Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3308558.3313704acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning Task-Specific City Region Partition

Published: 13 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The proliferation of publicly accessible urban data provide new insights on various urban tasks. A frequently used approach is to treat each region as a data sample and build a model over all the regions to observe the correlations between urban features (e.g., demographics) and the target variable (e.g., crime count). To define regions, most existing studies use fixed grids or pre-defined administrative boundaries (e.g., census tracts or community areas). In reality, however, definitions of regions should be different depending on tasks (e.g., regional crime count prediction vs. real estate prices estimation). In this paper, we propose a new problem of task-specific city region partitioning, aiming to find the best partition in a city w.r.t. a given task. We prove this is an NP-hard search problem with no trivial solution. To learn the partition, we first study two variants of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). We further propose a reinforcement learning scheme for effective sampling the search space. We conduct experiments on two real datasets in Chicago (i.e., crime count and real estate price) to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.

References

[1]
2010. United States Census Bureau. Demographics Survey. http://www.census.gov
[2]
Konstantin Andreev and Harald Racke. 2006. Balanced graph partitioning. Theory of Computing Systems 39, 6 (2006), 929-939.
[3]
Christophe Andrieu, Nando De Freitas, Arnaud Doucet, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. An introduction to MCMC for machine learning. Machine learning 50, 1-2 (2003), 5-43.
[4]
Richard Bellman and Robert Roth. 1969. Curve fitting by segmented straight lines. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 64, 327 (1969), 1079-1084.
[5]
Santo Fortunato. 2010. Community detection in graphs. Physics reports 486, 3-5 (2010), 75-174.
[6]
Santo Fortunato and Marc Barthelemy. 2007. Resolution limit in community detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 1 (2007), 36-41.
[7]
Yanjie Fu, Yong Ge, Yu Zheng, Zijun Yao, Yanchi Liu, Hui Xiong, and Jing Yuan. 2014. Sparse real estate ranking with online user reviews and offline moving behaviors. In Data Mining (ICDM), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 120-129.
[8]
Corina Graif, Andrew S Gladfelter, and Stephen A Matthews. 2014. Urban poverty and neighborhood effects on crime: Incorporating spatial and network perspectives. Sociology compass 8, 9 (2014), 1140-1155.
[9]
Ke Li and Jitendra Malik. 2016. Learning to optimize. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01885(2016).
[10]
Yexin Li, Yu Zheng, Huichu Zhang, and Lei Chen. 2015. Traffic prediction in a bike-sharing system. In Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 33.
[11]
Kevin P. Murphy. 2012. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
[12]
Giulio Rossetti, Luca Pappalardo, Riivo Kikas, Dino Pedreschi, Fosca Giannotti, and Marlon Dumas. 2016. Homophilic network decomposition: a community-centric analysis of online social services. Social Network Analysis and Mining 6, 1 (2016), 103.
[13]
Malcolm Strens. 2003. Evolutionary MCMC sampling and optimization in discrete spaces. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-03). 736-743.
[14]
Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto. 1998. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Vol. 1. MIT press Cambridge.
[15]
Hado Van Hasselt, Arthur Guez, and David Silver. 2016. Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-Learning. In AAAI, Vol. 16. 2094-2100.
[16]
Hongjian Wang, Daniel Kifer, Corina Graif, and Zhenhui Li. 2016. Crime rate inference with big data. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 635-644.
[17]
Hongjian Wang, Yu-Hsuan Kuo, Daniel Kifer, and Zhenhui Li. 2016. A simple baseline for travel time estimation using large-scale trip data. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 61.
[18]
Hongjian Wang and Zhenhui Li. 2017. Region Representation Learningvia Mobility Flow. In In Proceedings of CIKM'17. CIKM'17, 10 pages.
[19]
Hongjian Wang, Xianfeng Tang, Yu-Hsuan Kuo, Daniel Kifer, and Zhenhui Li. 2019. A Simple Baseline for Travel Time Estimation Using Large-scale Trip Data. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 10, 2, Article 19 (Jan. 2019), 22 pages.
[20]
Hongjian Wang, Huaxiu Yao, Daniel Kifer, Corina Graif, and Zhenhui Li. 2017. Non-Stationary Model for Crime Rate Inference Using Modern Urban Data. IEEE Transactions on Big Data(2017).
[21]
Fei Wu, Hongjian Wang, and Zhenhui Li. 2016. Interpreting traffic dynamics using ubiquitous urban data. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 69.
[22]
Fengli Xu, Yong Li, Huandong Wang, Pengyu Zhang, and Depeng Jin. 2017. Understanding mobile traffic patterns of large scale cellular towers in urban environment. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 25, 2 (2017), 1147-1161.
[23]
Jing Yuan, Yu Zheng, and Xing Xie. 2012. Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and POIs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 186-194.
[24]
Bin Zhang. 2003. Regression clustering. In Data Mining, 2003. ICDM 2003. Third IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 451-458.
[25]
Yu Zheng, Furui Liu, and Hsun-Ping Hsieh. 2013. U-air: When urban air quality inference meets big data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1436-1444.
[26]
Yu Zheng, Tong Liu, Yilun Wang, Yanmin Zhu, Yanchi Liu, and Eric Chang. 2014. Diagnosing New York city's noises with ubiquitous data. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 715-725.
[27]
Yu Zheng, Xiuwen Yi, Ming Li, Ruiyuan Li, Zhangqing Shan, Eric Chang, and Tianrui Li. 2015. Forecasting fine-grained air quality based on big data. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 2267-2276.
[28]
Zillow.com. 2017. Real Estate Value in Chicago. https://www.zillow.com/.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Novel Framework for Joint Learning of City Region Partition and RepresentationACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/365285720:7(1-23)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2024
  • (2023)AIST: An Interpretable Attention-Based Deep Learning Model for Crime PredictionACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/35822749:2(1-31)Online publication date: 12-Apr-2023
  • (2021)Demystifying Deep Learning in Predictive Spatiotemporal Analytics: An Information-Theoretic FrameworkIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems10.1109/TNNLS.2020.301521532:8(3538-3552)Online publication date: Aug-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '19: The World Wide Web Conference
May 2019
3620 pages
ISBN:9781450366748
DOI:10.1145/3308558
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 May 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Region partition
  2. crime prediction
  3. reinforcement learning

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WWW '19
WWW '19: The Web Conference
May 13 - 17, 2019
CA, San Francisco, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Novel Framework for Joint Learning of City Region Partition and RepresentationACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/365285720:7(1-23)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2024
  • (2023)AIST: An Interpretable Attention-Based Deep Learning Model for Crime PredictionACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/35822749:2(1-31)Online publication date: 12-Apr-2023
  • (2021)Demystifying Deep Learning in Predictive Spatiotemporal Analytics: An Information-Theoretic FrameworkIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems10.1109/TNNLS.2020.301521532:8(3538-3552)Online publication date: Aug-2021

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media