Abstract
Continuous auditing has the potential to transform the existing audit paradigm from periodic reviews of a few accounting transactions to a continuous review of all transactions which thereby could vastly strengthen an organisation’s risk management and business processes. Although some continuous auditing implementations are occurring now, their adoption is slower than expected. Continuous auditing systems require that human judgement be formalised and automated which can be a complex, costly and computationally intensive endeavour. However, continuous auditing systems have similarities with emergency management and response systems which integrate continuous auditing’s detection and alerting functions with the tracking of decisions and decision options for situations that could be more effectively handled by human judgement. Emergency management and response systems could provide an effective prototype to help overcome some of the implementation obstacles that are impeding the implementation rate of continuous auditing systems.
With the goals of providing an empirical and methodological foundation for future continuous auditing systems and accelerating their rate of implementation, this chapter provides several definitions of continuous auditing, suggests possible architectures for these systems, lists some common implementation challenges and describes a few successful implementations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackoff, R.L., “Management Misinformation Systems,” Management Science 14, 4, 1967b, 147–156.
ACL, “New Demands, New Priorities The Evolving Role of Internal Audit,” 2006, URL = http://www.acl.com/PDFs/caesurvey_results06.pdf
Alles, M., G. Brennan, et al., “Continuous Monitoring of Business Process Controls: A Pilot Implementation of A Continuous Auditing System at Siemens,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7, 2, 2006a, 137–161.
Alles M., A. Kogan, M.A. Vasarhelyi, and J.D. Warren, Jr., “Audit Automation as the Foundation of Continuous Auditing,” in 16th World Continuous Auditing & Reporting Symposium. Newark: Rutgers Business School, 2008.
Alles, M.G., A. Kogan, et al., “Restoring Auditor Credibility: Tertiary Monitoring and Logging of Continuous Assurance Systems,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 5, 2, 2004, 183–202.
Alles, M.G., A. Kogan, and M. Vasarhelyi, “Continuity Equations: Analytical Monitoring of Business Processes in Continuous Auditing”, in 12th World Continuous Auditing & Reporting Symposium. Newark: Rutgers Business School, 2006b.
ANSI/IEEE, Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems, 23, 2000.
Bailey James, S.W.P., “Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction,” Management Science, 29, 4, 1983, 17.
Chan, S.Y., “The Use of Graphs as Decision Aids in Relation to Information Overload and Managerial decision quality,” Journal of Information Science, 27, 6, 2001, 417–426.
Chewning, E.G. and A.M. Harrell, “The Effect of Information Load on Decision Makers’ Cue Utilization Levels and Decision Quality in A Financial Distress Decision Task,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15, 6, 1990, 527–542.
CICA/AICPA, Continuous Auditing, Research Report. T. C. I. o. C. Accountants, Toronto, 1999.
Coakley, J.R., “Using Pattern Analysis Methods to Supplement Attention Directing Analytical Procedures,” Expert Systems with Applications, 9, 4, 1995, 513–528.
Coderre, D., Global Technology Audit Guide Continuous Auditing: Implications for Assurance, Monitoring, and Risk Assessment, http://www.acl.com/pdfs/IIA_GTAG-May05.pdf44, 2005.
Coderre, D., “A Continuous View of Accounts,” Internal Auditor, 63, 2, 2006, 25–31.
Cook, G.J., “An Empirical Investigation of Information Search Strategies with Implications for Decision Support System Design,” Decision Sciences, 24, 1993, 683–699.
Curtis, M.B., “Bottom-up Innovation – A Study of Intrepreneurship in Organizations,” in 19th World Continuous Auditing & Reporting Symposium. Newark: Rutgers Business School, 2009.
Davis, J.T., A.P. Massey, et al., “Supporting a Complex Audit Judgment Task: An Expert Network Approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, 103, 2, 1997, 350–372.
Denton, D.K., “Better Decisions,” Industrial Management, 43, 4, 2001, 21.
Edmunds, A. and A. Morris, “The Problem of Information Overload in Business Organisations: A Review of the Literature,” International Journal of Information Management, 20, 1, 2000,17–28.
Fedorowicz, J., “Managing Risk through Financial Processes: Embedding Governance, Risk and Compliance,” The Economist, 23, 2008.
Fischer, M.J., ‘“Real-izing’ The Benefits of New Technologies as a Source of Audit Evidence: An Interpretive Field Study,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 2–3, 1996, 219–242.
Geldermann, J., V. Bertsch, et al., “Multi-criteria Decision Support and Evaluation of Strategies for Nuclear Remediation Management,” Omega, 37, 1, 2009, 238–251.
Grise, M.-L. and R.B. Gallupe, “Information Overload: Addressing the Productivity Paradox in Face-to-Face Electronic Meetings,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 3, 1999, 157–185.
Groomer, S.M. and U.S. Murthy, “Continuous Auditing of Database Applications: An Embedded Audit Module Approach,” Journal of Information Systems, 3, 2, 1989, 53.
Hall, B. and B. Khan, Adoption of New Technology, vol. 22. Berkeley: University of California Department of Economics, 2003.
Helms, G.L., J.M. Mancino, et al., “Information Technology Issues for the Attest, Audit, and Assurance Services Functions,” CPA Journal, 69, 5, 1999, 62.
Hiltz, S.R. and M. Turoff, “Structuring Computer-Mediated Communication Systems to Avoid Information Overload,” Communications of ACM, 28, 7, 1985, 680–689.
Hoxmeier, J.A.D. and C. DiCesare, “System Response Time and User Satisfaction: An Experimental Study of Browser-Based Applications,” in Proceedings of the Association of Information Systems Americas Conference, Long Beach, 2000.
Jacoby, J., D.E. Speller, et al., “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load: Replication and Extension,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 1, 1974, 33–42.
Krass, P., “The Never-ending Audit,” CFO, 18, 10, 2002, 25.
McCann, D., “Internal Audit: The Continuous Conundrum,” 2009, URL = http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/14440838
Murthy, U.S., “An Analysis of the Effects of Continuous Monitoring Controls on e-Commerce System Performance,” Journal of Information Systems, 18, 2, 2004, 29–47.
Olsen, K.A., K.M. Sochats, et al., “Full Text Searching and Information Overload,” The International Information & Library Review, 30, 2, 1998, 105–122.
Redgrave, J., A. Prasad, J. Fliegel, T. Hiser, and C. Ragan, The SEDONA Principles: Best Practices Recommendations & Principles for Addressing Electronic Document Production. The SEDONA Conference, 2005.
Rezaee, Z.R.E. and A. Sharbatoghlie, “Continuous Auditing: The Audit of the Future,” Managerial Auditing Journal, 16, 3, 2001, 150–158.
Srivastava, R.P. and G.R. Shafer, “Belief-Function Formulas for Audit Risk,” Accounting Review, 67, 2, 1992, 249–283.
Turoff, M., M. Chumer, S.R. Hiltz, R. Klashner, M. Alles, M. Vasarhelyi, and A. Kogan, “Assuring Homeland Security: Continuous Monitoring, Control and Assurance of Emergency Preparedness,” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 6, 3, 2004, 24.
Turoff, M.C., M. de Walle, B. Van, and Y. Xiang, “The Design of a Dynamic Emergency Response Management Information System (DERMIS),” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 5, 4, 2003.
Vasarhelyi, M.A., M.G. Alles, and A. Kogan, Principles of Analytic Monitoring for Continuous Assurance, 1, 2004.
Vasarhelyi, M.A. and F.B. Halper, “The Continuous Audit of Online Systems,” Auditing, 10, 1, 1991, 110–125.
Venkatesh, V., M.G. Morris, et al., “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, 27, 3, 2003, 425–478.
Warren, D., “Continuous Financial Controls Review Processes,” Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Journal, 2005.
Warren, D. and X. Parker, Continuous Auditing: Potential for Internal Auditors, The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, http://www.amazon.com/Continuous-Auditing-Potential-Internal-Auditors/dp/0894135155 2003.
Weick, K. and K. Sutcliffe, Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
Woodroof, J. and D. Searcy, “Continuous Audit: Model Development and Implementation Within a Debt Covenant Compliance Domain,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2, 3, 2001, 169–191.
Ye, H., S. Chen, F. Gao, and Y. He, “SOA-based Conceptual Model for Continuous Auditing: A Discussion,” in 7th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer & Applied Computational Science (ACACOS ‘08), Hangzhou, 2008.
Acknowledgement from Robert Baksa
I would like to thank Edison Properties L.L.C. and Gupton Marrs International for their financial support while pursuing this endeavour. I would also like to sincerely thank all my clients and colleagues for providing a challenging environment in which to grow and learn, my friends and wonderful family especially my wife, Sharon, and my two daughters, Rachel and Grace, for their continued support and encouragement, and the whole NJIT Information Systems Department, especially Professors Turoff and Hiltz, whose insight, patience and guidance have proven invaluable. Finally, a special thanks to my empathetic listeners, inspiring supporters, savants and those helpful in enabling research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baksa, R., Turoff, M. (2011). Continuous Auditing as a Foundation for Real Time Decision Support: Implementation Challenges and Successes. In: Burstein, F., Brézillon, P., Zaslavsky, A. (eds) Supporting Real Time Decision-Making. Annals of Information Systems, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7406-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7406-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7405-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7406-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)