Abstract
To satisfy a fluctuating demand and achieve a high level of quality and service, companies must take into account several features when designing new products in order to become or remain market leaders. When a single company is unable to meet this objective alone, it is appropriate for it to join its actions with other companies. The product design consists of the complex task to select from various potential actions that allowing the fulfilment of several requirements: functional, technical, environmental, economic, security, etc. Furthermore, the task is even more difficult when actions are related to distinct services or companies that do not necessarily know the capacities of each others which makes complex the coordination of joint actions. Interactions between services may be affected by antagonist personal interests.
Based on a multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework and a fuzzy model that links actions to the satisfaction of objectives, this paper proposes to treat two extreme views related to the collective selection of the necessary actions to design a product: (1) The first point of view corresponds to an ideal situation where each service reveals its capacities and the unique objective is to succeed in the realization of the common goal; (2) the second point of view corresponds to a more realistic situation where only necessary information for the progress of collective action are shared and where collective and personal goals coexist and are to be taken into account. The first situation corresponds to a classical case where a single decision maker (DM) has to express his preferences then a classical optimization problem under constraints has to be solved in order to efficiently select actions. In the second situation the services do not share the same preferences and each service wants to maximize its gain, in this case we propose to build a negotiated solution between services.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dyer, J.S.: Multiattribute utility theory (MAUT). In: Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. ISOR, vol. 233, pp. 285–314. Springer, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_8
Grabisch, M., Greco, S., Pirlot, M.: Bipolar and bivariate models in multicriteria decision analysis: descriptive and constructive approaches. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(9), 930–969 (2008)
Greco, S., Figueira, J., Ehrgott, M.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/b100605
Imoussaten, A., Montmain, J., Trousset, F., Labreuche, C.: Multi-criteria improvement of options. In: European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, p. 1 (2011)
Imoussaten, A., Trousset, F., Montmain, J.: Improving performances in a company when collective strategy comes up against individual interests. In: EUSFLAT Conference, pp. 904–911 (2011)
Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decision analysis with multiple conflicting objectives. In: Decision with Multiple Objectives. Wiley, New York (1976)
Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Suppes, P., Tversky, A.: Foundations of Measurement (Additive And Polynomial Representations), vol. 1. Academic Press, New York (1971)
Montmain, J., Labreuche, C., Imoussaten, A., Trousset, F.: Multi-criteria improvement of complex systems. Inf. Sci. 291, 61–84 (2015)
Pignon, J.P., Labreuche, Ch.: A methodological approach for operational and technical experimentation based evaluation of systems of systems architectures. In: International Conference on Software & Systems Engineering and their Applications (ICSSEA), Paris, France, 4–6 December 2007 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Imoussaten, A. (2018). An Approach Based on MCDA and Fuzzy Logic to Select Joint Actions. In: Ciucci, D., Pasi, G., Vantaggi, B. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11142. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00461-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00461-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00460-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00461-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)