Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2833227.2833252acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Generalized quantum arthur-merlin games

Published: 17 June 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of interaction and coins in quantum Arthur-Merlin games(also called public-coin quantum interactive proof systems). While the existing model restricts the messages from the verifier to be classical even in the quantum setting, the present work introduces a generalized version of quantum Arthur-Merlin games where the messages from the verifier can be quantum as well: the verifier can send not only random bits, but also halves of EPR pairs. This generalization turns out to provide several novel characterizations of quantum interactive proof systems with a constant number of turns. First, it is proved that the complexity class corresponding to two-turn quantum Arthur-Merlin games where both of the two messages are quantum, denoted qq-QAM in this paper, does not change by adding a constant number of turns of classical interaction prior to the communications of qq-QAM proof systems. This can be viewed as a quantum analogue of the celebrated collapse theorem for AM due to Babai. To prove this collapse theorem, this paper presents a natural complete problem for qq-QAM: deciding whether the output of a given quantum circuit is close to a totally mixed state. This complete problem is on the very line of the previous studies investigating the hardness of checking properties related to quantum circuits, and thus, qq-QAM may provide a good measure in computational complexity theory. It is further proved that the class qq-QAM1, the perfect-completeness variant of qq-QAM, gives new bounds for standard well-studied classes of two-turn quantum interactive proof systems. Finally, the collapse theorem above is extended to comprehensively classify the role of classical and quantum interactions in quantum Arthur-Merlin games: it is proved that, for any constant m ≥ 2, the class of problems having m-turn quantum Arthur-Merlin proof systems is either equal to PSPACE or equal to the class of problems having two-turn quantum Arthur-Merlin proof systems of a specific type, which provides a complete set of quantum analogues of Babai's collapse theorem.

References

[1]
Scott Aaronson, Salman Beigi, Andrew Drucker, Bill Fefferman, and Peter Shor. The power of unentanglement. Theory of Computing, 5:1--42 (article 1), 2009.
[2]
Dorit Aharonov. A simple proof that Toffoli and Hadamard are quantum universal. arXiv.org e-Print archive, arXiv:quant-ph/0301040, 2003.
[3]
Dorit Aharonov, Alexei Kitaev, and Noam Nisan. Quantum circuits with mixed states. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 20--30, 1998.
[4]
László Babai. Trading group theory for randomness. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 421--429, 1985.
[5]
Salman Beigi, Peter Shor, and John Watrous. Quantum interactive proofs with short messages. Theory of Computing, 7:101--117 (article 7), 2011.
[6]
Avraham Ben-Aroya, Oded Schwartz, and Amnon Ta-Shma. Quantum expanders: Motivation and constructions. Theory of Computing, 6:47--79 (article 3), 2010.
[7]
Jin-Yi Cai. Lectures in computational complexity, August 2012. Available at http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~jyc/710/book.pdf.
[8]
André Chailloux, Dragos Florin Ciocan, Iordanis Kerenidis, and Salil Vadhan. Interactive and noninteractive zero knowledge are equivalent in the help model. In Theory of Cryptography, Fifth Theory of Cryptography Conference, TCC 2008, volume 4948 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 501--534, 2008. A full version available as Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2007/467, 2007.
[9]
Shafi Goldwasser, Silvio Micali, and Charles Rackoff. The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 18(1):186--208, 1989.
[10]
Shafi Goldwasser and Michael Sipser. Private coins versus public coins in interactive proof systems. In Silvio Micali, editor, Randomness and Computation, volume 5 of Advances in Computing Research, pages 73--90. JAI Press, 1989.
[11]
Gustav Gutoski. Quantum Strategies and Local Operations. PhD thesis, David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, 2009. arXiv.org e-Print archive, arXiv:1003.0038 {quant-ph}.
[12]
Patrick Hayden, Kevin Milner, and Mark M. Wilde. Two-message quantum interactive proofs and the quantum separability problem. Quantum Information and Computation, 14(5-6):0384--0416, 2014.
[13]
Rahul Jain, Zhengfeng Ji, Sarvagya Upadhyay, and John Watrous. QIP = PSPACE. Journal of the ACM, 58(6):article 30, 2011.
[14]
Rahul Jain, Sarvagya Upadhyay, and John Watrous. Two-message quantum interactive proofs are in PSPACE. In 50th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 534--543, 2009.
[15]
Stephen P. Jordan, Hirotada Kobayashi, Daniel Nagaj, and Harumichi Nishimura. Achieving perfect completeness in classical-witness quantum Merlin-Arthur proof systems. Quantum Information and Computation, 12(5-6):0461--0471, 2012.
[16]
Alexei Kitaev and John Watrous. Parallelization, amplification, and exponential time simulation of quantum interactive proof systems. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 608--617, 2000.
[17]
Alexei Yu. Kitaev, Alexander H. Shen, and Mikhail N. Vyalyi. Classical and Quantum Computation, volume 47 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, 2002.
[18]
Hirotada Kobayashi. Non-interactive quantum perfect and statistical zero-knowledge. In Algorithms and Computation, 14th International Symposium, ISAAC 2003, volume 2906 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 178--188, 2003.
[19]
Hirotada Kobayashi, François Le Gall, and Harumichi Nishimura. Generalized quantum Arthur-Merlin games. arXiv.org e-Print archive, arXiv:1312.4673v2 {quant-ph}, 2014.
[20]
Hirotada Kobayashi, François Le Gall, and Harumichi Nishimura. Stronger methods of making quantum interactive proofs perfectly complete. SIAM Journal on Computing, 44(2):243--289, 2015.
[21]
Hirotada Kobayashi, Keiji Matsumoto, and Tomoyuki Yamakami. Quantum Merlin-Arthur proof systems: Are multiple Merlins more helpful to Arthur? Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science, 2009:article 3, 2009.
[22]
Clemens Lautemann. BPP and the polynomial hierarchy. Information Processing Letters, 17(4):215--217, 1983.
[23]
Carsten Lund, Lance Fortnow, Howard Karloff, and Noam Nisan. Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems. Journal of the ACM, 39(4):859--868, 1992.
[24]
Chris Marriott and John Watrous. Quantum Arthur-Merlin games. Computational Complexity, 14(2):122--152, 2005.
[25]
Michael A. Nielsen and Isaac L. Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[26]
Christos H. Papadimitriou. Games against nature. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 31(2):288--301, 1985.
[27]
Bill Rosgen and John Watrous. On the hardness of distinguishing mixed-state quantum computations. In Twentieth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 344--354, 2005.
[28]
Adi Shamir. IP = PSPACE. Journal of the ACM, 39(4):869--877, 1992.
[29]
Alexander Shen. IP = PSPACE: Simplified proof. Journal of the ACM, 39(4):878--880, 1992.
[30]
Yaoyun Shi. Both Toffoli and Controlled-NOT need little help to do universal quantum computing. Quantum Information and Computation, 3(1):084--092, 2003.
[31]
Peter W. Shor. Fault-tolerant quantum computation. In 37th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 56--65, 1996.
[32]
John Watrous. Capturing quantum complexity classes via quantum channels. Talk at the 6th Workshop on Quantum Information Processing, December 2002.
[33]
John Watrous. Limits on the power of quantum statistical zero-knowledge. In 43rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 459--468, 2002.
[34]
John Watrous. PSPACE has constant-round quantum interactive proof systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 292(3):575--588, 2003.
[35]
John Watrous. Zero-knowledge against quantum attacks. SIAM Journal on Computing, 39(1):25--58, 2009.
[36]
Stephanie Wehner. Entanglement in interactive proof systems with binary answers. In STACS 2006, 23rd Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, volume 3884 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 162--171, 2006.
[37]
Mark M. Wilde. Quantum Information Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
CCC '15: Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Computational Complexity
June 2015
682 pages
ISBN:9783939897811

Sponsors

  • Microsoft Research: Microsoft Research

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik

Dagstuhl, Germany

Publication History

Published: 17 June 2015

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Arthur-Merlin games
  2. complete problems
  3. entanglement
  4. interactive proof systems
  5. quantum computing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 1
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media