Privacy Interventions and Education (PIE): Encouraging Privacy Protective Behavioral Change Online
Authors: 
Garrett Smith, Kirsten Chapman, Zainab Agha, Janet Ruppert, Spring Cullen, Sushmita Khan, 
Bart Knijnenburg, 
Jessica Vitak, 
Priya C. Kumar, 
Pamela J. Wisniewski, Xinru PageAuthors Info & Claims
Garrett Smith, Kirsten Chapman, Zainab Agha, Janet Ruppert, Spring Cullen, Sushmita Khan, Bart Knijnenburg, Jessica Vitak, Priya C. Kumar, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Xinru PageAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 361, Pages 1 - 5
References
[1]
Zainab Agha, Zinan Zhang, Oluwatomisin Obajemu, Luke Shirley, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2022. A Case Study on User Experience Bootcamps with Teens to Co-Design Real-Time Online Safety Interventions. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1–8.
[2]
Mamtaj Akter, Amy J Godfrey, Jess Kropczynski, Heather R Lipford, and Pamela J Wisniewski. 2022. From Parental Control to Joint Family Oversight: Can Parents and Teens Manage Mobile Online Safety and Privacy as Equals?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW1(2022), 1–28.
[3]
Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, David Cherry, and Marie Jarrell. [n. d.]. Testing a comic-based privacy policy.
[4]
Zahra Ashktorab and Jessica Vitak. 2016. Designing cyberbullying mitigation and prevention solutions through participatory design with teenagers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3895–3905.
[5]
BROOKE AUXIER. 2020. How Americans see digital privacy issues amid the COVID-19 outbreak. Retrieved Oct 14, 2022 from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/05/04/how-americans-see-digital-privacy-issues-amid-the-covid-19-outbreak/
[6]
Moritz Büchi, Noemi Festic, Natascha Just, and Michael Latzer. 2021. Digital inequalities in online privacy protection: effects of age, education and gender. In Handbook of digital inequality. Edward Elgar Publishing, 296–310.
[7]
PEW RESEARCH CENTER. 2019. Americans and Privacy: Concerned, Confused and Feeling Lack of Control Over Their Personal Information. Retrieved Oct 14, 2022 from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/11/15/americans-and-privacy-concerned-confused-and-feeling-lack-of-control-over-their-personal-information/
[8]
Brian X. Chen. 2021. The Battle for Digital Privacy Is Reshaping the Internet. Retrieved Oct 14, 2022 from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/16/technology/digital-privacy.html
[9]
Serge Egelman, Julia Bernd, Gerald Friedland, and Dan Garcia. 2016. The teaching privacy curriculum. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. 591–596.
[10]
Mary Forehand. 2010. Bloom’s taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology 41, 4(2010), 47–56.
[11]
Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Kaileigh Angela Byrne, Pamela J Wisniewski, Xinru Page, and Bart Knijnenburg. 2021. To disclose or not to disclose: examining the privacy decision-making processes of older vs. younger adults. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.
[12]
Murat Kezer, Barış Sevi, Zeynep Cemalcilar, and Lemi Baruh. 2016. Age differences in privacy attitudes, literacy and privacy management on Facebook. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 10, 1(2016).
[13]
Bart P Knijnenburg. 2013. Simplifying privacy decisions: Towards interactive and adaptive solutions. In Decisions@ RecSys. Citeseer, 40–41.
[14]
Bart P Knijnenburg, Nicole Bannister, and Kelly Caine. [n. d.]. Using Mathematically-Grounded Metaphors to Teach AI-Related Cybersecurity.
[15]
Spyros Kokolakis. 2017. Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & security 64(2017), 122–134.
[16]
Priya Kumar, Jessica Vitak, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L Clegg, Jonathan Yang, Brenna McNally, and Elizabeth Bonsignore. 2018. Co-designing online privacy-related games and stories with children. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on interaction design and children. 67–79.
[17]
Priya C Kumar, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L Clegg, and Jessica Vitak. 2019. Privacy and security considerations for digital technology use in elementary schools. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[18]
Priya C Kumar, Mega Subramaniam, Jessica Vitak, Tamara L Clegg, and Marshini Chetty. 2020. Strengthening children’s privacy literacy through contextual integrity. Media and Communication 8, 4 (2020), 175–184.
[19]
Kiron Lebeck, Kimberly Ruth, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. 2018. Towards security and privacy for multi-user augmented reality: Foundations with end users. In 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE, 392–408.
[20]
Jialiu Lin, Shahriyar Amini, Jason I Hong, Norman Sadeh, Janne Lindqvist, and Joy Zhang. 2012. Expectation and purpose: understanding users’ mental models of mobile app privacy through crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on ubiquitous computing. 501–510.
[21]
Aleecia M McDonald and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2008. The cost of reading privacy policies. Isjlp 4(2008), 543.
[22]
Nora McDonald, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Morgan G Ames, Nicola Dell, Elizabeth Keneski, Manya Sleeper, and Pamela J Wisniewski. 2020. Privacy and power: Acknowledging the importance of privacy research and design for vulnerable populations. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.
[23]
Moses Namara, Henry Sloan, and Bart P Knijnenburg. 2021. The Effectiveness of Adaptation Methods in Improving User Engagement and Privacy Protection on Social Network Sites. (2021).
[24]
Xinru Page, Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Bart P Knijnenburg, and Pamela J Wisniewski. 2019. Pragmatic tool vs. relational hindrance: Exploring why some social media users avoid privacy features. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–23.
[25]
ANDREW PERRIN. 2020. Half of Americans have decided not to use a product or service because of privacy concerns. Retrieved Oct 14, 2022 from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/14/half-of-americans-have-decided-not-to-use-a-product-or-service-because-of-privacy-concerns/
[26]
Afsaneh Razi, Zainab Agha, Neeraj Chatlani, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2020. Privacy Challenges for Adolescents as a Vulnerable Population. In Networked Privacy Workshop of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[27]
Luke Stark, Jen King, Xinru Page, Airi Lampinen, Jessica Vitak, Pamela Wisniewski, Tara Whalen, and Nathaniel Good. 2016. Bridging the gap between privacy by design and privacy in practice. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3415–3422.
[28]
Alexa Stein, Norman Makoto Su, and Xinru Page. 2020. Learning through Videos: Uncovering Approaches to Educating People about Facebook Privacy. In Proceedings of the 16th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. USENIX.
[29]
Eran Toch, Pamela J Wisniewski, Daricia Wilkinson, Moses Namara, and Karla Badillo-Urquiola. 2018. Moving Beyond A “One-Size Fits All” Approach: Exploring Individual Differences In Privacy. (2018).
[30]
Sabine Trepte, Doris Teutsch, Philipp K. Masur, Carolin Eicher, Mona Fischer, Alisa Hennhöfer, and Fabienne Lind. 2015. Do People Know About Privacy and Data Protection Strategies? Towards the ’Online Privacy Literacy Scale’ (OPLIS). In Reforming European Data Protection Law, Serge Gutwirth, Ronald Leenes, and Paul de Hert (Eds.). Law, Governance and Technology Series, Vol. 20. Springer Dordrecht, 333–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9385-8_14 Place: Dordrecht Publisher: Springer Netherlands.
[31]
Jessica Vitak, Pamela Wisniewski, Xinru Page, Airi Lampinen, Eden Litt, Ralf De Wolf, Patrick Gage Kelley, and Manya Sleeper. 2015. The future of networked privacy: challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 267–272.
[32]
Jessica Vitak, Michael Zimmer, Anna Lenhart, Sunyup Park, Richmond Y. Wong, and Yaxing Yao. 2021. Designing for Data Awareness: Addressing Privacy and Security Concerns About “Smart” Technologies. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 364–367.
[33]
Pamela J Wisniewski, Bart P Knijnenburg, and Heather Richter Lipford. 2017. Making privacy personal: Profiling social network users to inform privacy education and nudging. International Journal of human-computer studies 98 (2017), 95–108.
[34]
Yaxing Yao, Justin Reed Basdeo, Smirity Kaushik, and Yang Wang. 2019. Defending my castle: A co-design study of privacy mechanisms for smart homes. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–12.
[35]
Tianqing Zhu, Dayong Ye, Wei Wang, Wanlei Zhou, and Philip Yu. 2020. More than privacy: Applying differential privacy in key areas of artificial intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2020).
Index Terms
- Privacy Interventions and Education (PIE): Encouraging Privacy Protective Behavioral Change Online
Recommendations
What do online behavioral advertising privacy disclosures communicate to users?
WPES '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic societyOnline Behavioral Advertising (OBA), the practice of tailoring ads based on an individual's online activities, has led to privacy concerns. In an attempt to mitigate these privacy concerns, the online advertising industry has proposed the use of OBA ...
An analytical framework for online privacy research
An analytical framework is suggested for interdisciplinary online privacy research.Websites managers views and knowledge is a neglected topic in privacy research.Websites managers indicate that their own websites do not violate users privacy.The younger ...
Privacy Protection Based Privacy Conflict Detection and Solution in Online Social Networks
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy, and Trust - Volume 8533Online Social Networks (OSNs) such as Facebook, Twitter, and so on recently are major impact in communication and social interaction. Users can share any information with others. However, they have concerns about losing privacy due to lack of an ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
April 2023
3914 pages
ISBN:9781450394222
DOI:10.1145/3544549
Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 19 April 2023
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CHI '23
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%
Upcoming Conference
CHI 2025
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 211Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)110
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format