Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Understanding Technology Support for Organizational Transactive Memory: Requirements, Application, and Customization

Published: 01 April 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Transactive memory is an effective mechanism for locating and coordinating expertise in small groups and has been shown to hold numerous benefits for groups and organizations. To extend transactive memory beyond the scope of small groups, researchers have proposed the use of information technology IT. This paper provides an integrated discussion of our knowledge from three studies concerning IT support in transactive memory in organizations. Focusing on meta-memory, which is at the heart of transactive memory systems, we examine what meta-memory is maintained by members of transactive memory systems, whether providing this meta-memory in a technology-mediated environment can lead to transactive memory development, whether IT can realistically provide this meta-memory, and whether different requirements exist for different users and in different stages of transactive memory development. We discuss the implications of these studies to both research and practice.

References

[1]
Abrams, L. C.; Cross, R.; Lesser, E.; and Levin, D. Z. Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 4 2003, 64-77.
[2]
Adler, M., and Ziglio, E. Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. London: Jessica Kingsley, 1996.
[3]
Akgun, A. E.; Byrne, J. C.; Keskin, H.; and Lynn, G. S. Transactive memory system in new product development teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53, 1 2006, 95-111.
[4]
Akgun, A. E.; Byrne, J.; Keskin, H.; Lynn, G. S.; and Imamoglu, S. Z. Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective. Information & Management, 42, 8 2005, 1105-1120.
[5]
Alavi, M., and Tiwana, A. Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 53, 12 2002, 1029-1037.
[6]
Anand, V.; Manz, C. C.; and Glick, W. H. An organizational memory approach to information management. Academy of Management Review, 23, 4 1998, 796-809.
[7]
Austin, J. R. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5 2003, 866-878.
[8]
Borgatti, S. P., and Cross, R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49, 4 2003, 432-445.
[9]
Boulos, M. N. K., and Wheeler, S. The emerging Web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 24, 1 2007, 2-23.
[10]
Brancheau, J. C., and Wetherbe, J. C. Key issues in information systems management. MIS Quarterly, 11, 1 1987, 23-45.
[11]
Brandon, D. P., and Hollingshead, A. B. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15, 6 2004, 633-644.
[12]
Burt, R. S. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[13]
Burt, R. S., and Knez, M. Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and Society, 7, 3 1995, 255-292.
[14]
Cross, R., and Cummings, J. N. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 6 2004, 928-937.
[15]
Cross, R., and Sproull, L. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15, 4 2004, 446-462.
[16]
Damianos, L. E.; Cuomo, D.; Griffith, J.; Hirst, D. M.; and Smallwood, J. Exploring the adoption, utility, and social influences of social bookmarking in a corporate environment. In R. H. Sprague ed., Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2007.
[17]
Efimova, L., and Grudin, J. Crossing boundaries: A case study of employee blogging. In R. H. Sprague ed., Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2007.
[18]
Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6 1973, 1360-1380.
[19]
Green, P. E., and Rao, V. R. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 3 1971, 355-363.
[20]
Green, P. E., and Srinivasan, V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54, 4 1990, 3-19.
[21]
Griffith, T. L.; Sawyer, J. E.; and Neale, M. A. Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 2 2003, 265-287.
[22]
Hair, J. F.; Anderson, R. E.; Tatham, R. L.; and Black, W. C. Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
[23]
Hollingshead, A. B. Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 3 1998, 659-671.
[24]
Hollingshead, A. B. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 6 2001, 1080-1089.
[25]
Jackson, A.; Yates, J.; and Orlikowski, W. Corporate blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk. In R. H. Sprague ed., Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2007.
[26]
Jackson, P., and Klobas, J. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Implications for knowledge directories. Decision Support Systems, 44, 2 2008, 409-424.
[27]
Kachra, A., and White, R. E. Know-how transfer: The role of social, economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 4 2008, 425-445.
[28]
Kaiser, S.; Muller-Seitz, G.; Lopes, M. G.; and Pinae Cunha, M. Weblog-technology as a trigger to elicit passion for knowledge. Organization, 14, 3 2007, 391-412.
[29]
Kanawattanachai, P., and Yoo, Y. The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31, 4 2007, 783-808.
[30]
Lee, S.; Hwang, T.; and Lee, H. Corporate blogging strategies of the Fortune 500 companies. Management Decision, 44, 3 2006, 316-334.
[31]
Levin, D. Z., and Cross, R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 11 2004, 1477-1490.
[32]
Lewis, K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 4 2003, 587-604.
[33]
Lewis, K. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50, 11 2004, 1519-1533.
[34]
Lewis, K.; Lange, D.; and Gillis, L. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16, 6 2005, 581-598.
[35]
Liang, D. W.; Moreland, R.; and Argote, L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 4 1995, 384-393.
[36]
Lin, C. Y.; Cao, N.; Liu, S. X.; Papadimitriou, S.; Sun, J.; and Yan, X. SmallBlue: Social network analysis for expertise search and collective intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Data Engineering. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1483-1486.
[37]
Louviere, J. J. Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988.
[38]
Majchrzak, A.; Wagner, C.; and Yates, D. Corporate wiki users: Results of a survey. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis. New York: ACM Press, 2006, pp. 99-104.
[39]
Mayer, R. C.; Davis, J. H.; and Schoorman, F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 3 1995, 709-734.
[40]
McCullough, D. A user's guide to conjoint analysis. Marketing Research, 14, 2 2002, 18-23.
[41]
Moreland, R. L., and Argote, L. Transactive memory in dynamic organizations. In R. P. E. Mannix ed., Leading and Managing People in the Dynamic Organization. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003, pp. 135-162.
[42]
Muller, M. J.; Ehrlich, K.; and Farrell, S. "Social tagging and self-tagging for impression management." IBM Research technical report TR 06-02, Cambridge, MA available at <a target="_blank" href='http://www.research.ibm.com/cambridge/'>www.research.ibm.com/cambridge/</a>
[43]
Nevo, D., and Wand, Y. Organizational memory information systems: A transactive memory approach. Decision Support Systems, 39, 4 2005, 549-562.
[44]
Nevo, D.; Benbasat I.; and Wand, Y. Exploring meta-knowledge for knowledge management systems: A Delphi study. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2003 availabel at <a target="_blank" href='http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2003/37/'>http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2003/37/</a>
[45]
Nevo, D.; Benbasat, I.; and Wand, Y. Who knows what? Wall Street Journal October 26, 2009.
[46]
Nevo, D.; Benbasat I.; and Wand, Y. The knowledge demands of expertise seekers in two different contexts: Knowledge allocation versus knowledge retrieval. Decision Support Systems 2012, forthcoming.
[47]
Orlikowski, W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7, 1 1995, 63-92.
[48]
Parameswaran, M., and Whinston, A. B. Research issues in social computing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 6 2007, 336-350.
[49]
Peltokorpi, V. Transactive memory directories in small work units. Personnel Review, 33, 4 2004, 446-467.
[50]
Reagans, R.; Argote, L.; and Brooks, D. Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Science, 51, 6 2005, 869-881.
[51]
Ren, Y.; Carley, K. M.; and Argote, L. The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Science, 52, 5 2006, 671-682.
[52]
Rulke, D. L., and Rau, D. Investigating the encoding process of transactive memory development in group training. Group & Organizations Management, 25, 4 2000, 373-396.
[53]
Sadat, N. S.; Ehrlich, K.; and Millen, D. R. Pick me! Link selection in expertise search results. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2008, pp. 1089-1092.
[54]
Schmidt, R.; Lyytinen, K.; Keil, M.; and Cule, P. Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 4 Spring 2001, 5-36.
[55]
Schuler, D. Social computing. Communications of the ACM, 37, 1 1994, 28-29.
[56]
Shepherd, D. A. Venture capitalists' assessment of new venture survival. Management Science, 45, 5 1999, 621-632.
[57]
Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J., Jr. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
[58]
Smith, H. A., and McKeen, J. D. Developments in practice XXVI: Social networks: Knowledge management's "killer app"? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 1 2007, 611-621.
[59]
Tiwana, A.; Keil, M.; and Fichman, R. G. Information systems project continuation in escalation situations: A real options model. Decision Sciences, 37, 3 2006, 357-391.
[60]
Wasko, M. M., and Faraj, S. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29, 1 2005, 35-57.
[61]
Wathen, N. C., and Burkell, J. Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 2 2002, 134-144.
[62]
Wattal, S.; Racherla, P.; and Mandviwalla, M. Network externalities and technology use: A quantitative analysis of intraorganizational blogs. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 1 Summer 2010, 145-174.
[63]
Wegner, D. M. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen and G. R. Goethals eds., Theories of Group Behavior. New York: Springer, 1986, pp. 185-208.
[64]
Whitener, E. M.; Brodt, S. E.; Korsgaard, M. A.; and Werner, J. M. Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23, 3 1998, 513-530.
[65]
Wittink, D. R., and Cattin, P. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update. Journal of Marketing, 53, 3 1989, 91-96.
[66]
Yoo, Y., and Kanawattanachai, P. Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 2 2001, 187-208.
[67]
Yuan, Y. C.; Fulk, J.; and Monge, P. R. Access to information in connective and communal transactive memory systems. Communications Research, 34, 2 2007, 131-155.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Recognizing Experts on Social MediaACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/3353401.335340650:3(66-84)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2019
  • (2017)Digitally enabled disaster responseInformation Systems Journal10.1111/isj.1211427:2(197-232)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017
  • (2015)Towards a framework for untangling complexityJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2317666:2(392-407)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Technology Support for Organizational Transactive Memory: Requirements, Application, and Customization
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Publisher

    M. E. Sharpe, Inc.

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 April 2012

    Author Tags

    1. Expertise Location
    2. Meta-Memory
    3. Social Media
    4. Transactive Memory

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2019)Recognizing Experts on Social MediaACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/3353401.335340650:3(66-84)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2019
    • (2017)Digitally enabled disaster responseInformation Systems Journal10.1111/isj.1211427:2(197-232)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017
    • (2015)Towards a framework for untangling complexityJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2317666:2(392-407)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media