Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Semantic Technologies for Semantic Applications. Part 2. Models of Comparative Text Semantics

Published: 01 December 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Abstract—

Both parts of this paper discuss the basic aspects of semantic computing, semantic technologies, and semantic applications applied to NL-text big data processing for knowledge extracting and decision making. The basic components of the corresponding systems and technologies are reviewed, which include ontologies and semantic models of their use, semantic resources, and semantic component. The semantic resources contain knowledge about the semantics and means for refinement of this semantics. The semantic component of the technology is used to formally describe the meaning of NL-entities and numerically evaluate their pairwise semantic similarity. The main focus of this part is on numerical models of pairwise semantic similarity of NL-entities. These models are important for solving tasks of text semantic clustering and classification and their various applications. Various types of semantic relatedness and semantic similarity measures for NL-entities in the context of semantic computing tasks are discussed and compared. Problems that constrain the practical use of semantic technologies for the development of semantic applications are analyzed.

References

[1]
Meng L., Huang R., and Gu J. A review of semantic similarity measures in WordNet Int. J. Hybrid Inf. Technol. 2013 6 1-12
[2]
Feng, Y., Bagheri, E., Ensan, F., and Jovanovic, J., The state of the art in semantic relatedness: A framework for comparison, Knowl. Eng. Rev., 2017, vol. 32.
[3]
Leacock C. and Chodorow M. Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification, WordNet Electron. Lexical Database 1998 49 265-283
[4]
Wu, Z. and Palmer, M., Verbs semantics and lexical selection, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, 1994, pp. 133–138.
[5]
Li Y., Bandar Z., and Mclean D. An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2003 15 871-882
[6]
Resnik, P., Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy, Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, 1995, vol. 1, pp. 448–453.
[7]
Lin, D., An information-theoretic definition of similarity, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, San Francisco, CA, 1998, pp. 296–304.
[8]
Jiang, J.J. and Conrath, D.W., Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy, Proceedings of the 10th Research on Computational Linguistics International Conference, 1997, pp. 19–33.
[9]
Parkhomenko P.A., Grigor’yev A.A., and Astrakhantsev N.A. Review and experimental comparison of text clustering methods Tr. Inst. Sist. Program. Ross. Akad. Nauk 2017 29 161-200
[10]
Zhu G. and Iglesias C.A. Computing semantic similarity of concepts in knowledge graphs IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2017 29 72-85
[11]
Gabrilovich, E. and Markovitch, S., Computing semantic relatedness using Wikipedia-based explicit semantic analysis, Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI ’07), Sangal, R., Mehta, H., and Bagga, R.K., Eds., 2007, pp. 1606–1611.
[12]
Tversky A. Features of similarity Psychol. Rev. 1977 84 327-352
[13]
Lesk, M., Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: How to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone, Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation (SIGDOC ’86), 1986, pp. 24–26.
[14]
Vasilescu, F., Langlais, P., and Lapalme, G., Evaluating variants of the Lesk approach for disambiguating words, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), 2004, pp. 633–636.
[15]
Morris J. and Hirst G. Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text Comput. Linguist. 1991 17 21-43
[16]
Wei T., Lu Y., Chang H., Zhou Q., and Bao X. A semantic approach for text clustering using WordNet and lexical chains Expert Syst. Appl. 2015 42 2264-2275
[17]
Tkach, S.S., Application of lexical chains for solving lexical polysemy based on the Russian Wiki Dictionary, Master’s (Philol.) Thesis, Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk State University, 2016.
[18]
Mitra, M., Singhal, A., and Buckley, C., Improving automatic query expansion, Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1998, pp. 206–214.
[19]
Sahami, M. and Heilman, T.D., A web-based kernel function for measuring the similarity of short text snippets, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’06), 2006, pp. 377–386.
[20]
Cilibrasi R.L. and Vitanyi P. The Google similarity distance IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2007 19 370-383
[21]
Vereshchagin, N.K., Uspenskii, V.A., and Shen’, A., Kolmogorovskaya slozhnost’ i sluchaynost’ (Kolmogorov Complexity and Randomness), Moscow: MTsNMO, 2013.
[22]
Bollegala, D., Yutaka Matsuo, Y., and Ishizuka, M., WebSim: A web-based semantic similarity measure, The 21st Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 2007, pp. 1–4.
[23]
Wong W., Liu W., and Bennamoun M. Tree-traversing ant algorithm for term clustering based on featureless similarities Data Mining Knowl. Discovery 2007 15 349-381
[24]
Bartussek W., Bense H., Hoppe T., Humm B.G., Reibold A., Schade U., Siegel M., and Walsh P. Semantic Applications. Methodology, Technology, Corporate Use 2018
[25]
Gorodetskiy V.I. and Serebryakov S.V. Methods and algorithms of collective recognition Autom. Remote Control 2008 69 1821-1851

Index Terms

  1. Semantic Technologies for Semantic Applications. Part 2. Models of Comparative Text Semantics
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image Scientific and Technical Information Processing
            Scientific and Technical Information Processing  Volume 47, Issue 6
            Dec 2020
            58 pages

            Publisher

            Springer-Verlag

            Berlin, Heidelberg

            Publication History

            Published: 01 December 2020
            Received: 02 February 2019

            Author Tags

            1. semantic technology
            2. semantic computing
            3. semantic resource
            4. comparative semantics
            5. semantic relatedness
            6. semantic similarity

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • 0
              Total Citations
            • 0
              Total Downloads
            • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
            Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            View Options

            View options

            Get Access

            Login options

            Media

            Figures

            Other

            Tables

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media