Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Efficient Partially Blind Signatures with Provable Security

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2006 (ICCSA 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3982))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Blind signatures play a central role in applications such as e-cash and e-voting systems. The notion of partially blind signature is a more applicable variant such that the part of the message contains some common information pre-agreed by the signer and the signature requester in an unblinded form. In this paper, we propose two efficient partially blind signatures with provable security in the random oracle model. The former is based on witness indistinguishable (WI) signatures. Compared with the state-of-the-art construction due to Abe and Fujisaki [1], our scheme is 25% more efficient while enjoys the same level of security. The latter is a partially blind Schnorr signature without relying on witness indistinguishability. It enjoys the same level of security and efficiency as the underlying blind signature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abe, M., Fujisaki, E.: How to date blind signatures. In: Kim, K.-c., Matsumoto, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1163, pp. 244–251. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Abe, M., Okamoto, T.: Provably secure partially blind signatures. In: Bellare, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2000. LNCS, vol. 1880, pp. 271–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Cramer, R., Damgård, I., Schoenmakers, B.: Proof of partial knowledge and simplified design of witness hiding protocols. In: Desmedt, Y.G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1994. LNCS, vol. 839, pp. 174–187. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaum, D.: Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In: Crypto 1982, pp. 199–204. Prenum Publishing Corporation (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chow, S.S.M., Hui, L.C.K., Yiu, S.M., Chow, K.P.: Two improved partially blind signature schemes from bilinear pairings. In: Boyd, C., González Nieto, J.M. (eds.) ACISP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3574, pp. 316–328. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Camenisch, J., Piveteau, J.-M., Stadler, M.: Blind signatures based on the discrete logarithm problem. In: De Santis, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1994. LNCS, vol. 950, pp. 428–432. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Fan, C.I., Lei, C.L.: Low-computation partially blind signatures for electronic cash. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences E81- A(5) , 818–824 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horster, H., Michels, M., Petersen, H.: -message recovery and meta-blind signature schemes based on the discrete logarithm problem and their applications. In: Asiacrypt 1992. LNCS, vol. 917, pp. 224–237. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Juels, A., Luby, M., Ostrovsky, R.: Security of blind digital signatures. In: Kaliski Jr., B.S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1997. LNCS, vol. 1294, pp. 150–164. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Okamoto, T., Ohta, K.: Divertible zero knowledge interactive proofs and commutative random self-reducibility. In: Quisquater, J.-J., Vandewalle, J. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 1989. LNCS, vol. 434, pp. 134–149. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ohta, K., Okamoto, T.: On concrete security treatment of signatures derived from identification. In: Krawczyk, H. (ed.) CRYPTO 1998. LNCS, vol. 1462, pp. 354–369. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pointcheval, D.: Strengthened security for blind signatures. In: Nyberg, K. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1403, pp. 391–405. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Pointcheval, D., Stern, J.: Security arguments for digital signatures and blind signatures. Journal of Cryptology 13(3), 361–396 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Pointcheval, D., Stern, J.: Provably secure blind signature schemes. In: Kim, K.-c., Matsumoto, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1163, pp. 252–265. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Schnorr, C.: Security of blind discrete log signatures against interactive attacks. In: Qing, S., Okamoto, T., Zhou, J. (eds.) ICICS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2229, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner, D.: A generalized birthday problem. In: Yung, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2002. LNCS, vol. 2442, pp. 288–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, F., Kim, K.: Efficient ID-Based blind signature and proxy signature from bilinear pairings. In: Safavi-Naini, R., Seberry, J. (eds.) ACISP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2727, pp. 312–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, F., Safavi-Naini, R., Susilo, W.: Efficient verifiably encrypted signature and partially blind signature from bilinear pairings. In: Johansson, T., Maitra, S. (eds.) INDOCRYPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2904, pp. 191–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Nechaev, V.I.: Complexity of a determinate algorithm for the discrete logarithm. Mathematical Notes 55, 165–172 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Shoup, V.: Low bounds for discrete logarithems and related problems. In: Fumy, W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1233, pp. 256–266. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maitl, G., Boyd, C.: A provably secure restrictive partially blind signature scheme. In: Naccache, D., Paillier, P. (eds.) PKC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2274, pp. 99–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Okamoto, T.: Provably secure and practical identification schemes and corresponding signature schemes. In: Brickell, E.F. (ed.) CRYPTO 1992. LNCS, vol. 740, pp. 31–53. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wu, Q., Susilo, W., Mu, Y., Zhang, F. (2006). Efficient Partially Blind Signatures with Provable Security. In: Gavrilova, M., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2006. ICCSA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3982. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11751595_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11751595_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34075-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34076-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics