Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Abstract

This study concentrates on self-regulation within distance learning. It is based on qualitative approach. The point of view is on higher education in Finland. As a result was found that self-regulation is a complex issue in all learning processes but especially in distance learning. Supervision has a strong influence on self-regulation within distance learning. However, some kind of social contacts are needed with other students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. P. Kawachi. “Initiating intrinsic motivation in online education: review of the current state of the art.” Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 11 No.1, 2003, pp.59-81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M.G. Moore and G. Kearsley. Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA. Wadsworth. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Romano, T.L. Wallace, I.J. Helmick, L.M. Carey and L. Adkins. “Study procrastination, achievement, and academic motivation in web-based and blended distance learning.” Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 8., 2005, pp. 299-305

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Carr. “As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students: colleges are using online courses to raise enrollment, but retaining is another matter.” Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 46 No.23, 2000, pp. 39-41

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. McVay-Lynch. The Online Educator: A Guide to Creating the Virtual Classroom, Taylor & Francis, London. 2002

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.P. Rovai. “Development of an instrument to measure classroom community.” Internet & Higher Education, Vol. 5 No.3, 2002, pp.197-211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A.P. Rovai. “A constructivist approach to online college learning”. Internet & Higher Education, Vol. 7 No.2, 2004, pp.79-93

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Sharp. “Study support and the development of the self-regulated learner.” Educational Research, Vol. 44 No.1, 2002, pp.29-41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Scardamalia and C. Bereiter. “Computer support for knowledge-building communities.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 3 No.3, 1994, pp.265-285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R.M. Palloff and K. Pratt. The Virtual Student: A Profile and Guide to Working with Online Learners, Jossey-Bass, San Franscico, CA. 2003

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Steffe and P. Gale. (eds.). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum. 1995

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Pintrich. “The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self -regulated learning.” International Journal of Educational Research.,Vol 31, 1999, pp. 459-470

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Wolters. “Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation.” Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 90 Iss. 2, 1998, pp. 224-235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Wolters. “Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective.” Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 95 No.1, 2003, pp.179-187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M.D. Roblyer. “ Is choice important in distance learning? A study of student motives for taking internet-based courses at the high school and community college levels.” Journal of Research on Computing in Education, Vol. 32 No.1, 1999, pp.157-171

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.P. Rovai. “Building classroom community at a distance: a case study.” Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 49 No.4, 2001, pp.33-48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A.P. Rovai. “Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks.” Internet & Higher Education, Vol. 5 No.4, 2002, pp.319-332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A.P. Rovai. “Strategies for grading online discussion: effects on discussions and classroom community in internet-based university courses.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, Vol. 15 No.1, 2003, pp.89-107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H.O. Nourse, S.E. Roulac and S. Lundstrom. “Linking Real Estate Decisions to Corporate Strategy.” Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 8 No. 4, 1993 pp. 475-494.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Bandura. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 1986

    Google Scholar 

  21. B.J. Zimmerman. “Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective.” In: M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation. San Diego: Academic Press. 2000

    Google Scholar 

  22. “Adult learners: characteristics, theories, motivations, learning environment.” 2003, available at: www.dit.ie/DIT/lifelong/adult/adlearn_chars.pdf (accessed August 20, 2007)

  23. P.R. Pintrich and D.H. Schunk. Motivation in Education: Theory, research, and application. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  24. A.Y. Wang and M.H. Newlin. “Predictors of Web-Student Performance: the role of self- efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class.” Computers in Human Behavior. Vol 18 No. 2, 2002, pp. 151-163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Joo, M. Bong and H. Choi. “Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction.” Educational Technology Research and Development. Vol. 48 Iss 2, 2000, pp. 5-17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Zhang, F. Li, C. Duan and G. Wu. “Research on self-efficacy of distance learning and its influence to learners’ attainments.”2001. Retrieved August 18, 2007, from http://www.icce2001.org/cd/pdf/p13/CN100.pdf 27] R.P. Weber. Basic content analysis. Sage Publications, California, 2nd edition. 1990

  27. R.P. Weber. Basic content analysis. Sage Publications, California, 2nd edition. 1990

    Google Scholar 

  28. I. Dey. Qualitative data analysis. User-friendly guide for social scientists. Routlege, London. 1993

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. Krippendorf. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2004

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. Sullivan. “Gender differences and the online classroom: male and female college students evaluate their experiences.” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, Vol. 25, 2001, pp.805-818

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Skogster, P. (2008). Learning Property Management- Self-Regulation in Distance Learning. In: Iskander, M. (eds) Innovative Techniques in Instruction Technology, E-learning, E-assessment, and Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8739-4_73

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8739-4_73

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8738-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8739-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics