Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Small Sweeping 2NFAs Are Not Closed Under Complement

  • Conference paper
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4051))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A two-way nondeterministic finite automaton is sweeping (snfa) if its input head can change direction only on the end-markers. For every n, we exhibit a language that can be recognized by an n-state snfa but requires \(2^{\varOmega(n)}\) states on every snfa recognizing its complement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seiferas, J.I.: Manuscript communicated to Michael Sipser (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sakoda, W.J., Sipser, M.: Nondeterminism and the size of two-way finite automata. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pp. 275–286 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kapoutsis, C.: Deterministic moles cannot solve liveness. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems, pp. 194–205 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sipser, M.: Halting space-bounded computations. Theoretical Computer Science 10, 335–338 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Geffert, V., Mereghetti, C., Pighizzini, G.: Complementing two-way finite automata. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Developments in Language Theory, pp. 260–271 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sipser, M.: Lower bounds on the size of sweeping automata. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 21(2), 195–202 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Berman, P.: A note on sweeping automata. In: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, pp. 91–97 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Micali, S.: Two-way deterministic finite automata are exponentially more succinct than sweeping automata. Information Processing Letters 12(2), 103–105 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kapoutsis, C.A. (2006). Small Sweeping 2NFAs Are Not Closed Under Complement. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4051. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11786986_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11786986_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35904-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35905-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics