Considerations for name resolution in heterogeneous mobile networks of the future
Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
The new generation network or future Internet will be heterogeneous not only in terms of link layer technologies but also in network layer protocols and addressing (or locating) schemes. The ID/locator split concept will be applied to the protocol stack so that heterogeneity of the network layer protocols/locators would be hidden from the transport and application layers. The applications identify communication peer hosts by their hostnames or IDs which are mapped to locators as the packets are pushed down the protocol stack. Hosts obtain hostname-to-ID&locator mapping records from hostname registries. The records are updated as mobile hosts move and acquire different locators. In this paper, we discuss a scheme of hostname formation and present some considerations for registering, retrieving, and updating the mapping records so that mobility is supported well in heterogeneous networks of the future.
References
[1]
AKARI Architecture Design Project for New Generation Network, http//akari-project.nict.go.jp
[2]
NSF NeTS FIND (Future Internet Design) Initiative, http://www.nets-find.net
[3]
Global Environment for Network Innovation (GENI), http://www.geni.net/
[4]
The FP7 4WARD Project, http://www.4ward-project.eu
[5]
Future Internet Forum, http://fif.kr
[6]
Kafle, V. P., Otsuki, H. and Inoue, M. 2010. An ID/locator split architecture for future networks. IEEE Commun. Magazine, 48, 2 (Feb. 2010), 138--144.
[7]
Kafle, V. P. and Inoue, M. 2010. HIMALIS: Heterogeneity inclusion and mobility adaptation through locator ID separation in new generation networks. IEICE Trans. on Commun., E93-B, 3 (March 2010), 478--489.
[8]
Moskowitz, R., Nikander, P., Jokela, P. and Henderson, T. 2008. Host identity protocol. RFC 5201.
[9]
Ubillos, J., Xu, M., Ming, Z. and Vogt, C. 2010. Name-based sockets architecture. Internet-Draft, draft-ubillos-namebased-sockets-03. IETF.
[10]
Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D. and Lewis, D. 2011. Locator/ID separation protocol (LISP). Internet-Draft, draftietf-lisp-12. IETF.
[11]
Rosenberg, J. 2002. SIP: Session initiation protocol. RFC 3261.
[12]
Johnson, D., Perkins, C. and Arkko, J. 2004. Mobility support in IPv6. RFC 3775.
[13]
Gundavelli, S. et al. 2008. Proxy mobile IPv6. RFC 5213.
[14]
Devarapalli, V., Wakikawa, R., Petrescu, A. and Thubert, P. 2005. Network mobility (NEMO) basic support protocol. RFC 3969.
[15]
Nordmark, E. and Bagnulo, M. 2009. Shim6: Level 3 multihoming shim protocol for IPv6. RFC 5533.
Index Terms
- Considerations for name resolution in heterogeneous mobile networks of the future
Recommendations
ID-Based Communication Framework in Future Networks
The current Internet has followed a location-based communication paradigm, where IP addresses play a significant role not only in locating hosts or in the routing system, but also in the identification of hosts and services. The location-based, host-...
Design and Implementation of Path Failure Detection and Recovery Mechanism for Multihomed HIMALIS Network
We have designed the Heterogeneity Inclusion and Mobility Adaptation through Locator ID Separation (HIMALIS) network architecture to natively support sessions transfer from one link to another independently of the network and transport layer protocols. ...
Supporting Context-Aware Multiparty Sessions in Heterogeneous Mobile Networks
The article addresses context-aware, adaptive multiparty sessions in a heterogeneous system through such elements as adaptivity and context-awareness. The effective usage of context information can lead to context-aware content casting, especially ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2011 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
- FIF: Future Internet Forum
- OSIA: Open Standards and Internet Association
In-Cooperation
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 13 June 2011
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
CFI '11
Sponsor:
- FIF
- OSIA
CFI '11: 6th International Conference on Future Internet Technologies
June 13 - 15, 2011
Seoul, Republic of Korea
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 29 of 55 submissions, 53%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 118Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)1
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in