Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Comparing Fuzzy Naive Bayes and Gaussian Naive Bayes for Decision Making in RoboCup 3D

  • Conference paper
MICAI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (MICAI 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4293))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Learning and making decisions in a complex uncertain multiagent environment like RoboCup Soccer Simulation 3D is a non-trivial task. In this paper, a probabilistic approach to handle such uncertainty in RoboCup 3D is proposed, specifically a Naive Bayes classifier. Although its conditional independence assumption is not always accomplished, it has proved to be successful in a whole range of applications. Typically, the Naive Bayes model assumes discrete attributes, but in RoboCup 3D the attributes are continuous. In literature, Naive Bayes has been adapted to handle continuous attributes mainly using Gaussian distributions or discretizing the domain, both of which present certain disadvantages. In the former, the probability density of attributes is not always well-fitted by a normal distribution. In the latter, there can be loss of information. Instead of discretizing, the use of a Fuzzy Naive Bayes classifier is proposed in which attributes do not take a single value, but a set of values with a certain membership degree. Gaussian and Fuzzy Naive Bayes classifiers are implemented for the pass evaluation skill of 3D agents. The classifiers are trained with different number of training examples and different number of attributes. Each generated classifier is tested in a scenario with three teammates and four opponents. Additionally, Gaussian and Fuzzy approaches are compared versus a random pass selector. Finally, it is shown that the Fuzzy Naive Bayes approach offers very promising results in the RoboCup 3D domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 239.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langley, P., Iba, W., Thompson, K.: An Analysis of Bayesian Classifiers. In: Proc. 10th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 223–228. AAAI Press and MIT Press, USA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis, D.: Naive Bayes at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 4–15 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rish, I.: An empirical study of the naive bayes classifier. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2001 workshop on Empirical Methods in AI, pp. 41–46 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman, N., Goldszmidt, M.: Discretization of continuous attributes while learning Bayesian networks. In: Saitta, L. (ed.) Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 157–165 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Störr, H.-P.: A compact fuzzy extension of the Naive Bayesian classification algorithm. In: Proceedings InTech/VJFuzzy, pp. 172–177 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zadrozny, B., Elkan, E.: Obtaining calibrated probability estimates from decision trees and naive Bayesian classifiers. In: Proceedings of 18th International Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 609–616 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Stone, P., Veloso, M.: Layered Learning. In: Lopez de Mantaras, R., Plaza, E. (eds.) ECML 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1810, pp. 369–381. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bustamante, C., Garrido, L., Soto, R.: Fuzzy Naive Bayesian Classification in RoboSoccer 3D: A hybrid approach to decision making. In: Proceedings of RoboCup International Symposium (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buck, S., Riedmiller, M.: Learning Situation Dependent Success Rates Of Actions. In: A RoboCup Scenario. Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, p. 809 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stone, P.: Layered Learning in Multiagent Systems: A Winning Approach to Robotic Soccer. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bustamante, C., Garrido, L., Soto, R. (2006). Comparing Fuzzy Naive Bayes and Gaussian Naive Bayes for Decision Making in RoboCup 3D. In: Gelbukh, A., Reyes-Garcia, C.A. (eds) MICAI 2006: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. MICAI 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4293. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11925231_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11925231_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-49026-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49058-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics