaykal GEriksson E(2024)Learning from Learning - Design-Based Research Practices in Child-Computer InteractionProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655754(338-354)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655754
Saiger MDeterding SGega L(2023)Children and Young People’s Involvement in Designing Applied Games: Scoping ReviewJMIR Serious Games10.2196/4268011(e42680)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.2196/42680
Uchidiuno JSolyst JKemper JHarpstead EHigashi RHammer J(2023)“What's Your Name Again?”: How Race and Gender Dynamics Impact Codesign Processes and OutputACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/360362430:6(1-26)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603624
Uchidiuno JSolyst JHarpstead EHigashi R(2023)“I'm a little less inclined to do it”: How Afterschool Programs’ Culture Impact Co-Design Processes and OutcomesProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596006(1263-1276)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3563657.3596006
Maestre JGroves DFurness MShih P(2023)"It’s like With the Pregnancy Tests": Co-design of Speculative Technology for Public HIV-related Stigma and its Implications for Social MediaProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581033(1-21)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581033
Chatlani NDavis ABadillo-Urquiola KBonsignore EWisniewski P(2023)Teen as research-apprenticeInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.10054935:COnline publication date: 1-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100549
Zhang XWang B(2023)Enhancing Children’s Cultural Empowerment Through Participatory Game Design Based on Hometown Ceramic CultureHCI in Games10.1007/978-3-031-35979-8_8(105-114)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35979-8_8
Kao DRatan RMousas CJoshi AMelcer E(2022)Audio Matters Too: How Audial Avatar Customization Enhances Visual Avatar CustomizationProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501848(1-27)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3501848
Zahlsen ØSvanæs DDahl Y(2022)Representative Participation in a Large-Scale Health IT ProjectComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-022-09457-032:3(507-544)Online publication date: 28-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09457-0
Hirskyj-Douglas IGray SPiitulainen RRoussou MShahid SFails JLandoni M(2021)ZooDesign: Methods for Understanding and Facilitating Children’s Education at ZoosProceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3459990.3460697(204-215)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3459990.3460697
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents