Abstract
In many group-living primates, males are dominant over females, but despite this dominance, they allow females access to resources during the period when females are sexually attractive - but only then and not otherwise. Conventionally, such male ‘courtesy’ is explained as a special strategy to gain mating access to females. In the present paper I propose a simpler hypothesis that is based on an agentcentered model, namely that male ‘courtesy’ to females is in fact a kind of ‘timidity’ that arises because sexual attraction automatically increases female dominance. The model consists in a homogeneous, virtual world with agents that group and perform dominance interactions. VirtualMales have a higher intensity of aggression and start with a greater capacity to win conflicts than VirtualFemales. I shall explain how the addition of attraction of VirtualMales by VirtualFemales leads to female dominance, and other phenomena that are relevant to the study of animal behaviour.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Trivers, R.L., Parental investment and sexual selection, in Sexual selection and the descent of man, B. Campbell, Editor. 1972, Aldine: Chicago. p. 136–179.
Magurran, A. and M. Nowak, Another battle of the sexes. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, 1991. 246: p. 31–38.
Hill, D., Social relationships between adult male and female rhesus macaques: 1. Sexual consortships. Primates, 1987. 28: p. 439–456.
Yerkes, R.M., Social dominance and sexual status in chimpanzees. Quarterly Review of Biology, 1939. 14: p. 115–136.
Yerkes, R.M., Social behavior of chimpanzees: dominance between mates in relation to sexual status. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1940. 30: p. 147–186.
Goodall, J., The chimpanzees of Gombe: patterns of behaviour. 1986, Cambridge MA and London: Belknapp Press of Harvard University Press.
de Waal, F.B.M., Foodsharing and reciprocal obligations among chimpanzees. J. Human Evolution, 1989. 18: p. 433–459.
Hemelrijk, C.K., C.M. Meier, and R.D. Martin, ‘Friendship’ for fitness in chimpanzees? Animal Behaviour, 1999. 58: p. 1223–1229.
Gould, S.J. and R.C. Lewontin, The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptionist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 1979. 205: p. 581–598.
Hemelrijk, C.K., Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure. Animal Behaviour, 2000, 59, 1035–1048.
Hemelrijk, C.K., Reciprocation in apes: from complex cognition to selfstructuring., in Great Ape Societies, W.C. McGrew, L.F. Marchant, and T. Nishida, Editors. 1996, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p. 185–195.
Hemelrijk, C.K., Spatial centrality of dominants without positional preference, in Artificial Life VI, C. Adami, et al., Editors. 1998, MIT-Press: Los Angeles, USA. p. 307–315.
Hemelrijk, C. Risk Sensitive and Ambiguity Reducing Dominance Interactions in a Virtual Laboratory. in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation on Adaptive Behavior. From Animals to Animats 5. 1998. Zürich: MIT Press.
Hemelrijk, C.K., Dominance interactions, spatial dynamics and emergent reciprocity in a virtual world, in Proceedings of the fourth international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior, P. Maes, et al., Editors. 1996, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. p. 545–552.
Hemelrijk, C.K., Cooperation without genes, games or cognition., in 4th European Conference on Artificial Life, P. Husbands and I. Harvey, Editors. 1997, MIT-Press: Cambridge MA. p. 511–520.
Hogeweg, P., MIRROR beyond MIRROR, Puddles of LIFE, in Artificial life, SFI studies in the sciences of complexity, C. Langton, Editor. 1988, Adisson-Wesley Publishing Company: Redwood City, California. p. 297–316.
Bonabeau, E., G. Theraulaz, and J.-L. Deneubourg, Mathematical models of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 1996. 58(4): p. 661–717.
Hemelrijk, C.K., Effects of cohesiveness on intersexual dominance relationships and spatial structure among group-living virtual entities, in Advances in Artificial Life. Fifth European Conference on Artificial Life, D. Floreano, Nicoud, J-D., Mondada, F., Editor. 1999, Springer Verlag: Berlin. p. 524–534.
Hemelrijk, C.K., An individual-oriented model on the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences., 1999. 266: p. 361–369.
Hemelrijk, C.K., Self-reinforcing dominance interactions between virtual males and females. Hypothesis generation for primate studies. Adaptive Behavior, in press.
Bernstein, I.S. and C.L. Ehardt, Intragroup agonistic behavior in Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). International Journal of Primatology, 1985. 6(3): p. 209–226.
Judson, O.P., The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1994. 9: p. 9–14.
Schaik, C.P.v., Why are diurnal primates living in groups? Behaviour, 1983. 87: p. 120–144.
Hogeweg, P. and B. Hesper, The ontogeny of interaction structure in bumble bee colonies: a MIRROR model. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1983. 12: p. 271–283.
Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf, Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 2 ed. 1981,San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Siegel, S. and N.J. Castellan, Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. second ed. Statistics Series. 1988, New York: McGraw-Hill international editions. 399.
Mardia, K.V., Statistics of directional data. 1972, London: Academic Press. 180 Charlotte K. Hemelrijk
Honk, C.v. and P. Hogeweg, The ontogeny of the social structure in a captive Bombus terestris colony. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1981. 9: p. 111–119.
Michael, R.P. and D. Zumpe, Aggression and gonadal hormones in captive rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Behaviour, 1970. 18: p. 1–10.
Odendaal, F.J., P. Turchin, and F.R. Stermitz, An incidental-effect hypothesis explaining aggregation of males in a population of Euphydryas anicia. The American Naturalist, 1988. 132(5): p. 735–749.
Ray, T.S., An approach to the synthesis of life., in Artficial Life II, Santa Fe Institute, Studies in the sciences of compexity, C.G. Langton, et al., Editors. 1991, Addison-Wesley, CA: Redwood City. p. 371–408.
Hemelrijk, C. K. 1997 Cooperation without genes, games or cognition. In 4th European Conference on Artificial Life (ed. P. Husbands & I. Harvey), pp. 511–520. Cambridge MA: MIT-Press.
Huberman, B.A. and N.S. Glance, Evolutionary games and computer simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United tates of America, 1993. 90: p. 7716–7718.
Goss, S. and J.L. Deneubourg, Autocatalysis as a source of synchronised rhythmical activity in social insects. Insectes Sociaux, 1988. 35(3): p. 310–315.
Hogeweg, P. and B. Hesper, A model study on biomorphological description. Pattern Recognition, 1974. 6: p. 165–179.
Galef, B.G.J., Imitation in animals: history, definitions, and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory., in Social learning: Psychobiological and biological perspectives, T. Zentall and B. Galef, Editors. 1988, Erlbaum: Hillsdale, New Jersey. p. 3–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hemelrijk, C.K. (2000). Sexual Attraction and Inter-sexual Dominance among Virtual Agents. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation. MABS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1979. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44561-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44561-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41522-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44561-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive