Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Contrary Positions About Modeling Knowledge Work

  • Conference paper
Professional Knowledge Management (WM 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3782))

Abstract

Modeling for knowledge management (KM) is fundamentally influenced by decisions about which approach, focus, perspectives or modeling language should be used. This paper characterizes three key decisions with regard to what modeling should focus on, which units of description are appropriate and what level of granularity is suited and relates them to a general framework that structures the quality of conceptual modeling. For each decision, contrary positions are highlighted and based on this investigation theses about modeling knowledge work are formulated. It is argued for a more flexible modeling of knowledge work by starting from hot spots of knowledge work with high potential for improvement, using situations as basic units of description and modeling on task level to provide starting points for KM support. The theses developed are related to the concept of knowledge stance that seems to be a promising approach to describe recurring situations of knowledge work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abecker, A., Bernardi, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kühn, O., Sintek, M.: Context-Aware, Proactive Delivery of Task-Specific Knowledge: The KnowMore Project. International Journal on Information Systems Frontiers 2(3), 253–276 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allweyer, T.: Modellbasiertes Wissensmanagement. Information Management 13(1), 37–45 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bach, V., Österle, H., Vogler, P.: Business Knowledge Management in der Praxis. In: Prozessorientierte Lösungen zwischen Knowledge Portal und Kompetenzmanagement. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bardram, J.E.: Plans as Situated Action: An Activity Theory Approach to Workflow Systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Lancaster (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bleek, W.G.: Situations in Life to Support the Use and Modelling of Municipal Information Systems. In: Bleek, W.-G., Dittrich, Y., Eriksen, S (Eds.): Multimode Access to Public Service, Technical Report 2002:14, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deiters, W., Lucas, R., Weber, T.: Skill-Management - Ein Baustein für das Management flexibler Teams. Information Management & Consulting 15(3), 54–60 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E.: Mind Over Machine. In: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. Free Press, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Engeström, Y.: Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-theoretical Perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8(1-2), 63–93 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eppler, M.J.: Making Knowledge Visible Through Intranet Knowledge Maps: Concepts, Elements, Cases. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference in System Sciences (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eppler, M.J.: Managing Information Quality: Increasing the Value of Information in Knowledge-intensive Products and Processes. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferstl, O.K., Sinz, E.J.: From Business Process Modeling to the Specification of Distributed Business Application Systems - An Object-Oriented Approach (Research Paper): Dept. of Business Information Systems, University of Bamberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frank, U.: Multi-Perspective Enterprise Modeling (MEMO) - Conceptual Framework and Modeling Languages. In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-35), Honolulu (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frank, U., van Laak, B.L.: Anforderungen an Sprachen zur Modellierung von Geschäftsprozessen. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gronau, N., Weber, E.: Modeling of Knowledge Intensive Business Processes with the Declaration Language KMDL. In: Khosrow-Pour, M. (ed.) Information Technology and Organizations: Trends, Issues, Challenges and Solutions. Proceedings of the IRMA International Conference, May 18-23, pp. 284–287. Idea Group (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hädrich, T., Maier, R.: Modeling Knowledge Work. In: Chamoni, P., Deiters, W., Gronau, N., Kutsche, R.-D., Loos, P., Müller-Merbach, H., Rieger, B., Sandkuhl, K. (eds.) Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI 2004), University Duisburg-Essen, March 9-11, vol. 2. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft GmbH, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heisig, P.: Business Process Oriented Knowledge Management. In: Mertins, K., Heisig, P., Vorbeck, J. (eds.) Knowledge Management. Concepts and Best Practices, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hinkelmann, K., Karagiannis, D., Telesko, R.: PROMOTE - Methodologie und Werkzeug für geschäftsprozessorientiertes Wissensmanagement. In: Abecker, A., Hinkelmann, K., Maus, H., Müller, H.J. (eds.) Geschäftsprozessorientiertes Wissensmanagement, pp. 65–90. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffmann, M., Goesmann, T., Kienle, A.: Analyse und Unterstützung von Wissensprozessen als Voraussetzung für erfolgreiches Wissensmanagement. In: Abecker, A., Hinkelmann, K., Maus, H., Müller, H.J. (eds.) Geschäftsprozessorientiertes Wissensmanagement, pp. 159–184. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Holsapple, C.W., Joshi, K.D.: Knowledge Manipulation Activities: Results of A Delphi Study. Information & Management 39(6), 477–490 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Junginger, S., Kühn, H., Strobl, R., Karagiannis, D.: Ein Geschäftsprozessmanagement-Werkzeug der nächsten Generation - ADONIS: Konzeption und Anwendungen. Wirtschaftsinformatik 42(5), 392–401 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Karagiannis, D., Telesko, R.: The EU-Project PROMOTE: A Process-Oriented Approach for Knowledge Management. In: Reimer, U. (ed.) PAKM 2000, 3rd International Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kelloway, E.K., Barling, J.: Knowledge Work as Organizational Behavior. International Journal of Management Reviews 2(3), 287–304 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leonard-Barton, D.: Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal 13, 111–125 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling. IEEE Software 11(2), 42–49 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maier, R.: Knowledge Management Systems: Information And Communication Technologies for Knowledge Management, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maier, R., Hädrich, T., Peinl, R.: Enterprise Knowledge Infrastructures. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nardi, B.A.: Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Neumann, R., Stingl, A., Grillitsch, W.: Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Knowledge Management Projects. Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference on Knowledge Management, Dublin, Ireland (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Österle, H.: Business Engineering. Prozeß- und Systementwicklung, Band 1: Entwurfstechniken. Springer, Berlin (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Porter, M.E.: Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schauer, H.: Knowledge MEMO: Eine Methode zur Planung, Steuerung und Kontrolle ganzheitlichen betrieblichen Wissensmanagements. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Koblenz, Koblenz (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS - Modellierungsmethoden, Metamodelle, Anwendungen. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schultze, U.: A Confessional Account of an Ethnography About Knowledge Work. MIS Quarterly 24(1), 3–41 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schultze, U.: On Knowledge Work. In: Holsapple, C.W. (ed.) Handbook on Knowledge Management Knowledge Matters, vol. 1, pp. 43–58. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schwarz, S., Abecker, A., Maus, H., Sintek, M.: Anforderungen an die Workflow-Unterstützung für wissensintensive Geschäftsprozesse. In: Müller, H.J., Abecker, A., Hinkelmann, K., Maus, H. (eds.) WM 2001-Workshop Geschäftsprozeßorientiertes Wissensmanagement, Baden-Baden, Germany, March 14-16 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sinz, E.J.: Modellierung. In: Back, A., Becker, J., König, W., Krallmann, W., Rieger, B., Scheer, A.-W., Seibt, D., Stahlknecht, P., Strunz, H., Thome, R., Wedekind, H. (eds.) Lexikon der Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 312–313. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Spur, G., Mertins, K., Jochem, R.: Integrated Enterprise Modelling. Beuth, Berlin (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Strohmaier, M., Lindstaedt, S.N., Dietrich, W., Koronakis, P.: Knowledge Problems in Process-Oriented Organizations: A Pattern Approach. Paper presented at the 3rd Conference Professional Knowledge Management, Kaiserslautern, Germany, April 10-13 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Strohmaier, M.B.: B-KIDE: A Framework and a Tool for Business Process Oriented Knowledge Infrastructure Development. Institute for Knowledge Management and Knowledge Visualization, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Actions, The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  41. van Elst, L., Aschoff, F.-R., Bernardi, A., Maus, H., Schwarz, S.: Weakly-Structured Workflows for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks: An Experimental Evaluation. Paper presented at the 11th International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, June 9-11, Linz, Austria (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Warnecke, G., Stammwitz, G.: Referenzmodell Wissensmanagement - Ein Ansatz zur modellbasierten Gestaltung wissensorientierter Prozesse. Wirtschaftsinformatik 13(1), 24–29 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wiig, K.M.: A Knowledge Model for Situation-Handling. Journal of Knowledge Management 7(5), 6–24 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Woitsch, R., Karagiannis, D.: Process-Oriented Knowledge Management Systems Based on KM-Services: The PROMOTE Approach. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management 11, 253–267 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06099, Halle (Saale), Germany

    Thomas Hädrich

Authors
  1. Thomas Hädrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Computer Science, University of Hildesheim, Marienburger Platz 22, 31141, Hildesheim, Germany

    Klaus-Dieter Althoff

  2. Knowledge Management Department, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany

    Andreas Dengel

  3. Department of Business Information Systems II, University of Trier, Trier, Germany

    Ralph Bergmann

  4. Department for Experience Management, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, Kaiserslautern

    Markus Nick

  5. Knowledge Management Department, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) GmbH, Trippstadter Straße 122, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany

    Thomas Roth-Berghofer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hädrich, T. (2005). Contrary Positions About Modeling Knowledge Work. In: Althoff, KD., Dengel, A., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T. (eds) Professional Knowledge Management. WM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3782. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11590019_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11590019_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30465-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31620-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation