Towards a better understanding of students in the entry phase of their studies
Authors: 
Maik Benndorf, Gabriel Kind, Hanna Siewerts, Florian Heinke, Uwe SchneiderAuthors Info & Claims
Maik Benndorf, Gabriel Kind, Hanna Siewerts, Florian Heinke, Uwe SchneiderAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 3, Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
Students starting STEM courses have very heterogeneous knowledge, especially regarding computer science and mathematics. As a result, many students are struggling to keep up with the high demands of higher education institutions, and lecturers are under pressure to compensate for the lack of knowledge without lowering their standards. The struggle to keep up combined with personal worries, as well as doubts regarding studying in general, can lead to uncertainty and frustration. The MINT-KOMPASS project at our institution aims to support students of the STEM study courses during their first semesters and, therefore, tries to minimize problems early on. As part of the project, successive surveys were conducted as well as a statistical analysis of the development of the student's grades. In this paper, we present the results of both as well as two measures implemented to support the students in areas identified as problematic. With the surveys and measures, we try to better understand the needs of our students and, as a result, hope to eventually achieve our long-term goal of supporting the students and relieving the lecturers.
References
[1]
Fernando Alonso, Daniel Manrique, Loc Martinez, and José M. Vines. 2011. How blended learning reduces underachievement in higher education: An experience in teaching computer sciences. IEEE Transactions on Education 54, 3 (2011), 471--478.
[2]
Sandra Augustin-Dittmann and Helga Gotzmann. 2014. MINT gewinnt Schülerinnen: Erfolgsfaktoren von Schülerinnen-Projekten in MINT. Springer-Verlag.
[3]
Tino Bargel. 2015. Studieneingangsphase und heterogene Studentenschaft - neue Angebote und ihr Nutzen: Befunde des 12. Studierendensurveys an Universitäten und Fachhochschulen. Technical Report 83. Hochschulforschung AG Universität Konstanz.
[4]
Jeffrey C. Carver, Lisa Henderson, Lulu He, Julia Hodges, and Donna Reese. 2007. Increased retention of early computer science and software engineering students using pair programming. Software Engineering Education Conference, Proceedings (2007), 115--122.
[5]
Michele Dischino, James A DeLaura, Judith Donnelly, Nicholas M Massa, and Fenna Hanes. 2011. Increasing the STEM Pipeline through Problem-Based Learning. Technology Interface International Journal 12, 1 (2011), 21--29.
[6]
Jürgen Dittmann, Katrin A. Geneuss, Christoph Nennstiel, and Nora A. Quast. 2003. Schreibprobleme im Studium: Eine empirische Untersuchung. In Wissenschaftlich schreiben - lehren und lernen, Konrad Ehlich and Angelika Steets (Eds.). De Gruyter, Berlin, 155--185.
[7]
Scott Freeman, Sarah L. Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K. Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 23 (2014), 8410--8415.
[8]
Judith Grützmacher and Janka Willige. [n.d.]. Die Studieneingangsphase aus Studierendensicht: Ergebnisse aus dem Studienqualitätsmonitor 2015.
[9]
Michael Haungs, Christopher Clark, John Clements, and David Janzen. 2012. Improving first-year success and retention through interest-based CS0 courses. SIGCSE'12 - Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (2012), 589--594.
[10]
Ulrich Heublein. 2014. Student Drop-out from German Higher Education Institutions. European Journal of Education 49, 4 (2014), 497--513.
[11]
Ulrich Heublein, Julia Ebert, Christopher Hutzsch, Sören Isleib, Richard König, Johanna Richter, and Andreas Woisch. 2017. Zwischen Studienerwartungen und Studienwirklichkeit: Ursachen des Studienabbruchs, beruflicher Verbleib der Studienabbrecherinnen und Studienabbrecher und Entwicklung der Studienabbruchquote an deutschen Hochschulen. Forum Hochschule, Vol. 2017, 1. DZHW Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung, Hannover.
