Abstract
Automated negotiation is gaining interest, but issues relating to the construction of negotiating agent architectures have not been addressed sufficiently. Towards this end, we present a novel agent construction model that enables the development of a range of agent architectures based on a common set of building blocks. In this paper we identify the fundamental components needed for two generic classes of negotiating agents: simple negotiators and argumentative negotiators, and use our model to describe them. We demonstrate how the model allows us to reuse fundamental components across these negotiation architectures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. Bartolini, C. Preist, and N.R. Jennings. Architecting for reuse: A software framework for automated negotiation. In Proc. of AOSE-02, pages 87–98, 2002.
M. d’Inverno and M. Luck. Engineering AgentSpeak(L): A Formal Computational Model. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):233–260, 1998.
M. d’Inverno and M. Luck. Understanding Agent Systems. Springer-Verlag, 2001.
P. Faratin. Automated Service Negotiation Between Autonomous Computational Agents. PhD thesis, UCL, Queen Mary and Westfield, Dept. of Electronic Engineering, 2000.
S. Fatima, M. Wooldridge, and N. R. Jennings. Multi-issue negotiation under time constraints. In C. Castelfranchi and L. Johnson, editors, Proc. of AAMAS-02, pages 143–150. ACM Press, 2002.
N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, A. R. Lomuscio, S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and M. Wooldridge. Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. Int. Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(2):199–215, 2001.
N.R. Jennings, S. Parsons, P. Noriega, and C. Sierra. On argumentation-based negotiation. In Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 1–7, Boston, USA, 1998.
S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and N. Jennings. Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):261–292, 1998.
H. Prakken and G. Vreeswijk. Logics for defeasible argumentation. In D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, volume 4, pages 219–318. Kluwer, 2nd edition, 2002.
I. Rahwan, L. Sonenberg, and F. Dignum. Towards interest-based negotiation. In Proc. of AAMAS-03 (to appear), Melbourne, Australia, 2003.
C. Sierra, N.R. Jennings, P. Noriega, and S. Parsons. A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In M. Singh, A. Rao, and M. Wooldridge, editors, Intelligent Agent IV: Proc. of ATAL 1997, volume 1365 of LNCS, pages 177–192. Springer, 1998.
TAC. The Trading Agent Competition. World Wide Web, http://www.sics.se/tac/, 2003.
D.N. Walton and E.C.W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, Albany, NY, USA, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ashri, R., Rahwan, I., Luck, M. (2003). Architectures for Negotiating Agents. In: Mařík, V., Pěchouček, M., Müller, J. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Applications III. CEEMAS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2691. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45023-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45023-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40450-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45023-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive