Abstract
A Bayesian Network is a construct that is used to model a given joint probability distribution. In order to assess the quality of an inference, or to choose between competing networks modelling the same data, we need methods to estimate the accuracy of a Bayesian network. Although the accuracy of a Bayesian network can be easily defined in theory, it is rarely possible to compute it in practice for real-world applications due to the size of the space representing the variables. Instead, alternative characteristics of a Bayesian network, which relate to and reflect the accuracy, are used. A popular formalism that adopts such methods is the Minimum Description Length (MDL). It models the accuracy of a Bayesian network as the probability of the Bayesian network given the data set that it models. However in the context of Bayesian Networks, the MDL formalism is flawed, exhibiting several shortcomings. In its place, we propose a new framework for Bayesian Networks. We specify a measure, which models the accuracy of a Bayesian network as the accuracy of the conditional independencies implied by its structure. Experiments have been conducted, using real-world data sets, to compare MDL and the new measure. The experimental results demonstrate that the new measure is much better correlated to the actual accuracy than the MDL measure. These results support the theoretical claims, and confirm the significance of the proposed framework.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike H. “A new look at the statistical identification model”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19:716–723, 1974
Chow C.K., Liu C.N. “Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 14:462–467, 1968
Friedman N., Yakhini Z. “On the sample complexity of learning Bayesian networks” Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1996
Friedman N., Geiger D., Goldszmidt M. “Bayesian network classifiers” Machine Learning, 1997
Jensen F.V. “An introduction to Bayesian networks” UCL Press, 1996
Kim J., Gillies D.F. “Automatic Morphometric Analysis of Neural Cells” Machine Graphics and Vision 7(4), 1998
Kwoh C.K., Gillies D.F. “Using Hidden Nodes in Bayesian Networks” Artificial Intelligence 88:1–38, 1996
Neapolitan R.E. “Probabilistic reasoning in expert systems: theory and algorithms” Wiley-Interscience, 1990
Pappas A., Gillies D. “The Accuracy of a Bayesian Network” Technical Report, Imperial College, 2002 (http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk)
Pearl J. “Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference” Morgan Kaufmann, 1988 (4th printing, 1997)
Rissanen J. “Modelling by shortest data description” Automatica, 14:465–471, 1978
Russell S., Norvig P. “Artificial Intelligence: a modern approach” Prentice Hall International, 1995
Sucar L.E., Gillies D.F., Gillies D.A. “Uncertainty Management in Expert Systems” Artificial Intelligence 61:187–208, 1993
Schwarz G. “Estimate the dimension of a model” The Annals of Statistics, 6(2):461–464, 1978
Tahseen T. “A new approach to learning Bayesian network classifiers” Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College, 1998
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pappas, A., Gillies, D.F. (2002). A New Measure for the Accuracy of a Bayesian Network. In: Coello Coello, C.A., de Albornoz, A., Sucar, L.E., Battistutti, O.C. (eds) MICAI 2002: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. MICAI 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2313. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46016-0_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46016-0_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43475-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46016-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive