Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Calculation vs. Subjective Assessment with Respect to Fuzzy Probability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Intelligence. Theory and Applications (Fuzzy Days 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2206))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

When a sample is drawn from a population with infinite elements, it is impossible to precisely get the probability distribution of the population from the sample. Particularly, when the size of the sample is small, the estimated values of the probabilities must be so imprecise that they would be represented by some fuzzy numbers. In that case, we can use the interior-outer-set model to calculate a fuzzy probability distribution, or invite some experts to review the sample and to subjectively assess. In this paper, with simulation experiments and inquiring experts, we prove that,the results from the calculation and the subjective assessment are very near in terms of the fuzzy expected value and the standard deviation. It implies that the interior-outer-set model can replace experts to give fuzzy probabilities.

Project supported by a Mercator Visiting Professorship of the German Research Society DFG,granted to Prof. Chongfu Huang at the University of Dortmund.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooman, G. de: Possibilistic second-order probability models. Advances in Cybernetic Modelling of Complex Systems (Part 5 of Proceedings of InterSymp’ 97, Baden-Baden, Germany, August 18–23, 1997), ed. G.E. Lasker, 6–10

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooman, G. de: Lower desirability functions: a convenient imprecise hierarchical uncertainty model. Proc. 1st International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications, eds. G. de Cooman, F.G. Cozman, S. Moral and P. Walley, Ghent, Belgium, 30 June–2 July 1999, 111–120

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Fuzzy sets, probability, and Measurement. European J. Operns. Res. 40 (1989) 135–154

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeling, A.N.S.: Fuzzy sets and decision analysis. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man & Cyb. SMC-10 (1980) 341–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, C.F.: Fuzzy risk assessment of urban natural hazards. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 83 (1996) 271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, C.F.: Principle of information diffusion. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 91 (1997) 69–90

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, C.F.: Concepts and methods of fuzzy risk analysis. Risk Research and Management in Asian Perspective (Proceedings of the First China-Japan Conference on Risk Assessment and Management, November 23–26, 1998, Beijing, International Academic Publishers) 12–23

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, C.F.: An application of calculated fuzzy risk. Information Science (in press, accepted in 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, C.F.: Reliability of fuzzy risk assessment by information distribution. Proc. 19th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, Atlanta, on July 1–15, 2000, 278–282

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, C.F., Bai, H.L.: Calculation fuzzy risk with incomplete data. Proc. 4th International FLINS Conference on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing in Nuclear Science and Engineering, Bruges, Belgium, August 28–30, 2000, 180–187

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, C.F., Moraga, C.: Interior-outer-set model for fuzzy risk assessment and its matrix algorithm. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems (submitted in 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, C.F., Shi, P.J.: Fuzzy risk and calculation. Proc. 18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, New York, June 10–12, 1999, 90–94

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, Z.R., Huang, C.F.: Information distribution method relevant in fuzzy information analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 36 (1990) 67–76

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, P.Z.: Fuzzy Sets and Falling Shadows of Random Sets. Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing, 1985, (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Watson, S.R., Weiss, J.J. and Donnell, M.L.: Fuzzy decision analysis. IEEE Trans Sys. Man & Cyb. SMC-9 (1979) 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh, L.A.: Probability measures of fuzzy events. Journal of Mathematics Analysis and Applications 23 (1968) 421–427

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huang, C., Moraga, C., Yuan, X. (2001). Calculation vs. Subjective Assessment with Respect to Fuzzy Probability. In: Reusch, B. (eds) Computational Intelligence. Theory and Applications. Fuzzy Days 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2206. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45493-4_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45493-4_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42732-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45493-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics