research-article

Integrating Citizen Experiences in Cultural Heritage Archives: Requirements, State of the Art, and Challenges

Authors:

Rossana Damiano,

Marilena Daquino,

Belen Diaz Agudo,

Anna Maria Marras,

Delfina Martinez Pandiani,

Paul Mulholland,

Sofia Pescarin,

Alan WeckerAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH), Volume 15, Issue 1

Article No.: 11, Pages 1 - 35

https://doi.org/10.1145/3477599

Published: 22 January 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Digital archives of memory institutions are typically concerned with the cataloguing of artefacts of artistic, historical, and cultural value. Recently, new forms of citizen participation in cultural heritage have emerged, producing a wealth of material spanning from visitors’ experiential feedback on exhibitions and cultural artefacts to digitally mediated interactions like the ones happening on social media platforms. Citizen curation is proposed in the context of the European project SPICE (Social Participation, Cohesion, and Inclusion through Cultural Engagement) as a methodology for producing, collecting, interpreting, and archiving people’s responses to cultural objects, with the aim of favouring the emergence of multiple, sometimes conflicting, viewpoints and motivating users and memory institutions to reflect upon them. We argue that citizen curation urges to rethink the nature of computational infrastructures supporting data management of memory institutions, bringing novel challenges that include issues of distribution, authoritativeness, interdependence, privacy, and rights management. To approach these issues, we survey relevant literature toward a distributed, Linked Data infrastructure, with a focus on identifying the roles and requirements involved in such an infrastructure. We show how existing research can contribute significantly in facing the challenges raised by citizen curation and discuss challenges and opportunities from the socio-technical standpoint.

References

[1]

John Arwe, Steve Speicher, and Ashok Malhotra. 2015. Linked Data Platform 1.0. W3C Recommendation. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-ldp-20150226/.

[2]

Stavroula Bampatzia, Angeliki Antoniou, George Lepouras, Costas Vasilakis, and Manolis Wallace. 2016. Using social media to stimulate history reflection in cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP’16). 89–92.

[3]

Jo Bates, Yu-Wei Lin, and Paula Goodale. 2016. Data journeys: Capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows. Big Data Soc. 3, 2 (2016), 2053951716654502.

[4]

Bogdan Batrinca and Philip C. Treleaven. 2015. Social media analytics: A survey of techniques, tools and platforms. Ai Soc. 30, 1 (2015), 89–116.

Digital Library

[5]

Peter Bazalgette. 2017. The Empathy Instinct: How to Create a More Civil Society. Hachette UK.

[6]

Agiatis Benardou, Erik Champion, Costis Dallas, and Lorna Hughes. 2017. Cultural Heritage Infrastructures in Digital Humanities. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315575278

[7]

V. Richard Benjamins, Pompeu Casanovas, Joost Breuker, and Aldo Gangemi. 2005. Law and the semantic web, an introduction. In Law and the Semantic Web. Springer, 1–17.

Digital Library

[8]

Sara R. Benson and Hannah Stitzlein. 2020. Copyright and digital collections: A data-driven roadmap for rights statement success. Coll. Res. Libr. 81, 5 (2020), 753.

[9]

Ames Bielenberg, Lara Helm, Anthony Gentilucci, Dan Stefanescu, and Honggang Zhang. 2012. The growth of diaspora-a decentralized online social network in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’12) Workshops. IEEE, 13–18.

[10]

Tobias Blanke, Conny Kristel, and Laurent Romary. 2015. Crowds for clouds: Recent trends in humanities research infrastructures. arXiv:1601.00533. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.00533.

[11]

Chiara Bonacchi, Andrew Bevan, Adi Keinan-Schoonbaert, Daniel Pett, and Jennifer Wexler. 2019. Participation in heritage crowdsourcing. Museum Manage. Curatorship 34, 2 (2019), 166–182.

[12]

Piero A. Bonatti, Sabrina Kirrane, Iliana M. Petrova, and Luigi Sauro. 2020. Machine understandable policies and GDPR compliance checking. arXiv:2001.08930. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08930.

[13]

Piero A. Bonatti and Daniel Olmedilla. 2007. Rule-based policy representation and reasoning for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Summer School Conference on Reasoning Web (RW’07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 240–268.

Digital Library

[14]

Vladia Borissova. 2018. Cultural heritage digitization and related intellectual property issues. J. Cult. Herit. 34 (2018), 145–150.

[15]

Sonja Buchegger, Doris Schiöberg, Le-Hung Vu, and Anwitaman Datta. 2009. PeerSoN: P2P social networking: Early experiences and insights. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM EuroSys Workshop on Social Network Systems. ACM, Nuremberg, 46–52.

Digital Library

[16]

Anna Caceres, Andreas Weber, and Lambert Schomaker. 2020. MONK in practice: Indexing heterogeneous handwritten collections. In Proceedings of the 7th Digital Humatities Benelux 2020, Vol. 7. DH Benelux, Leiden, Netherlands.

[17]

Sarven Capadisli and Amy Guy. 2017. Linked Data Notifications. W3C Recommendation. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-ldn-20170502/.

[18]

Cristian Cardellino, Serena Villata, Fabien Gandon, Guido Governatori, Brian Lam, and Antonino Rotolo. 2014. Licentia: A tool for supporting users in data licensing on the web of data. In Proceedings of the ISWC’14 Posters & Demonstrations Track within the 13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’14), Matthew Horridge, Marco Rospocher, and Jacco van Ossenbruggen (Eds.). Riva del Garda, Italy.

Digital Library

[19]

Tim Causer and Melissa Terras. 2014. Crowdsourcing bentham: Beyond the traditional boundaries of academic history. Int. J. Human. Arts Comput. 8, 1 (2014), 46–64.

[20]

Shihabur Rahman Chowdhury, Arup Raton Roy, Maheen Shaikh, and Khuzaima Daudjee. 2015. A taxonomy of decentralized online social networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 8, 3 (2015), 367–383.

[21]

Leucio Antonio Cutillo, Refik Molva, and Thorsten Strufe. 2009. Safebook: A privacy-preserving online social network leveraging on real-life trust. IEEE Commun. Mag. 47, 12 (2009), 94–101.

Digital Library

[22]

Paulo Pinheiro da Silva, Silva Deborah, Deborah L. McGuinness, and Rob Mccool. 2003. Knowledge provenance infrastructure. In Bull. IEEE Comput. Soc. Techn. Committ. Data Eng. IEEE.

[23]

Enrico Daga. 2018. The Datanode Ontology v0.5. Retrieved from http://purl.org/datanode/0.5/ns/.

[24]

Enrico Daga, Mathieu d’Aquin, Alessandro Adamou, and Enrico Motta. 2016. Addressing exploitability of smart city data. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2’16). IEEE, 1–6.

[25]

Enrico Daga, Mathieu d’Aquin, Aldo Gangemi, and Enrico Motta. 2015. Propagation of policies in rich data flows. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge Capture. 1–8.

Digital Library

[26]

Enrico Daga, Mathieu d’Aquin, and Enrico Motta. 2017. Propagating data policies: A user study. In Proceedings of the Knowledge Capture Conference. 1–8.

Digital Library

[27]

Enrico Daga, Mathieu d’Aquin, Aldo Gangemi, and Enrico Motta. 2014. Describing semantic web applications through relations between data nodes. Technical Report kmi-14–05, Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University (2014).

[28]

Enrico Daga, Mathieu d’Aquin, Enrico Motta, and Aldo Gangemi. 2015. A bottom-up approach for licences classification and selection. In The Semantic Web: ESWC 2015 Satellite Events. Springer, Portorož, Slovenia.

Digital Library

[29]

Enrico Daga, Aldo Gangemi, and Enrico Motta. 2018. Reasoning with data flows and policy propagation rules. Semantic Web 9, 2 (2018), 163–183.

[30]

Beth Daley. 2019. Curated by Europeana—and the People of Europe. Retrieved from https://pro.europeana.eu/post/curated-by-europeana-and-the-people-of-europe.

[31]

Conseil de l’Europe. 2006. Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society: Faro, 27. X. 2005. Éd. du Conseil de l’Europe, Faro.

[32]

Angelica Lo Duca, Clara Bacciu, and Andrea Marchetti. 2020. The use of blockchain for digital archives: A comparison between ethereum and hyperledger (AIUCD 2019). Umanist. Digit. 4, 8 (2020).

[33]

Stuart Dunn and Mark Hedges. 2014. How the crowd can surprise us: Humanities crowdsourcing and the creation of knowledge. Crowdsourc. Cult. Herit. (2014), 231–246.

[34]

Esra Erdin, Eric Klukovich, Gurhan Gunduz, and Mehmet Hadi Gunes. 2015. Posn: A personal online social network. In Proceedings of the IFIP International Information Security and Privacy Conference. Springer, 51–66.

[35]

Europeana. [n.d.]. Search. Retrieved from https://www.europeana.eu/en/search.

[36]

Europeana. 2020. The Europeana Platform: Europe’s Digital Cultural Collection for Responsible, Accessible, Sustainable and Innovative Tourism. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/europeana-platform-europes-digital-cultural-collection-responsible-accessible-sustainable-and.

[37]

Adrienne Fletcher and Moon J. Lee. 2012. Current social media uses and evaluations in American museums. Museum Manage. Curatorship 27, 5 (2012), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2012.738136

[38]

Nuno Freire, Glen Robson, Antoine Isaac, Hugo Manguinhas, and John B. Howard. 2017. Web technologies: A survey of their applicability to metadata aggregation in cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing (ELPUB’17). 235–244.

[39]

Julien Genestoux and Aaron Parecki. 2018. WebSub. W3C Recommendation. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-websub-20180123/.

[40]

Elisa Giaccardi. 2012. Heritage and Social Media: Understanding Heritage in a Participatory Culture. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.

[41]

Tarleton Gillespie. 2010. The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media Soc. 12, 3 (2010), 347–364.

[42]

Guido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo, Serena Villata, and Fabien Gandon. 2013. One license to compose them all. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’13). Springer, 151–166.

Digital Library

[43]

Kalman Graffi, Christian Gross, Dominik Stingl, Daniel Hartung, Aleksandra Kovacevic, and Ralf Steinmetz. 2011. LifeSocial. KOM: A secure and P2P-based solution for online social networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC’11). IEEE, 554–558.

[44]

Adeline Granet, Benjamin Hervy, Geoffrey Roman-Jimenez, Marouane Hachicha, Emmanuel Morin, Harold Mouchère, Solen Quiniou, Guillaume Raschia, Françoise Rubellin, and Christian Viard-Gaudin. 2018. Crowdsourcing-based annotation of the accounting registers of the italian comedy. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’18). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 446,450.

[45]

International Rights Statements Working Group, et al. 2015. Recommendations for standardized international rights statements. Retrieved from rightsstatements.org/files/160208recommendations_for_ standardized_international_rights_statements_v1 1.

[46]

Ramanathan V. Guha, Dan Brickley, and Steve Macbeth. 2016. Schema.org: Evolution of structured data on the web. Commun. ACM 59, 2 (2016), 44–51.

Digital Library

[47]

Barbara Guidi, Tobias Amft, Andrea De Salve, Kalman Graffi, and Laura Ricci. 2016. DiDuSoNet: A P2P architecture for distributed Dunbar-based social networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 9, 6 (2016), 1177–1194.

[48]

Barbara Guidi, Marco Conti, Andrea Passarella, and Laura Ricci. 2018. Managing social contents in decentralized online social networks: A survey. Online Soc. Netw. Media 7 (2018), 12–29.

[49]

Juliet L. Hardesty. 2014. Exhibiting library collections online: Omeka in context. New Libr. World (2014).

[50]

Dick Hardt et al. 2012. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework. Technical Report. RFC 6749, October.

Digital Library

[51]

Bernhard Haslhofer, Simeon Warner, Carl Lagoze, Martin Klein, Robert Sanderson, Michael L. Nelson, and Herbert Van de Sompel. 2013. ResourceSync: Leveraging sitemaps for resource synchronization. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. 11–14.

Digital Library

[52]

Mark Hedges and Stuart Dunn. 2017. Academic Crowdsourcing in the Humanities: Crowds, Communities and Co-production. Chandos Publishing.

[53]

Amanda Hill, Mark Kretzschmar, David Morton, and Sara Raffel. 2018. “Eenie Meenie Miney Mose”: Using experimental citizen curating to engage visitors with racial ephemera. Florida Stud. Rev. (2018), 62.

[54]

Renato Iannella. 2001. Open digital rights management. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C’01) DRM Workshop. W3C.

[55]

Renato Iannella, Michael Steidl, Stuart Myles, and Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel. 2017. ODRL Version 2.2 Ontology. Technical Report. W3C.

[56]

ICOM. 2020. Museum Definition. Retrieved from https://icom.museum/en/resources/standards-guidelines/museum-definition.

[57]

Bente Jensen. 2013. Instagram as cultural heritage: User participation, historical documentation, and curating in Museums and archives through social media. In Proceedings of the Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage’13), Vol. 2. IEEE, 311–314.

[58]

Lizzy Jongma and Chris Dijkshoorn. 2016. Accurator: Enriching collections with expert knowledge from the crowd. In Proceedings of the Museums and the Web Conference.

[59]

Sabrina Kirrane, Serena Villata, and Mathieu d’Aquin. 2018. Privacy, security and policies: A review of problems and solutions with semantic web technologies. Semantic Web 9, 2 (2018), 153–161.

Digital Library

[60]

David Koll, Jun Li, and Xiaoming Fu. 2014. Soup: An online social network by the people, for the people. In Proceedings of the 15th International Middleware Conference. 193–204.

Digital Library

[61]

David Koll, Jun Li, and Xiaoming Fu. 2017. The good left undone: Advances and challenges in decentralizing online social networks. Comput. Commun. 108 (2017), 36–51.

[62]

Zois Koukopoulos, Dimitrios Koukopoulos, and Jason J. Jung. 2017. A trustworthy multimedia participatory platform for cultural heritage management in smart city environments. Multimedia Tools Appl. 76, 24 (2017), 25943–25981.

Digital Library

[63]

Nicolas Kourtellis, Joshua Finnis, Paul Anderson, Jeremy Blackburn, Cristian Borcea, and Adriana Iamnitchi. 2010. Prometheus: User-controlled p2p social data management for socially-aware applications. In Proceedings of the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Distributed Systems Platforms and Open Distributed Processing. Springer, Springer, 212–231.

Digital Library

[64]

Ho-Pun Lam and Guido Governatori. 2009. The making of SPINdle. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web. Springer, 315–322.

Digital Library

[65]

Luciana Lazzeretti, Andrea Sartori, and Niccolò Innocenti. 2015. Museums and social media: The case of the museum of natural history of florence. Int. Rev. Publ. Nonprofit Market. 12, 3 (2015), 267–283.

[66]

Jin Woo Lee, Yikyung Kim, and Soo Hee Lee. 2019. Digital museum and user experience: The case of Google art & culture. In Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Electronic Art.

[67]

Jasmine Li. 2020. Omeka classic vs. Omeka. net. Emerg. Libr. Inf. Perspect. 3, 1 (2020), 232–236.

[68]

Dongtao Liu, Amre Shakimov, Ramón Cáceres, Alexander Varshavsky, and Landon P. Cox. 2011. Confidant: Protecting OSN data without locking it up. In Proceedings of the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Distributed Systems Platforms and Open Distributed Processing. Springer, 61–80.

Digital Library

[69]

Google LLC. About Google Arts and Culture. Retrieved October 25, 2020 from https://about.artsandculture.google.com/experience/.

[70]

Peter Lyman and Brewster Kahle. 1998. Archiving digital cultural artifacts. D-lib Mag. 4, 7 (1998).

[71]

Deborah Maron and Melanie Feinberg. 2018. What does it mean to adopt a metadata standard? A case study of Omeka and the Dublin Core. J. Document. (2018).

[72]

Barry J. Mauer. 2017. The citizen curating project confronts the pulse nightclub shooting. St. John’s Univ. Humanit. Rev. 14, 1 (2017).

[73]

D. McCarthy and A. Wallace. 2018. Survey of GLAM open access policy and practice. Cortex 18 (2018), 2020.

[74]

Lucy McKenna, Christophe Debruyne, and Declan O’Sullivan. 2018. Understanding the position of information professionals with regards to linked data: A survey of libraries, archives and museums. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE, 7–16.

Digital Library

[75]

Heather Moqtaderi. 2019. Citizen curators: Crowdsourcing to bridge the academic/public divide. Univ. Museums Collect. J. 11, 2 (2019), 204–210.

[76]

Rammohan Narendula, Thanasis G. Papaioannou, and Karl Aberer. 2012. A decentralized online social network with efficient user-driven replication. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and International Confernece on Social Computing. IEEE, 166–175.

Digital Library

[77]

Dominic Oldman and Diana Tanase. 2018. Reshaping the knowledge graph by connecting researchers, data and practices in ResearchSpace. In Proceedings of the 17th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’18),Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11137, Denny Vrandecic, Kalina Bontcheva, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Valentina Presutti, Irene Celino, Marta Sabou, Lucie-Aimée Kaffee, and Elena Simperl (Eds.). Springer, 325–340. DOI:

Digital Library

[78]

Alessandro Oltramari, Dhivya Piraviperumal, Florian Schaub, Shomir Wilson, Sushain Cherivirala, Thomas B. Norton, N. Cameron Russell, Peter Story, Joel Reidenberg, and Norman Sadeh. 2018. PrivOnto: A semantic framework for the analysis of privacy policies. Semantic Web 9, 2 (2018), 185–203.

Digital Library

[79]

Johan Oomen and Lora Aroyo. 2011. Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain: opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. 138–149.

Digital Library

[80]

Trevor Owens. 2013. Digital cultural heritage and the crowd. Curator 56, 1 (2013), 121–130.

[81]

Antonio Padilla-Meléndez and Ana Rosa del Águila-Obra. 2013. Web and social media usage by museums: Online value creation. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 33, 5 (2013), 892–898.

[82]

Aaron Parecki. 2017. Webmention. W3C Recommendation. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-webmention-20170112/.

[83]

Sandra Payette and Carl Lagoze. 1998. Flexible and extensible digital object and repository architecture (FEDORA). In Proceedings of the European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, Second European Conference (ECDL’98). Springer, 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49653-X_4

Digital Library

[84]

Tassilo Pellegrini, Victor Mireles, Simon Steyskal, Oleksandra Panasiuk, Anna Fensel, and Sabrina Kirrane. 2018. Automated rights clearance using semantic web technologies: The DALICC framework. In Semantic Applications. Springer, 203–218.

[85]

Europeana Pro. 2020. GIF It Up. Retrieved from https://pro.europeana.eu/page/gif-it-up.

[86]

Laurel Ptak. 2009. Click!: A crown-curated exhibition. Aperture194 (2009), 12–12.

[87]

Riccardo Pucella and Vicky Weissman. 2006. A formal foundation for ODRL. arXiv:cs/0601085.

[88]

Eric Raymond. 1999. The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowl. Technol. Policy 12, 3 (1999), 23–49.

[89]

Jason Reed, M. Jordan Raddick, Andrea Lardner, and Karen Carney. 2013. An exploratory factor analysis of motivations for participating in Zooniverse, a collection of virtual citizen science projects. In Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE610–619.

Digital Library

[90]

Peter Ride. 2013. Creating#citizencurators: Putting Twitter into museum showcases. In Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium of Electronic Art (ISEA’13). ISEA International.

[91]

Mia Ridge. 2013. From tagging to theorizing: Deepening engagement with cultural heritage through crowdsourcing. Curator 56, 4 (2013), 435–450.

[92]

Victor Rodriguez-Doncel, Serena Villata, and Asunción Gómez-Pérez. 2014. A dataset of RDF licenses. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX’14). 187–188.

[93]

Henriette Roued-Cunliffe and Andrea Copeland. 2017. Participatory Heritage. Facet Publishing.

[94]

Lea Schick and Katrine Damkjær. 2010. Can you be friends with an art museum? Rethinking the art museum through Facebook. In The Digital Turn. Peter Lang, Tartu, 36.

[95]

David Scott and Richard Sharp. 2002. Abstracting application-level web security. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, ACM, 396–407.

Digital Library

[96]

Seok-Won Seong, Jiwon Seo, Matthew Nasielski, Debangsu Sengupta, Sudheendra Hangal, Seng Keat Teh, Ruven Chu, Ben Dodson, and Monica S. Lam. 2010. PrPl: A decentralized social networking infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing & Services: Social Networks and Beyond. ACM, 1–8. https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/1810931

Digital Library

[97]

Amre Shakimov, Harold Lim, Ramón Cáceres, Landon P. Cox, Kevin Li, Dongtao Liu, and Alexander Varshavsky. 2011. Vis-a-vis: Privacy-preserving online social networking via virtual individual servers. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS’11). IEEE, 1–10.

[98]

Rajesh Sharma and Anwitaman Datta. 2012. Supernova: Super-peers based architecture for decentralized online social networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS’12). IEEE, 1–10.

[99]

Robert Simpson, Kevin R. Page, and David De Roure. 2014. Zooniverse: Observing the world’s largest citizen science platform. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, NY, 1049–1054.

Digital Library

[100]

MacKenzie Smith, Mary R. Barton, Margret Branschofsky, Greg McClellan, Julie Harford Walker, Michael J. Bass, David Stuve, and Robert Tansley. 2003. DSpace: An open source dynamic digital repository. D-Lib Mag. 9, 1 (2003).

[101]

James Snell and Evan Prodromou. 2017. Activity Streams 2.0. W3C Recommendation. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-activitystreams-core-20170523/.

[102]

Jocelyn Spence, Benjamin Bedwell, Michelle Coleman, Steve Benford, Boriana N. Koleva, Matt Adams, Ju Row Farr, Nick Tandavanitj, and Anders Sundnes Løvlie. 2019. Seeing with new Eyes: Designing for in-the-wild museum gifting. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–13.

Digital Library

[103]

Hannah Stitzlein, Myung-Ja K. Han, and Sara R. Benson. 2018. Unraveling challenges: Rights statements in digital cultural heritage collections. J. Libr. Metadata 18, 3–4 (2018), 135–150.

[104]

Sanaz Taheri-Boshrooyeh, Alptekin Küpçü, and Öznur Özkasap. 2015. Security and privacy of distributed online social networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 35th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops. IEEE, 112–119.

Digital Library

[105]

Florian Tegeler, David Koll, and Xiaoming Fu. 2011. Gemstone: Empowering decentralized social networking with high data availability. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM’11). IEEE, IEEE, 1–6.

[106]

Melissa Terras. 2015. Crowdsourcing in the Digital Humanities. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605.ch29

[107]

Jennifer Trant, Bruce Wyman, et al. 2006. Investigating social tagging and folksonomy in art museums with steve.museum. In Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW’06. Edinburgh, Scotland.

[108]

Joris Van Zundert. 2018. On not writing a review about Mirador: Mirador, IIIF, and the epistemological gains of distributed digital scholarly resources. Digit. Medieval. 11, 1 (2018).

[109]

Chris A. Vassiliadis and Zoe-Charis Belenioti. 2017. Museums & cultural heritage via social media: An integrated literature review. Tourismos 12, 3 (2017).

[110]

Konstantinos N. Vavliakis, Georgios Th Karagiannis, and Pericles A. Mitkas. 2012. Semantic web in cultural heritage after 2020. In Proceedings of the 11th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’12). 11–15.

[111]

Serena Villata and Fabien Gandon. 2012. Licenses compatibility and composition in the Web of data. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Consuming Linked Data, Vol. 905. CEUR-WS, 124–135.

Digital Library

[112]

Luis Von Ahn, Benjamin Maurer, Colin McMillen, David Abraham, and Manuel Blum. 2008. recaptcha: Human-based character recognition via web security measures. Science 321, 5895 (2008), 1465–1468.

[113]

Ratri Wahyuningtyas. 2017. Eliminating boundaries in learning culture through technology: A review of Google arts and culture. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Faculty of Language and Arts. 179.

[114]

Christopher Webber and Jessica Tallon. 2018. ActivityPub. W3C Recommendation. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-activitypub-20180123/.

[115]

Alan J. Wecker, Uri Schor, Dror Elovits, Daniel Stoekl Ben Ezra, Tsvi Kuflik, Moshe Lavee, Vered Raziel-Kretzmer, Avigail Ohali, and Lily Signoret. 2019. Tikkoun sofrim: A webapp for personalization and adaptation of crowdsourcing transcriptions. In Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. 109–110.

Digital Library

[116]

Amy Whitaker. 2019. Art and blockchain: A primer, history, and taxonomy of blockchain use cases in the arts. Artivate 8, 2 (2019), 21–46.

[117]

Annie Wu, Santi Thompson, Rachel Vacek, Sean Watkins, and Andrew Weidner. 2016. Hitting the road towards a greater digital destination: Evaluating and testing DAMS at the University of Houston Libraries.

[118]

Kostas Zafiropoulos, Vasiliki Vrana, and Konstantinos Antoniadis. 2015. Use of Twitter and Facebook by top European museums. J. Tour. Herit. Serv. Market. (2015).

[119]

Jamil Zaki. 2019. The War for Kindness: Building Empathy in a Fractured World. Broadway Books.

[120]

Matteo Zignani, Sabrina Gaito, and Gian Paolo Rossi. 2018. Follow the “mastodon”: Structure and evolution of a decentralized online social network. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM’18). AAAI Press, 541–550.

Cited By

Buragohain DMeng YDeng CLi QChaudhary S(2024)Digitalizing cultural heritage through metaverse applications: challenges, opportunities, and strategiesHeritage Science10.1186/s40494-024-01403-112:1Online publication date: 13-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01403-1
Jiménez-Díaz GDiaz-Agudo BBruni LKadastik NFollo ADamiano RStriani MSanchez-Martin ALieto A(2024)Interpretable Clusters for Representing Citizens’ Sense of Belonging through Interaction with Cultural HeritageJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/3665142Online publication date: 22-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3665142
Mulholland PVan Kranenburg PCarvalho JDaga E(2024)Supporting the End-User Curation of Cultural Heritage Knowledge GraphsProceedings of the 35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media10.1145/3648188.3675132(35-44)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3648188.3675132
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Integrating Citizen Experiences in Cultural Heritage Archives: Requirements, State of the Art, and Challenges
1. Applied computing
  1. Arts and humanities
2. Information systems
  1. Information systems applications
    1. Collaborative and social computing systems and tools
    2. Digital libraries and archives

Recommendations

Linked Data and Cultural Heritage: A Systematic Review of Participation, Collaboration, and Motivation
Special Issue on Culture Games and Regular Papers

The cultural heritage sector has traditionally been concerned with sharing resources and furthering human knowledge, with particular interest to the issues associated with metadata and interoperability, especially when it comes to the use of technology. ...
Research challenges for digital archives of 3D cultural heritage models

The increasing creation of 3D cultural heritage models has resulted in a need for the establishment of centralized digital archives. We advocate open repositories of scientifically authenticated 3D models based on the example of traditional scholarly ...
Constructing a semantic wiki for living cultural heritage: case study of Korean tea culture
IMCOM '15: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication

In recent years, the amount of digital content related to cultural heritage resources has been growing to such a degree that it can now be easily published and distributed. However, such digital content is limited to material manifestations, such as ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage

Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage Volume 15, Issue 1

February 2022

348 pages

ISSN:1556-4673

EISSN:1556-4711

DOI:10.1145/3505194

Editor:
Franco Niccolucci
VAST-LAB at PIN, University of Florence, Italy

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 January 2022

Accepted: 01 July 2021

Revised: 01 May 2021

Received: 01 November 2020

Published in JOCCH Volume 15, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Refereed

Funding Sources

European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreements “SPICE - Social Cohesion, Participation, and Inclusion through Cultural Engagement”

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
1,435
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)590
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)48

Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Buragohain DMeng YDeng CLi QChaudhary S(2024)Digitalizing cultural heritage through metaverse applications: challenges, opportunities, and strategiesHeritage Science10.1186/s40494-024-01403-112:1Online publication date: 13-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01403-1
Jiménez-Díaz GDiaz-Agudo BBruni LKadastik NFollo ADamiano RStriani MSanchez-Martin ALieto A(2024)Interpretable Clusters for Representing Citizens’ Sense of Belonging through Interaction with Cultural HeritageJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/3665142Online publication date: 22-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3665142
Mulholland PVan Kranenburg PCarvalho JDaga E(2024)Supporting the End-User Curation of Cultural Heritage Knowledge GraphsProceedings of the 35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media10.1145/3648188.3675132(35-44)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3648188.3675132
Nimani A(2023)European orientation towards the preservation of cultural heritage in the light of historical losses: Institutional and legal issuesEUROPEAN CHRONICLE10.59430/euch/3.2023.058:3(5-15)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.59430/euch/3.2023.05
Mantzou PBitsikas XFloros A(2023)Enriching Cultural Heritage through the Integration of Art and Digital TechnologiesSocial Sciences10.3390/socsci1211059412:11(594)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12110594
Batista LSouza GJorente M(2023)Digital Curation in the postmodern social perspective: curatorial facets, concepts and participatory techniquesTransinformação10.1590/2318-0889202335e22002435Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202335e220024
Daquino MWigham MDaga EGiagnolini LTomasi F(2023)CLEF. A Linked Open Data Native System for CrowdsourcingJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/359472116:3(1-17)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594721
Asprino LDaga EGangemi AMulholland P(2023)Knowledge Graph Construction with a Façade: A Unified Method to Access Heterogeneous Data Sources on the WebACM Transactions on Internet Technology10.1145/355531223:1(1-31)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555312
Lieto AStriani MGena CDolza EMarras APozzato GDamiano R(2023)A sensemaking system for grouping and suggesting stories from multiple affective viewpoints in museumsHuman–Computer Interaction10.1080/07370024.2023.224235539:1-2(109-143)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2023.2242355
Lieto APozzato GStriani MZoia SDamiano R(2023)DEGARI 2.0Cognitive Systems Research10.1016/j.cogsys.2022.10.00177:C(1-17)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.cogsys.2022.10.001
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Issue’s Table of Contents