Abstract
During agent negotiation, argumentation-based negotiation of agent has been widely studied for it can make agent who received the argument change its goals or preferences accordingly. Being the two main arguments, threat and reward can even make the negotiators reduce their behavior space to find a well compromise quickly in the end, which can make them accomplish their cooperation on the base of getting the most profit of each of them. This paper presents a type of formal models of threat and reward first, and then present a new way of how to calculate the negotiation strengths of them through simulated calculations based on the models to make the negotiators threatened or rewarded make a right choice and accomplish their cooperation well.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Raiffa, H.: The art and science of negotiation [M]. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)
Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C.: Persuasive negotiation for autonomous agents: A rhetorical approach. In: IJCAIWorkshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 9–18 (2003)
Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., Mcburney, P., Parsons, S.I., Sonenberg, L.: Argumentation-based negotiation. In: The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 18, pp. 343–375. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Huang, T.: Intelligence Decision Supporting System[ M ]. Electronics Industry Press, Beijing (2001)
Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 104 (1998)
Rahwan, I., Sonenberg, L., Dignum, F.: Towards interest-based negotiation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomas Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2003), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 773–780 (2003)
Amgoud, L., Maudet, N.: Strategical considerations for argumentative agents (preliminary report). In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2002): Special session on Argument, dialogue, decision, Toulouse, France, pp. 399–407 (2002)
Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8, 261–292 (1998)
Amgoud, L., Prad, H.: Formal handling of threats and rewards in a negotiation dialogue. In: Dignum, F., Wooldridge, M., Koenig, S., Kraus, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, AAMAS’2005, Utrecht, pp. 529–536. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Weinberger, Y.B., Rosenschein, J.S.: Passive Threats among Agents in State Oriented Domains. In: The Sixteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Valencia, Spain, pp. 89–93 (2004)
Agogino, A., Tumer, K.: Multi Agent Reward Analysis for Learning in Noisy Domains. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Utrecht, Netherlands (2005)
Ramchurn, S.D.: Multi-Agent Negotiation using Trust and Persuasion. PhD Thesis. Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, England (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wu, J., Jiang, G., Huang, T. (2006). Using Two Main Arguments in Agent Negotiation. In: Shi, ZZ., Sadananda, R. (eds) Agent Computing and Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4088. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11802372_62
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11802372_62
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36707-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36860-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)