Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Framework and Complexity Results for Coordinating Non-cooperative Planning Agents

  • Conference paper
Multiagent System Technologies (MATES 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4196))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In multi-agent planning problems agents are requested to jointly solve a complex task consisting of a set of interrelated tasks. Since none of the agents is capable to solve the whole task on its own, usually each of them is assigned to a subset of tasks. If agents are dependent upon each other via interrelated tasks they are assigned to, moderately coupled teams of agents are called for. Such teams solve the task by coordinating during or after planning and revising their plans if necessary. In this paper we show that such complex tasks also can be solved by loosely coupled teams of agents that are able to plan independently, although the computational complexity of the coordination problems involved is high. We also investigate some of the factors influencing this complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dias, M.B., Zlot, R.M., Kalra, N., Stentz, A.: Market-based multirobot coordination: A survey and analysis. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-05-13, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kalra, N., Stentz, A., Ferguson, D.: Hoplites: A market framework for complex tight coordination in multi-agent teams. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-04-41, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Decker, K.S., Lesser, V.R.: Designing a family of coordination algorithms. In: Proc. of DAI, pp. 65–84 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Durfee, E.H., Lesser, V.R.: Partial global planning: A coordination framework for distributed hypothesis formation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 21(5), 1167–1183 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ephrati, E., Rosenschein, J.S.: Multi-agent planning as the process of merging distributed sub-plans. In: Proc. of DAI, pp. 115–129 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cox, J.S., Durfee, E.H.: Discovering and exploiting synergy between hierarchical planning agents. In: Proc. of AAMAS, pp. 281–288 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foulser, D.E., Li, M., Yang, Q.: Theory and algorithms for plan merging. Artificial Intelligence Journal 57(2-3), 143–182 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. von Martial, F.: Coordinating Plans of Autonomous Agents. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moses, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: Artificial social systems. Computers and AI 14(6), 533–562 (1995)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Shoham, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: On social laws for artificial agent societies: Off-line design. Artificial Intelligence 73(1–2), 231–252 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jennings, N.R.: Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 8(3), 223–250 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zlot, R.M., Stentz, A.: Market-based multirobot coordination for complex tasks. International Journal of Robotics Research; Special Issue on the 4th International Conference on Field and Service Robotics 25(1), 73–101 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zlot, R.M., Stentz, A.: Market-based multirobot coordination using task abstraction. In: Proc. of FSR (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buzing, P., ter Mors, A.W., Valk, J.M., Witteveen, C.: Coordinating self-interested planning agents. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 12(2) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Valk, J.M.: Coordination among Autonomous Planners. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steenhuisen, J.R., Witteveen, C.: Complexity studies in coordinating non-cooperative planning agents. Technical report, Delft University of Technology, Forthcoming (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hunsberger, L.: Group Decision Making and Temporal Reasoning. PhD thesis, Harvard University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Steenhuisen, J.R., Witteveen, C., ter Mors, A.W., Valk, J.M. (2006). Framework and Complexity Results for Coordinating Non-cooperative Planning Agents. In: Fischer, K., Timm, I.J., André, E., Zhong, N. (eds) Multiagent System Technologies. MATES 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11872283_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11872283_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45376-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46057-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics