Abstract
Cognitive categories in the geographic realm manifest certain special features as contrasted with categories for objects at surveyable scales. We argue that these features reflect specific ontological characteristics of geographic objects. This paper presents hypotheses as to the nature of the features mentioned, reviews previous empirical work on geographic categories, and presents the results of pilot experiments that used English-speaking subjects to test our hypotheses. Our experiments show geographic categories to be similar to their non-geographic counterparts in the ways in which they generate instances of different relative frequencies at different levels. Other tests, however, provide preliminary evidence for the existence of important differences in subjects’ categorizations of geographic and non-geographic objects, and suggest further experimental work especially with regard to the role in cognitive categorization of different types of object-boundaries at different scales.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
reference
Abbott, V. Black, J. H. and Smith, E. E. 1985, “The Representation of Scripts in Memory,” Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 179–199.
Battig, W. F., and Montague, W. E., 1968, “Category Norms for Verbal Items in 56 Categories: A Replication and Extension of the Connecticut Norms,” Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80, No. 3, Part 2, pp. 1–46.
Berlin, B. 1978, “Ethnobiological Classification,” in: E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 9–26.
Bloom, P. 1998, “Theories of artifact categories,” Cognition, 66, 87–93.
Peuquet, D., Smith, B., and Brogaard, B., 1999, Objects and Fields. Report on the Specialist Meeting of Varenius Research Initiative, Buffalo/Santa Barbara/Maine: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.
Burrough, Peter A. and Frank, Andrew U. (eds.) 1996, Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, London and Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.
Cantor, N. and Mischel, W. 1979, “Prototypes in Person Perception,” in: L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 12, New York: Academic Press.
Casati, R., and Varzi, A. C. 1994, Holes and Other Superficialities, Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press (Bradford Books).
Casati, R., and Varzi, A. C. 1996, “The Structure of Spatial Location,”, Philosophical Studies 82, 205–239.
Casati, R., Smith, B., and Varzi, A. 1998, “Ontological Tools for Geographic Representation.” in: Guarino (ed.), 77–85.
Egenhofer, M. J., and Mark, D. M. 1995, “Modeling Conceptual Neighborhoods of Topological Relations,” International Journal of GIS, 9, No. 5, pp. 555–565.
Egenhofer, M. J., and Mark, D. M., 1995a, “Naive Geography,” in Frank and Kuhn (eds.), 1–15.
Ekman, P. 1992, “Facial Expression and Emotion,” American Psychologist, 48.
Fegeas, R. G., Cascio, J. L., and Lazar, R. A. 1992, “An Overview of FIPS 173, the Spatial Data Transfer Standard,” Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 19(5), 278–293.
Frank, A. U. and Kuhn, W. (eds.) 1995, Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences No. 988.
Gelman, S. A. and Wellman, H. M 1991, “Insides and Essences: Early Understandings of the Non-Obvious,” Cognition, 38, 213–244.
Gunalik, I. B. and Friend, J. H. (eds.) 1966, Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language, College Edition, Cleveland and New York: The World Publishing Company.
Hayes, P. 1985, “The Second Naive Physics Manifesto,” in: Hobbs and Moore (eds.), 1–36.
Hayes, P., 1985, “Naive Physics I: Ontology of Liquids,” in: Hobbs and Moore (eds.), 71–108.
Hobbs, J. and Moore, R. (eds.), Formal Theories of the Commonsense World, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Izard, C. E. 1992 “Basic Emotions, Relations among Emotions, and Emotion-Cognition Relations,” Psychological Review, 99, 561–565.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Oatley, K. 1992, “Basic Emotions, Rationality, and Folk Theory,” Cognition and Emotion, 6, 201–223.
Keil, F. C. and Batterman, N. 1984, “A Characteristic-to-Defining Shift in the Development of Word Meaning,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 221–236.
Lloyd, R., Patton, D., and Cammack, R. 1996, “Basic-level geographic categories,” Professional Geographer. 48: 181–194.
Lopez, A., Atran, S., Coley, J. D., Medin, D. L, and Smith, E. E. 1997, “The tree of life: Universal and cultural features of folkbiological taxonomies and inductions,” Cognitive Psychology 32, 251–295.
Malt, B. C. 1994, “Category Coherence in Cross-Cultural Perspective,” Cognitive Psychology, 29, 85–148.
Malt, B. C. and Johnson, E. C. 1992, “Do Artifact Concepts have Cores?” Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 195–217.
Malt, B. C. and Johnson, E. C. 1998, “Artifact Category Membership and the Intentional-Historical Theory,” Cognition, 66, 79–85.
Mark, D. M. 1993, “A Theoretical Framework for Extending the Set of Geographic Entity Types in the U.S. Spatial Data Transfer Standard (SDTS),” Proceedings, GIS/LIS’93, Minneapolis, November 1993, 2, pp. 475–483.
Mark, D. M. 1993a, “Water is not H2O,” Cognitive Psychology, 27, 41–70.
Malt, B. C. 1995, “Toward a Theoretical Framework for Geographic Entity Types,” in: Frank, A. U., and Campari, I (eds.), Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences No. 716, pp. 270–283.
Mark, D. M., and Egenhofer, M. J. 1994, “Calibrating the Meanings of Spatial Predicates From Natural Language: Line-region Relations,” Proceedings, Spatial Data Handling 1994, 1, 538–553.
Mark, D. M., and Egenhofer, M. J. 1994a, “Modeling Spatial Relations Between Lines and Regions: Combining Formal Mathematical Models and HumanSubjects Testing,” Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 21(4), 195–212.
Mark, D. M., and Egenhofer, M. J. 1995, “Topology of Prototypical Spatial Relations Between Lines and Regions in English and Spanish,” Proceedings, Auto Carto 12, Charlotte, North Carolina, March 1995, 245–254.
Mayhew, S., 1997, A Dictionary of Geography. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Miller, G. A. and Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1976, Language and perception, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Moore, W. G., 1978, A Dictionary of Geography: Definitions and Explanations of Terms Used in Physical Geography. New York: Barnes and Noble Books (2ndEdition).
Morris, M. W. and Murphy, G. L. 1990, “Converging Operations on a Basic Level in Event Taxonomies,” Memory and Cognition, 18, 407–418.
Plutchik, R., 1993, “Emotions and Their Vicissitudes: Emotions and Psychopathology,” in: M. Lewis and J. M. Haviland (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, New York: Guilford, 53–65.
Quine, W. V. O., 1953, “On What There Is,” From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rifkin, A., 1985, “Evidence for a Basic Level in Event Taxonomies,” Memory and Cognition, 13, 538–556.
Rosch, E., 1973, “On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories,” in: T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, New York, Academic Press.
Rosch, E., 1975, “The Nature of Mental Codes for Color Categories,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 303–322.
Rosch, E., 1978, “Principles of categorization”, in: E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (eds.) Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rugg, R., and Schmidt, W., 1986, “Testing the interim proposed standard for cartographic features,” in: H. Moellering, (ed). Issues in Digital Cartographic Data Standards: Report #7, Digital Cartographic Data Standards: A Report onEvaluation and Empirical Testing. Columbus, Ohio: National Committee forDigital Cartographic Data Standards.
Smith, B., 1995, “On Drawing Lines on a Map,” In Andrew U. Frank and Werner Kuhn (eds.), Spatial Information Theory. A Theoretical basis for GIS. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, etc.: Springer (1995): 475–484.
Smith, B., 1996, “Mereotopology: A Theory of Parts and Boundaries,” Data and Knowledge Engineering, 20, 287–303.
Smith, B., and Mark, D. M., 1998, “Ontology and Geographic Kinds,” Proceedings, Eighth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, 308–320: http://www.geog.buffalo.edu/ncgia/i21/SDH98.html.
Smith, B. and Mark, D. M. 1999, “Ontology with Human Subjects Testing: An Empirical Investigation of Geographic Categories,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology in press.
Smith, B., and Varzi, A., 1997, “Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries: An Essay on the Foundations of Geography,” in S. C. Hirtle and A. U. Frank (eds.), Spatial Information Theory. International Conference COSIT’ 97. Laurel Highlands,Pennsylvania, October 1997 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1329), Berlin/New York: Springer Verlag, 103–119. Revised version forthcoming as “Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. http://wings.buffalo.edu/philosophy/faculty/smith/articles/fiat.pdf.
Smith, B., and Varzi, A., (in press) “The Niche,” Noûs, http://wings.buffalo.edu/philosophy/faculty/smith/articles/niches.html.
Tversky, B. 1990, “Where partonomies and taxonomies meet,” in: S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies on Linguistic Categorization, London: Routledge, 334–344.
Tversky, B. and Hemenway, K. 1983, “Categories of Environmental Scenes,” Cognitive Psychology, 15, 121–149.
Tversky, B. and Hemenway, K. 1984, “Objects, Parts and Categories,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113:169–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mark, D.M., Smith, B., Tversky, B. (1999). Ontology and Geographic Objects: An Empirical Study of Cognitive Categorization. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science. COSIT 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1661. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66365-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48384-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive