Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

A Logic of Inductive Implication or Artificial Intelligence Meets Philosophy of Science II

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3501))

  • 1223 Accesses

Abstract

The general purpose of this paper is to demonstrate through a well defined example how philosophy of science and Artificial Intelligence (AI) can benefit from each other by sharing some of their ideas, methods and techniques developed to tackle similar problems. The problem we will focus is the expression of non-deductive inferences, which is performed in AI by the use of nonmonotonic logics, and in philosophy of science by the attempt of constructing inductive logics. After analyzing to what extent one of the most wide spread nonmonotonic formalisms – default logic – can be taken as a logic of induction in the philosophical sense, and carefully considering the similarities and dissimilarities of the problems faced in these contexts, an expanded version of default logic, called by us a logic of logic of inductive implication, is introduced. It is then shown how this new framework can be used to represent different types of inductive calculi that may be of relevance to AI.

This work is partially supported by CNPq trough the LOCIA (Logic, Science and Artificial Intelligence) Project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bèziau, J.Y.: S5 is a Paraconsistent Logic and so is First-Order Classical Logic. Logical Studies 9 (2002), http://www.logic.ru/LogStud/09/No9-01.html

  2. Buchsbaum, A., Pequeno, T., Pequeno, M.: The Logical Expression of Reasoning. In: Béziau, J., Krause, D. (eds.) New Threats in Foundations of Science. Papers Dedicated to the Eightieth Birthday of Patrick Suppes, Kluver, Dordrecht (2005) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carnap, R.: Logical Foundations of Probability. U. of Chicago Press, Chicago (1950)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ford, M., Glymour, C., Hayes, P. (eds.): Android Epistemology. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gabbay, D., Hunter, A.: Making Inconsistency Respectable. In: Jorrand, P., Kelemen, J. (eds.) Proc. of Fundamental of AI Research, pp. 19–32. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hempel, C.G.: Studies in the Logic of Confirmation. Mind 54, 1–26, 97-121 (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Makinson, D.: General Patterns in Nonmonotonic Reasoning. In: Gabbay, D., Hogger, D., Robinson, J. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCarthy, J.: Applications of Circumscription to Formalizing Commonsense Knowledge. Artificial Intelligence 26, 89–116 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Morris, P.H.: The Anomalous Problem in Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 35, 383–399 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Pequeno, T., Buchsbaum, A.: The Logic of Epistemic Inconsistency. In: Allen, J., Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proc. of Second International Conference, pp. 453–460. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Perlis, D.: On the Consistency of Commonsense Reasoning. Computational Intelligence 2, 180–190 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reiter, R.: A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13, 81–132 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Reiter, R., Criscuolo, G.: On Interacting Defaults. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 270–276. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Silvestre, R., Pequeno, T.: A Logical Treatment of Scientific Anomalies or AI Meets Philosophy of Science. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Int. Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 669–675. CSRA Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silvestre, R., Pequeno, T.: Is Plausible Reasoning a Sensible Alternative for Inductive-Statistical Reasoning? In: Bazzan, A.L.C., Labidi, S. (eds.) SBIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3171, pp. 124–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Silvestre, R.S., Pequeno, T.H.C. (2005). A Logic of Inductive Implication or Artificial Intelligence Meets Philosophy of Science II. In: Kégl, B., Lapalme, G. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3501. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11424918_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11424918_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25864-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31952-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics