Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1536414.1536472acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The detectability lemma and quantum gap amplification

Published: 31 May 2009 Publication History

Abstract

The quantum analogue of the constraint satisfaction problem is the fundamental physics question of finding the minimal energy state of a local Hamiltonian --- each term of the Hamiltonian specifies a local constraint whose violation contributes to the energy of the given quantum state. However, in general it is not meaningful to ask for the probability that a given quantum state violates at least one constraint; the difficulty being that the terms of the Hamiltonian do not commute. We show how to make sense of this notion under mild restrictions on the form of the Hamiltonian. We then provide two main results. We first prove the quantum detectability lemma, which states that the probability of detecting a violation of a constraint in a local Hamiltonian system is bounded from below by some constant times the minimal energy of the system. The proof reveals some intrinsic structure of the Hilbert space of local Hamiltonians, which is captured in the "exponential decay" lemma, and formalized using a novel decomposition of the Hilbert space called the XY decomposition. As an application of the detectability lemma, we prove our second main result: a quantum analogue of the classical gap amplification lemma using random walks over expander graphs, which was the seed for Dinur's celebrated new proof of the PCP theorem [6]. We hope that these results will pave the way to better understandings of the computational properties of local Hamiltonians systems, and to the evolving field of quantum Hamiltonian complexity.

References

[1]
D. Aharonov, I. Arad, Z. Landau, and U. Vazirani. The Detectability Lemma and Quantum Gap Amplification. arXiv:0811.3412, 2008.
[2]
M. Ajtai, J. Komlos, and E. Szemeredi. Deterministic simulation in LOGSPACE. In Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM conference on Theory of computing, pages 132--140. ACM New York, NY, USA, 1987.
[3]
S. Arora and B. Barak. Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach. to appear: http://www.cs.princeton.edu/theory/complexity.
[4]
S. Bravyi. Efficient algorithm for a quantum analogue of 2-SAT. quant-ph/0602108, 2006.
[5]
S. Bravyi, D. DiVincenzo, D. Loss, and B. Terhal. Quantum Simulation of Many-Body Hamiltonians Using Perturbation Theory with Bounded-Strength Interactions. Physical Review Letters, 101(7):70503, 2008.
[6]
I. Dinur. The pcp theorem by gap amplification. J. ACM, 54(3):12, 2007.
[7]
E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser. Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution. arXiv:quant-ph/0001106, 2000.
[8]
R. Impagliazzo and D. Zuckerman. How to recycle random bits. In Foundations of Computer Science, 1989., 30th Annual Symposium on, pages 248--253, 1989.
[9]
S. P. Jordan and E. Farhi. Perturbative gadgets at arbitrary orders. Physical Review A (Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics), 77(6):062329, 2008.
[10]
J. Kempe, A. Kitaev, and O. Regev. The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem. SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 35(5):1070, 2006.
[11]
A. Kitaev, A. Shen, and M. Vyalyi. Classical and Quantum Computation. American Mathematical Society, 2002.
[12]
J. ’Lberg, D. Kult, and E. Sjöqvist. Robustness of the adiabatic quantum search. Physical Review A, 71(6):60312, 2005.
[13]
D. A. Lidar. Towards fault tolerant adiabatic quantum computation. Physical Review Letters, 100(16):160506, 2008.
[14]
C. Marriott and J. Watrous. Quantum arthur-merlin games. Computational Complexity, 14(2):122--152, 2005.
[15]
R. Oliveira and B. Terhal. The complexity of quantum spin systems on a two-dimensional square lattice. Quant. Inf. Comp., 8(10):0900--0924, 2008.
[16]
J. Roland and N. Cerf. Noise resistance of adiabatic quantum computation using random matrix theory. Physical Review A, 71(3):32330, 2005.
[17]
M. Sarandy and D. Lidar. Adiabatic Quantum Computation in Open Systems. Physical Review Letters, 95(25):250503, 2005.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The detectability lemma and quantum gap amplification

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    STOC '09: Proceedings of the forty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
    May 2009
    750 pages
    ISBN:9781605585062
    DOI:10.1145/1536414
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 31 May 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. PCP
    2. QMA
    3. detectability lemma
    4. gap amplification
    5. local hamiltonians
    6. quantum computation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    STOC '09
    Sponsor:
    STOC '09: Symposium on Theory of Computing
    May 31 - June 2, 2009
    MD, Bethesda, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Quantum Merkle TreesQuantum10.22331/q-2024-06-18-13808(1380)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Efficient Verification of Ground States of Frustration-Free HamiltoniansQuantum10.22331/q-2024-01-10-12218(1221)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Entropy Decay for Davies Semigroups of a One Dimensional Quantum LatticeCommunications in Mathematical Physics10.1007/s00220-023-04869-5405:2Online publication date: 10-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Interactive Oracle Arguments in the QROM and Applications to Succinct Verification of Quantum ComputationTopics in Cryptology – CT-RSA 202410.1007/978-3-031-58868-6_16(404-429)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
    • (2023)Commitments to Quantum StatesProceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3564246.3585198(1579-1588)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
    • (2023)NLTS Hamiltonians from Good Quantum CodesProceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3564246.3585114(1090-1096)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Computational advantage of quantum random samplingReviews of Modern Physics10.1103/RevModPhys.95.03500195:3Online publication date: 20-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Rapid Thermalization of Spin Chain Commuting HamiltoniansPhysical Review Letters10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.060401130:6Online publication date: 9-Feb-2023
    • (2022) Random quantum circuits are approximate unitary -designs in depth Quantum10.22331/q-2022-09-08-7956(795)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2022
    • (2022)An area law for 2d frustration-free spin systemsProceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3519935.3519962(12-18)Online publication date: 9-Jun-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media