Abstract
Many popular search engines run an auction to determine the placement of advertisements next to search results. Current auctions at Google and Yahoo! let advertisers specify a single amount as their bid in the auction. This bid is interpreted as the maximum amount the advertiser is willing to pay per click on its ad. When search queries arrive, the bids are used to rank the ads linearly on the search result page. Advertisers seek to be high on the list, as this attracts more attention and more clicks. The advertisers pay for each user who clicks on their ad, and the amount charged depends on the bids of all the advertisers participating in the auction.
We study the problem of ranking ads and associated pricing mechanisms when the advertisers not only specify a bid, but additionally express their preference for positions in the list of ads. In particular, we study prefix position auctions where advertiser i can specify that she is interested only in the top κ i positions.
We present a simple allocation and pricing mechanism that generalizes the desirable properties of current auctions that do not have position constraints. In addition, we show that our auction has an envy-free [1] or symmetric [2] Nash equilibrium with the same outcome in allocation and pricing as the well-known truthful Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) auction. Furthermore, we show that this equilibrium is the best such equilibrium for the advertisers in terms of the profit made by each advertiser. We also discuss other position-based auctions.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., Schwarz, M.: Internet advertising and the generalized second price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. In: Second Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions (2006)
Varian, H.: Position auctions (2006) Working Paper, available at http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~Papers/2006/position.pdf
Aggarwal, G.: Privacy Protection and Advertising in a Networked World. PhD thesis, Stanford University (2005)
Aggarwal, G., Goel, A., Motwani, R.: Truthful auctions for pricing search keywords. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC 2006 (2006)
Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance 16, 8–37 (1961)
Clarke, E.: Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11, 17–33 (1971)
Groves, T.: Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41, 617–631 (1973)
Nielsen//NetRatings: Interactive advertising bureau (IAB) search branding study (2004), Commissioned by the IAB Search Engine Committee, Available at http://www.iab.net/resources/iab_searchbrand.asp
Mas-Collel, A., Whinston, M., Green, J.: Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aggarwal, G., Feldman, J., Muthukrishnan, S. (2007). Bidding to the Top: VCG and Equilibria of Position-Based Auctions. In: Erlebach, T., Kaklamanis, C. (eds) Approximation and Online Algorithms. WAOA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4368. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11970125_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11970125_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69513-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69514-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)