Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Using Channel Theory to Account for Graphical Meaning Generations

  • Conference paper
Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4045))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1989 Accesses

Abstract

Many graphical representation systems apparently support derivative meanings, namely, meaning relations not directly legitimized by the systems’ semantic conventions. Practitioners and researchers of graphical communication have long realized the functional importance of the generative nature of graphical meaning, yet no systematic attempts have been made to clarify the informational mechanism behind it. In this project, we develop a mathematical framework in which meaning derivation properties of graphical systems are explicitly modeled and accounted for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tufte, E.R.: The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pinker, S.: A theory of graph comprehension. In: Aritificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing, pp. 73–126. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hilsdale (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lohse, G.L.: A cognitive model for understanding graphical perception. Human-Computer Interaction 8, 353–388 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowe, R.K.: Diagram prediction and higher order structures in mental representation. Research in Science Education 24, 208–216 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guthrie, J.T., Weber, S., Kimmerly, N.: Searching documents: Cognitive processes and deficits in understanding graphs, tables, and illustrations. Contemporary Educational Psychology 18, 186–221 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilhooly, K.J., Wood, M., Kinnear, P.R., Green, C.: Skill in map reading and memory for maps. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A, 87–107 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kinnear, P.R., Wood, M.: Memory for topographic vontour maps. British Journal of Psychology 78, 395–402 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ratwani, R.M., Trafton, J.G., Boehm-Davis, D.A.: Thinking graphically: Extracting local and global information. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 958–963 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Petre, M., Green, T.R.: Requirements of graphical notations for professional users: Electronics cad systems as a case study. Le Travail humain 55, 47–70 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marks, J., Reiter, E.: Avoiding unwanted conversational implicatures in text and graphics. In: AAAI 1990: Proceedings of Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 450–455. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park/Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barwise, J., Seligman, J.: Information Flow: the Logic of Distributed Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shimojima, A. (2006). Using Channel Theory to Account for Graphical Meaning Generations. In: Barker-Plummer, D., Cox, R., Swoboda, N. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4045. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783183_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11783183_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35623-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35624-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics