Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Why Using Structural Hints in XML Retrieval?

  • Conference paper
Flexible Query Answering Systems (FQAS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4027))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

When querying XML collections, users cannot always express their need in a precise way. Systems should therefore support vagueness at both the content and structural level of queries. This paper present a relevance-oriented method for ranking XML components. The aim here is to evaluate whether structural hints help to better answer the user needs. We experiment (within the INEX framework) with users needs expressed in a flexible way (i.e with ou without structural hints). Results show that they clearly improve performance, even if they are expressed in an ”artificial way”. Relevance seems therefore to be closely linked to structure. Moreover, too complex structural hints do not lead to better results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abolhassani, M., Fuhr, N.: Applying the divergence from randomness approach for content-only search in XML documents. In: McDonald, S., Tait, J.I. (eds.) ECIR 2004. LNCS, vol. 2997, pp. 409–419. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Anh, V.N., Moffat, A.: Compression and an IR approach to XML retrieval. In: Proceedings of INEX 2002 Workshop, Dagstuhl, Germany (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandez, M., Malhotra, A., Marsh, J., Nagy, M., Walsh, N.: XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 data model. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), W3C Working Draft (May 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S.: INEX 2003 workshop proceedings (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G.: INEX 2005 workshop pre-proceedings (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fuhr, N., Malik, S., Lalmas, M.: Overview of the initiative for the evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) 2003. In: Proceedings of INEX 2003 Workshop, Dagstuhl, Germany (December 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gövert, N., Abolhassani, M., Fuhr, N., Grossjohann, K.: Content-oriented XML retrieval with hyrex. In: Proceedings of the first INEX Workshop, Dagstuhl, Germany (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grabs, T., Scheck, H.-J.: Flexible information retrieval from xml with PowerDB XML. In: Proceedings in the First Annual Workshop for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX), December 2002, pp. 26–32 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kakade, V., Raghavan, P.: Encoding XML in vector spaces. In: Losada, D.E., Fernández-Luna, J.M. (eds.) ECIR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3408, pp. 96–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamps, J., de Rijke, M., Sigurbjornsson, B.: Length normalization in XML retrieval. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2004, Sheffield, England, pp. 80–87 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kamps, J., Marx, M., de Rijke, M., Sigurbjornsson, B.: Structured queries in XML retrieval. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2005, Bremen, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karen Sauvagnat, M.B., Hlaoua, L.: XFIRM at INEX 2005: Ad-hoc and relevance feedback tracks. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G. (eds.) INEX 2005. LNCS, vol. 3977, pp. 88–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kazai, G., Lalmas, M.: INEX 2005 evaluation measures. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Kazai, G. (eds.) INEX 2005. LNCS, vol. 3977, pp. 16–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kazai, G., Lalmas, M., de Vries, A.P.: The overlap problem in content-oriented XML retrieval evaluation. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2004, Sheffield, England, July 2004, pp. 72–79 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lalmas, M., Rölleke, T.: Modelling vague content and structure querying in XML retrieval with a probabilistic object-relational framework. In: Christiansen, H., Hacid, M.-S., Andreasen, T., Larsen, H.L. (eds.) FQAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3055, pp. 432–445. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Mass, Y., Mandelbrod, M.: Component ranking and automatic query refinement for XML retrieval. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Szlávik, Z. (eds.) INEX 2004. LNCS, vol. 3493, pp. 73–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Mass, Y., Mandelbrod, M.: Experimenting various user models for xml retrieval. In: Pre-Proceedings of INEX 2005, Dagstuhl, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ogilvie, P., Callan, J.: Using language models for flat text queries in XML retrieval. In: Proceedings of INEX 2003 Workshop, Dagstuhl, Germany, December 2003, pp. 12–18 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rölleke, T., Lalmas, M., Kazai, G., Ruthven, I., Quicker, S.: The accessibility dimension for structured document retrieval. In: Crestani, F., Girolami, M., van Rijsbergen, C.J.K. (eds.) ECIR 2002. LNCS, vol. 2291, p. 284. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Sauvagnat, K., Boughanem, M., Chrisment, C.: Answering content-and-structure-based queries on XML documents using relevance propagation. In: Information Systems - Special Issue SPIRE 2004. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sauvagnat, K., Hlaoua, L., Boughanem, M.: XML retrieval: what about using contextual relevance?. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC) - IAR (Information Access and Retrieval) Dijon (April 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sigurbjörnsson, B., Kamps, J., de Rijke, M.: The university of Amsterdam at INEX 2005: Adhoc track. In: Pre-Proceedings of INEX 2005 workshop, Dagstuhl, Germany (November 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. W3C. XQuery and XPath full-text use cases. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), W3C working draft (February 2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sauvagnat, K., Boughanem, M., Chrisment, C. (2006). Why Using Structural Hints in XML Retrieval?. In: Larsen, H.L., Pasi, G., Ortiz-Arroyo, D., Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H. (eds) Flexible Query Answering Systems. FQAS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4027. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11766254_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11766254_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34638-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34639-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics