Abstract
Most humans cannot detect lies at a rate better than chance. Alternative methods of deception detection may increase accuracy, but are intrusive, do not offer immediate feedback, or may not be useful in all situations. Automated classification methods have been suggested as an alternative to address these issues, but few studies have tested their utility with real-world, high-stakes statements. The current paper reports preliminary results from classification of actual security police investigations collected under high stakes and proposes stages for conducting future analyses.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buller, D.B., Burgoon, J.K.: Interpersonal Deception Theory. Communication Theory 6, 203–242 (1996)
Trovillo, P.V.: A History of Lie Detection. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 29, 848–881 (1939)
Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K.P., Bull, R.: Detecting Deceit Via Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24, 239–263 (2000)
Ekman, P., O’Sullivan, M., Frank, M.G.: A Few Can Catch a Liar. Psychological Science 10, 263–265 (1999)
Zhou, L., Burgoon, J.K., Twitchell, D.P., Qin, T., Nunamaker Jr, J.F.: A Comparison of Classification Methods for Predicting Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Management Information Systems 20, 139–163 (2004)
Zhou, L., Burgoon, J.K., Nunamaker, J.F., Twitchell, D.: Automating Linguistics-Based Cues for Detecting Deception in Text-Based Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communications. Group Decision and Negotiation 13, 81–106 (2004)
Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., Rosenthal, R.: Verbal and Nonverbal Communication of Deception. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 1–59. Academic Press, New York (1981)
DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., Cooper, H.: Cues to Deception. Psychological Bulletin 129, 74–118 (2003)
Zuckerman, M., Driver, R.E.: Telling Lies: Verbal and Nonverbal Correlates of Deception. In: Multichannel Intergration of Nonverbal Behavior. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)
Adkins, M., Twitchell, D.P., Burgoon, J.K., Nunamaker Jr, J.F.: Advances in Automated Deception Detection in Text-based Computer-mediated Communication. In: Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science VIII (2004)
Cunningham, H.: GATE, a General Architecture for Text Engineering. Computers and the Humanities 36, 223–254 (2002)
Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco (2000)
Twitchell, D., Biros, D.P., Forsgren, N., Burgoon, J.K., Nunamaker Jr., J.F.: Assessing the Veracity of Criminal and Detainee Statements: a Study of Real-World Data. In: International Conference on Intelligence Analysis (2005)
Sarle, W.: What are Cross-Validation and Bootstrapping? (2004), Available from, http://www.faqs.org/faqs/aifaq/neural-nets/part3/section-12.html
Twitchell, D., Jensen, M.L., Burgoon, J.K., Nunamaker Jr., J.F.: Detecting deception insecondary screening interviews using linguistic analysis. In: Proceedings of The 7th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 118–123 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fuller, C., Biros, D.P., Adkins, M., Burgoon, J.K., Nunamaker, J.F., Coulon, S. (2006). Detecting Deception in Person-of-Interest Statements. In: Mehrotra, S., Zeng, D.D., Chen, H., Thuraisingham, B., Wang, FY. (eds) Intelligence and Security Informatics. ISI 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3975. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11760146_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11760146_48
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34478-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34479-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)