Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

New Types of Inter-agent Dialogues

  • Conference paper
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4049))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Much work in the area of argumentation-based dialogues between agents has been based on the influential taxonomy of dialogue types developed by Walton and Krabbe. In this paper we re-examine the Walton and Krabbe framework, concentrating on the preconditions for different types of dialogue and analyzing them in a systematic way. Doing so identifies a number of new kinds of dialogue missing from the framework. We discuss some of the more interesting of these and develop protocols for them.

This paper is a modified version of E. Cogan, S. Parsons, and P. McBurney. What kind of argument are we going to have today? In F. Dignum, V. Dignum, S. Koenig, S. Kraus, M. P. Singh, and M. Wooldridge, editors, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 544-551. ACM Press, 2005.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amgoud, L.: Contribution a l’integration des préferences dans le raisonnement argumentatif. PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse (July 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–7 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In: Durfee, E. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 31–38. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Coenen, F.P., Orton, P.: Argument-based explanation of the British Nationality Act as a logic program. Computers, Law and AI 2(1), 53–66 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Huang, Z., der van Torre, L.: The BOID architecture: conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. In: Müller, J.P., Andre, E., Sen, S., Frasson, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Montreal, Canada, pp. 9–16. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dignum, F., Dunin-Kȩplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Agent theory for team formation by dialogue. In: Castelfranchi, C., Lespérance, Y. (eds.) Seventh Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Boston, USA, pp. 141–156 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321–357 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunne, P.E.: Prevarication in dispute protocols. In: Sartor, G. (ed.) Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on AI and Law (ICAIL 2003), pp. 12–21. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J.: More on non-cooperation in Dialogue Logic. Logic Journal of the IGPL 9(2), 321–339 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J.: Non-cooperation in Dialogue Logic. Synthese 127(1-2), 161–186 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Girle, R.: Commands in Dialogue Logic. In: Gabbay, D.M., Ohlbach, H.J. (eds.) FAPR 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1085, pp. 46–260. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon, T.F.: The Pleadings Game: An exercise in computational dialectics. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2, 239–292 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenwood, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Structuring dialogue between the People and their representatives. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2739, pp. 55–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamblin, C.L.: Fallacies. Methuen and Co. Ltd., London (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hulstijn, J.: Dialogue Models for Inquiry and Transaction. PhD thesis, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence 104(1–2), 1–69 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Representing epistemic uncertainty by means of dialectical argumentation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 32(1–4), 125–169 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Parsons, S., McBurney, P., Wooldridge, M.: The mechanics of some formal inter-agent dialogues. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2922, pp. 329–348. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8(3), 261–292 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues. In: 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: On the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues. In: 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: Properties and complexity of formal inter-agent dialogues. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 347–376 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Prakken, H.: Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. Synthese 127, 187–219 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Reed, C.: Dialogue frames in agent communications. In: Demazeau, Y. (ed.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 246–253. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sklar, E., Parsons, S.: Towards the application of argumentation-based dialogues for education. In: Sierra, C., Sonenberg, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sycara, K.: Argumentation: Planning other agents plans. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 517–523 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sycara, K.: Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory and Decision 28, 203–242 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Walton, D.N., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yuan, T., Moore, D., Grierson, A.: Educational human-computer debate: A computational dialectics approach. In: Carenini, G., Grasso, F., Reed, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deptartment of Computer and Information Science, Brooklyn College City University of New York, 2900 Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, 11210, USA

    Eva Cogan & Simon Parsons

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Chadwick Building Peach Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZF, UK

    Peter McBurney

Authors
  1. Eva Cogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon Parsons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter McBurney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer & Information Science Brooklyn College, City University of New York, 2900 Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, 11210, NY, USA

    Simon Parsons

  2. LAMSADE, Université Paris-Dauphine, 75775, Paris Cedex 16, France

    Nicolas Maudet

  3. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Paris Descartes University,, 45, rue des Saints-Pères, 75270, Paris Cedex 06, France

    Pavlos Moraitis

  4. Faculty of Informatics, British University in Dubai, P.O. Box 502216, Dubau, United Arab Emirates

    Iyad Rahwan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cogan, E., Parsons, S., McBurney, P. (2006). New Types of Inter-agent Dialogues. In: Parsons, S., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P., Rahwan, I. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4049. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36355-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36356-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation