Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Mesoscopic Modeling of Emergent Behavior – A Self-organizing Deliberative Minority Game

  • Conference paper
Engineering Self-Organising Systems (ESOA 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3910))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 542 Accesses

Abstract

Recent research discussed several approaches to understand the relation between microscopic agent behavior and macroscopic multi–agent system (MAS) behavior. A structured methodology to derive these models will have impact on MAS design, evaluation and debugging. Current results have established the description of macroscopic behavior, including cooperation, by Rate Equations derived from markovian agent–states transitions. Emergent phenomena elude these descriptions. In this paper, we argue that mesoscopic modeling is needed to provide appropriate descriptions of emergent system behavior. The mesoscopic agent states reflect the emergent behavior and allow for a deliberative implementation of the rules and conditions which cause the MAS to self–organize as wanted. In a case study, we construct such a mesoscopic model for the socio-economic inspired Minority Game. The mesoscopic description leads us to a deliberative implementation, which exhibits equivalent self–organizing behavior, confirming our results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jennings, N.R.: On agent-based software engineering. Artif. Intell. 117, 277–296 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Jennings, N.R.: Building complex, distributed systems: the case for an agent-based approach. Comms. of the ACM 44(4), 35–41 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iglesias, C., Garrijo, M., Gonzalez, J.: A survey of agent-oriented methodologies. In: Rao, A.S., Singh, M.P., Müller, J.P. (eds.) ATAL 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1555, pp. 317–330. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Tveit, A.: A survey of agent-oriented software engineering (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wei, G.: Agent orientation in software engineering. Knowledge Engineering Review 16(4), 349–373 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.C.: Swarm Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parunak, H.V.D.: Making swarming happen. In: Proceedings of Swarming and Networkenabled C4ISR (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ando, Y., Masutani, O., Sasaki, H., Iwasaki, H., Fukazawa, Y., Honiden, S.: Pheromone model: Application to traffic congestion prediction. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Engineering Self-Organising Applications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tatara, E., North, M., Hood, C., Teymour, F., Cinar, A.: Agent–based control of spatially distributed chemical reactor networks. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Engineering Self-Organising Applications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parunak, H.V.D., Brueckner, S., Savit, R.: Universality in multi-agent systems. In: AAMAS 2004: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 930–937. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bordini, R.H., Fisher, M., Visser, W., Wooldridge, M.: Model checking rational agents. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(5), 46–52 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Poutakidis, D., Padgham, L., Winikoff, M.: Debugging multi-agent systems using design artifacts: The case of interaction protocols (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zambonelli, F., Mamei, M., Roli, A.: What can cellular automata tell us about the behavior of large multi-agent systems? In: Garcia, A.F., de Lucena, C.J.P., Zambonelli, F., Omicini, A., Castro, J. (eds.) Software Engineering for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS, vol. 2603, pp. 216–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolf, T.D., Holvoet, T., Samaey, G.: Engineering self-organising emergent systems with simulation-based scientific analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Engineering Self-Organising Applications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brueckner, S., Parunak, H.V.D.: Information-driven phase changes in multi-agent coordination. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Engineering Self-Organising Applications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lerman, K., Galstyan, A.: Automatically modeling group behavior of simple agents. In: Agent Modeling Workshop, AAMAS 2004, New York, NY (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Galstyan, A., Lerman, K.: Analysis of a stochastic model of adaptive task allocation in robots. In: AAMAS 2004, New York, NY (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lerman, K., Galstyan, A.: A general methodology for mathematical analysis of multiagent systems (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lerman, K.: Design and mathematical analysis of agent-based systems. In: Rash, J.L., Rouff, C.A., Truszkowski, W., Gordon, D.F., Hinchey, M.G. (eds.) FAABS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1871, pp. 222–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Agassounon, W., Martinoli, A., Easton, K.: Macroscopic modeling of aggregation experiments using embodied agents in teams of constant and time-varying sizes. Autonomous Robots Journal (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lerman, K., Galstyan, A.: Mathematical model of foraging in a group of robots: Effect of interference. Autonomous Robots 13, 127–141 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lerman, K., Galstyan, A.: Agent memory and adaptation in multi-agent systems. In: AAMAS 2003: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 797–803. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolf, T.D., Holvoet, T.: Emergence and self-organisation: a statement of similarities and differences. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Engineering Self-Organising Applications, pp. 96–110 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Challet, D., Zhang, Y.C.: Emergence of cooperation and organization in an evolutionary game. Physica A 246, 407 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinoli, A., Easton, K.: Modeling swarm robotic systems. In: Siciliano, B., Dario, P. (eds.) Proc. of the Eight Int. Symp. on Experimental Robotics ISER 2002. Number 5 in Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, pp. 297–306 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van Kampen, N.G.: Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. Revised edn. Elsevier Science Pub Co, Amsterdam (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Arthur, W.B.: Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. American Economic Review 84, 406–411 (1994), avilable at http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v84y1994i2p406-11.html.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li, Y., VanDeemen, A., Savit, R.: The minority game with variable payoffs. Physica A 284, 461–477 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Metzler, R., Horn, C.: Evolutionary minority games: the benefits of imitation. Physica 329, 484–498 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson, N., Hui, P., Jonson, R., Lo, T.: Self-organized segregation within an evolving population. Physical Review Letters 82, 3360 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reents, G., Metzler, R., Kinzel, W.: A stochastic strategy for the minority game. Physica A 299, 253–261 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Challet, D., Marsili, M., Zhang, Y.C.: Minority Games - Interacting agents in financial markets. In: Number 0-19-856640-9 in Series: Oxford Finance Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Challet, D.: Competition between adaptive agents: from learning to collective efficiency and back.chapter to appear in Collectives and the design of complex systems. cond-mat/0210319. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xie, Y., Wang, B.H., Hu, C., Zhou, T.: Global Optimization of Minority Game by Smart Agents. ArXiv Condensed Matter e-prints (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhong, L.X., Zheng, D.F., Zheng, B., Hui, P.: Effects of contrarians in the minority game. cond-mat/0412524 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Renz, W., Sudeikat, J.: Modeling minority games with bdi agents - a case study. In: Eymann, T., Klügl, F., Lamersdorf, W., Klusch, M., Huhns, M.N. (eds.) MATES 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3550, pp. 71–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Bazzan, A.L., Bordini, R.H., Andrioti, G.K., Vicari, R.M.: Wayward agents in a commuting scenario (personalities in the minority game). In: Proc. of the Fourth Int. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 2000), Boston. IEEE Computer Science, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bratman, M.E.: Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI-agents: from theory to practice. In: Proceedings of the First Intl. Conference on Multiagent Systems, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rao, A.S.: Agentspeak(l): Bdi agents speak out in a logical computable language. In: Perram, J., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1996. LNCS, vol. 1038, pp. 42–55. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Lamersdorf, W., Moldt, D.: Goal representation for bdi agent systems. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Fallah-Seghrouchni, A.E. (eds.) Second International Workshop on Programming Multiagent Systems: Languages and Tools, pp. 9–20 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Lamersdorf, W.: Jadex: A short overview. In: Main Conference Net.ObjectDays 2004, pp. 195–207 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pokahr, A., Braubach, L., Lamersdorf, W.: Jadex: Implementing a bdiinfrastructure for jade agents. EXP - in search of innovation (Special Issue on JADE) 3, 76–85 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bellifemine, F., Rimassa, G., Poggi, A.: Jade a fipa-compliant agent framework. In: 4th International Conference on the Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (PAAM 1999), London, UK, pp. 97–108 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  45. van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour. In: Proc. RE 2001 - Int. Joint Conference on Requirements Engineering (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Renz, W., Sudeikat, J. (2006). Mesoscopic Modeling of Emergent Behavior – A Self-organizing Deliberative Minority Game. In: Brueckner, S.A., Di Marzo Serugendo, G., Hales, D., Zambonelli, F. (eds) Engineering Self-Organising Systems. ESOA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3910. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11734697_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11734697_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33342-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33352-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics