Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

How to Do Philosophy Informationally

  • Conference paper
Professional Knowledge Management (WM 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3782))

Abstract

In this paper we introduce three methods to approach philosophical problems informationally: Minimalism, the Method of Abstraction and Constructionism. Minimalism considers the specifications of the starting problems and systems that are tractable for a philosophical analysis. The Method of Abstraction describes the process of making explicit the level of abstraction at which a system is observed and investigated. Constructionism provides a series of principles that the investigation of the problem must fulfil once it has been fully characterised by the previous two methods. For each method, we also provide an application: the problem of visual perception, functionalism, and the Turing Test, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bechtel, W., Mundale, J.: Multiple realizability revisited: Linking cognitive and neural states. Philosophy of Science 66, 175–207 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47(1-3), 139–159 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chalmers, D.J.: The Conscious Mind: in Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Child, A.: Making and knowing in hobbes, vico, and dewey. University of California Publications in Philosophy 16(13), 271–310 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cordeschi, R.: The Discovery of the Artificial: Behavior, Mind, and Machines Before and Beyond Cybernetics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Floridi, L.: What is the philosophy of information? Metaphilosophy 33(1-2), 123–145 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Floridi, L.: On the logical unsolvability of the gettier problem. Synthese 142(1), 61–79 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Floridi, L.: Open problems in the philosophy of information. Metaphilosophy 35(4), 554–582 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Floridi, L., Sanders, J.W.: The method of abstraction. In: Negrotti, M. (ed.) Yearbook of the Artificial. Nature, Culture and Technology. Models in contemporary sciences, vol. 2, pp. 177–220. P. Lang, Bern (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greco, G.M., Paronitti, G., Turilli, M., Floridi, L.: The philosophy of information - a methodological point of view. In: Althoff, K.D., Dengel, A., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T. (eds.) WM 2005: Professional Knowledge Management. Experiences and Visions, pp. 563–570. DFKI GmbH, Kaiserslautern (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grim, P.: Computational modeling as a philosophical methodology. In: Floridi, L. (ed.) The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, pp. 337–349. Blackwell, Oxford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adams, M.M.: William Ockham. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Computer science as empirical enquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM 19(3), 113–126 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Noé, A., Thompson, E. (eds.): Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pérez-Ramos, A.: Francis Bacon’s Idea of Science and the Maker’s Knowledge Tradition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Putnam, H.: Psychological predicates. In: Captain, W.H., Merrill, D.D. (eds.) Art, Mind and Religion. Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quine, W.V.O.: Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60(1), 20–43 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Raftopoulos, A.: Cartesian analysis and synthesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 34(2), 265–308 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Rasmussen, S., Barrett, C.L.: Elements of a theory of simulation. In: Moràn, F., Moreno, J.J., Merelo, P., Chacòn, P. (eds.) ECAL 1995. Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 515–529. Springer, Berlin (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. de Roever, W.P., Engelhardt, K.: Data Refinement: Model-oriented Proof Methods and their Comparison. Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Turing, A.M.: Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 49(236), 433–460 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeigler, B.P.: Theory of Modelling and Simulation. Wiley, New York (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Greco, G.M., Paronitti, G., Turilli, M., Floridi, L. (2005). How to Do Philosophy Informationally. In: Althoff, KD., Dengel, A., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T. (eds) Professional Knowledge Management. WM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3782. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11590019_70

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11590019_70

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30465-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31620-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics