research-article

What do we really know about data flow languages?

Author:

PLATEAU 2016: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools

Pages 30 - 31

https://doi.org/10.1145/3001878.3001884

Published: 01 November 2016 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

Over the last years, a number of languages based on data flow abstractions have been proposed in different important areas including Big Data, stream processing, reactive programming, real time analytics. While there is a general agreement that the data flow style simplifies the access to such complex systems compared to low level imperative APIs, this design has been substantiated by little evidence. In this paper, we advocate a systematic investigation of the design principles of data flow languages and suggest important research questions that urge to be addressed.

References

[1]

E. Bainomugisha, A. L. Carreton, T. v. Cutsem, S. Mostinckx, and W. d. Meuter. A survey on reactive programming. ACM Comput. Surv., 45(4):52:1–52:34, Aug. 2013.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

T. R. G. Green and M. Petre. When Visual Programs are Harder to Read than Textual Programs. In In, pages 167–180, 1992.

Google Scholar

[3]

T. D. LaToza and B. A. Myers. Developers ask reachability questions. ICSE ’10. ACM, 2010.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

G. Salvaneschi, S. Amann, S. Proksch, and M. Mezini. An empirical study on program comprehension with reactive programming. FSE 2014. ACM, 2014.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

G. Salvaneschi, P. Eugster, and M. Mezini. Programming with implicit flows. IEEE Software, 31(5):52–59, 2014.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[6]

G. Salvaneschi and M. Mezini. Debugging for reactive programming. ICSE ’16. ACM, 2016.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

J. Siegmund and J. Schumann. Confounding parameters on program comprehension: A literature survey. Empirical Softw. Engg., 20(4), 2015.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

J. Sushine, J. D. Herbsleb, and J. Aldrich. Searching the state space: A qualitative study of API protocol usability. ICPC ’15. IEEE Press, 2015.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

A. von Mayrhauser and A. M. Vans. Comprehension processes during large scale maintenance. ICSE ’94. IEEE, 1994.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

M. Zaharia, T. Das, H. Li, T. Hunter, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica. Discretized streams: Fault-tolerant streaming computation at scale. SOSP ’13. ACM, 2013.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Pereira AGama KZimmerle CCastor F(2023)Reactive Programming with Swift Combine: An Analysis of Problems Faced by Developers on Stack OverflowProceedings of the XXXVII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering10.1145/3613372.3613381(109-115)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613372.3613381
Zimmerle CGama KCastor FFilho JLo DMcIntosh SNovielli N(2022)Mining the usage of reactive programming APIsProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories10.1145/3524842.3527966(203-214)Online publication date: 23-May-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3524842.3527966
Salvaneschi GProksch SAmann SNadi SMezini M(2017)On the Positive Effect of Reactive Programming on Software ComprehensionIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2017.265552443:12(1125-1143)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TSE.2017.2655524

Index Terms

What do we really know about data flow languages?
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software notations and tools
    1. General programming languages
      1. Language features

Recommendations

Reactive programming experience with REScala
Programming '18: Companion Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming

Reactive programming is a recent programming paradigm that specifically targets reactive applications. Over the years, a number of reactive languages have been proposed, with different combinations of features, and various target domains.

...
An empirical study on program comprehension with reactive programming
FSE 2014: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering

Starting from the first investigations with strictly functional languages, reactive programming has been proposed as THE programming paradigm for reactive applications. The advantages of designs based on this style over designs based on the Observer ...
Interactive Programming of Reactive Systems

ReactiveML is a synchronous reactive extension of the general purpose programming language OCaml. It allows to program reactive systems such as video games or simulators. This paper presents rmltop, the ReactiveML counterpart of the OCaml toplevel. This ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

PLATEAU 2016: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools

November 2016

33 pages

ISBN:9781450346382

DOI:10.1145/3001878

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

SIGAda: ACM Special Interest Group on Ada Programming Language

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

SPLASH '16

Sponsor:

SIGPLAN

SPLASH '16: Conference on Systems, Programming, Languages, and Applications: Software for Humanity

November 1, 2016

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 5 of 8 submissions, 63%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
154
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)4
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Pereira AGama KZimmerle CCastor F(2023)Reactive Programming with Swift Combine: An Analysis of Problems Faced by Developers on Stack OverflowProceedings of the XXXVII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering10.1145/3613372.3613381(109-115)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613372.3613381
Zimmerle CGama KCastor FFilho JLo DMcIntosh SNovielli N(2022)Mining the usage of reactive programming APIsProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories10.1145/3524842.3527966(203-214)Online publication date: 23-May-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3524842.3527966
Salvaneschi GProksch SAmann SNadi SMezini M(2017)On the Positive Effect of Reactive Programming on Software ComprehensionIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2017.265552443:12(1125-1143)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TSE.2017.2655524

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Reactive programming experience with REScala

An empirical study on program comprehension with reactive programming

Interactive Programming of Reactive Systems