[12]
Ulrich Heublein and Robert Schmelzer. 2018. Die Entwicklung der Studienabbruchquoten an den deutschen Hochschulen: Berechnungen auf der Basis des Absolventenjahrgangs 2016. Technical Report. Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung, Hannover. https://www.dzhw.eu/pdf/21/studienabbruchquoten_absolventen_2016.pdf
[13]
Tobias Jenert, Liisa Postareff, Taiga Brahm, and Sari Lindblom-YlaUnne. 2015. Editorial: Enculturation and development of beginning students. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung 10, 4 (2015).
[14]
Shi-Jer Lou, Ru-Chu Shih, C. Ray Diez, and Kuo-Hung Tseng. 2011. The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: an exploratory study among female Taiwanese senior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 21, 2 (2011), 195--215.
[15]
Lauren E. Margulieux, Briana B. Morrison, and Adrienne Decker. 2020. Reducing withdrawal and failure rates in introductory programming with subgoal labeled worked examples. International Journal of STEM Education 7, 1 (2020).
[16]
Scheila Wesley Martins, Antonio Jose Mendes, and Antonio Dias Figueiredo. 2010. A strategy to improve student's motivation levels in Programming courses. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE (2010), 1--7.
[17]
Charlie McDowell, Linda Werner, Heather E. Bullock, and Julian Fernald. 2006. Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality. Commun. ACM 49, 8 (2006), 90--95.
[18]
Heather Pon-Barry, Audrey St John, Becky Wai Ling Packard, and Chris Stephenson. 2017. Addressing the CS capacity challenge by improving undergraduate peer mentoring. ACM Inroads 8, 3 (2017), 43--47.
[19]
Leo Porter, Dennis Bouvier, Quintin Cutts, Scott Grissom, Cynthia Lee, Robert McCartney, Daniel Zingaro, and Beth Simon. 2016. A multi-institutional study of peer instruction in introductory computing. ACM Inroads 7, 2 (2016), 76--81.
[20]
Leo Porter, Mark Guzdial, Charlie McDowell, and Beth Simon. 2013. Success in Introductory Programming: What Works? Commun. ACM 56, 8 (2013), 34--36.
[21]
Chris Stephenson, Alison Derbenwick Miller, Christine Alvarado, Lecia Barker, Valerie Barr, Tracy Camp, Carol Frieze, Colleen Lewis, Erin Cannon Mindell, Lee Limbird, Debra Richardson, Mehran Sahami, Elsa Villa, Henry Walker, and Stuart Zweben. 2018. Retention in Computer Science Undergraduate Programs in the U.S.: Data Challenges and Promising Interventions. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
[22]
Peter Stephenson, Joan Peckham, Jean Yves Hervé, Ron Hutt, and L. Miguel Encarnação. 2006. Increasing student retention in computer science through research programs for undergraduates. ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Educators Program, SIGGRAPH '06 (2006).
[23]
Caroline Trautwein and Elke Bosse. 2017. The first year in higher education---critical requirements from the student perspective. Higher Education 73, 3 (2017), 371--387.
[24]
Arto Vihavainen, Matti Paksula, and Matti Luukkainen. 2011. Extreme apprenticeship method in teaching programming for beginners. SIGCSE'11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (2011), 93--98.
- Towards a better understanding of students in the entry phase of their studies
Recommendations
Understanding engineering students for better recruitment strategies: a four-year study
FIE '00: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Frontiers in Education - Volume 01Engineering enrollments are declining. Interest in engineering is near a 20 year low among entering college freshmen. At the same time, the demand for engineering in the US is great, with foreign national students being brought to our country to help ...
Understanding Professional Identities and Goals of Computer Science Undergraduate Students
SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationUnderstanding professional goals and identities of undergraduate Computer Science (CS) students is critical for curriculum decisions, workforce development, and retention programs. This paper aims to explore the ways in which undergraduate CS students ...
Case Studies of Use: Creating Counselor Champions for Change in K12 Computing Education (Abstract Only)
SIGCSE '15: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationCounselors for Computing leverages the National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT)'s organizational membership, applies evidence-based approaches for professional development, and monitors and adjusts practices to make inroads into CS ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2020 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 22 March 2021
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
CSERC '20
CSERC '20: the 9th Computer Science Education Research Conference
October 19 - 20, 2020
Virtual Event, Netherlands
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 24 of 60 submissions, 40%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 35Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)5
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in