Abstract
The allocation of office space in any large institution is usually a problematical issue, which often demands a substantial amount of time to perform manually. The result of this allocation affects the lives of whoever makes use of the space. In the higher education sector in the UK, space is becoming an increasingly precious commodity. Student numbers have risen significantly over the last few years and as a result, university departments have grown in size. In addition, universities have come under increasing financial pressure to ensure that space is utilized as efficiently and effectively as possible. However, space utilization is only one issue to take into account when measuring whether or not a particular allocation is of a sufficient high quality. The problem of space allocation is further complicated by the fact that no standard procedure is practiced throughout the higher education sector. Most institutions have their own standards and requirements, which are often very different to other institutions. Different levels of authority control the domains of rooms and resources in different institutions. The most common situation is where a central university office controls a number of faculties, each managing a number of departments. This paper will focus specifically on applying optimization methods to departmental room allocation for non-residential space in the higher education sector. It will look at the use of three methods (hill-climbing, simulated annealing and genetic algorithms) to automatically generate solutions to the problem. The processing power of computers and the repetitive search nature of this problem means that there is great potential for the automation of this process. The paper will conclude by discussing and comparing these methods and showing how they cope with a highly constrained problem.
The author’s names are listed in alphabetical order
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
I Giannikos, E El-Darzi and P Lees, An Integer Goal Programming Model to Allocate Offices to Staff in an Academic Institution in the Journal of the Operational Research Society Vol. 46No. 6. 713–720.
L Rizman, J Bradford and R Jacobs, A Multiple Objective Approach to Space Planning for Academic Facilities in the Journal of Management Science, Vol 25. 895–906.
C Benjamin, I Ehie and Y Omurtag, Planning Facilities at the University of Missouri-Rolia. Journal of Interfaces, Vol. 22No. 4. 95–105.
EK Burke and DB Varley. An Analysis of Space Allocation in British Universities, in Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling It, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1048, Springer-Verlag 1998. Pg 20–33
KB Yoon. A Constraint Model of Space Planning. Topics in Engineering Vol. 9, Computation Mechanics Publications, Southampton, UK.
F Glover, C McMillan and B Novick, Interactive Decision Software and Computer Graphics for Architectural and Space Planning, Annals of Operations Research 5, Scientific Publishing Company, 1985.
E Rich and K Knight, Artificial Intelligence, international Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, Ine, 1991. Pg. 71.
S Martello, P Toth. Knapsack Problems.. Algorithms and Computer Implementations. Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization. Pg. 50–52
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Burke, E.K., Varley, D.B. (1999). Automating Space Allocation in Higher Education. In: McKay, B., Yao, X., Newton, C.S., Kim, JH., Furuhashi, T. (eds) Simulated Evolution and Learning. SEAL 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1585. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48873-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48873-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65907-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48873-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive