Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

ICSH 2018: LSTM based Sentiment Analysis for Patient Experience Narratives in E-survey Tools

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Health (ICSH 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10983))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Background: Analysis of patient experience narratives is helpful to improve care service and to promote patient satisfaction. As more and more E-survey tools went on line, a huge amount of patient comments has become a challenge to analysts. Sentiment analysis is a fully explored machine learning method to classify texts according their sentimental orientation. However, it is seldom applied to the analysis of patient comments, especially in China. Objectives: This paper aims to test the performance of the classical sentiment analysis methods and find an applicable solution of Chinese patient experience narratives analysis. Data: 20,000 patient experience narratives are collected from two hospital’s E-survey tools, a mobile patient follow-up system and a WeChat App of patient comments. Methods: Five machine learning methods, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forests (RF), Gradient Boost Decision Tree (GBDT), XGBoost and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), are used to explore the sentiment analysis performance of Chinese patient comments. χ2 statistics is used for feature selection. And Skip-gram model is used for word-embedding. Results: The experiment results showed that LSTM achieved much better performance than SVM did. The F-Measure values of LSTM for positive category and negative category are both 98.87, which is better than other traditional machine learning methods. Conclusion: The result of this paper suggests that LSTM based sentiment analysis is a practical method to exploit the ever-increasing patient experience narratives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Abri, R., Al-Balushi, A.: Patient satisfaction survey as a tool towards quality improvement. Oman Med. J. 29, 3 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zgierska, A., Rabago, D., Miller, M.M.: Impact of patient satisfaction ratings on physicians and clinical care. Patient Prefer. Adherence 8, 437 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boos, J., et al.: Electronic kiosks for patient satisfaction survey in radiology. Am. J. Roentgenol. 208, 577–584 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McPeake, J., Bateson, M., O’Neill, A.: Electronic surveys: how to maximise success. Nurse Res. (2014+) 21, 24 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Repplinger, M.D., et al.: The impact of an emergency department front-end redesign on patient-reported satisfaction survey results. West. J. Emerg. Med. 18, 1068 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gillespie, A., Reader, T.W.: The healthcare complaints analysis tool: development and reliability testing of a method for service monitoring and organisational learning. BMJ Qual. Saf. 25, 937–946 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reader, T.W., Gillespie, A., Roberts, J.: Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ Qual. Saf. 23, 678–689 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamouda, A.E.-D.A., El-taher, F.E.-Z.: Sentiment analyzer for arabic comments system. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 4, 99–103 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shamshurin, I.: Data representation in machine learning-based sentiment analysis of customer reviews. In: Kuznetsov, S.O., Mandal, D.P., Kundu, M.K., Pal, S.K. (eds.) PReMI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6744, pp. 254–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21786-9_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeb, S., Qamar, U., Hussain, F.: Sentiment analysis on user reviews through lexicon and rule-based approach. In: Morishima, A., et al. (eds.) APWeb 2016. LNCS, vol. 9865, pp. 55–63. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45835-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Alemi, F., Torii, M., Clementz, L., Aron, D.C.: Feasibility of real-time satisfaction surveys through automated analysis of patients’ unstructured comments and sentiments. Qual. Manag. Healthc. 21, 9–19 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Greaves, F., Ramirez-Cano, D., Millett, C., Darzi, A., Donaldson, L.: Use of sentiment analysis for capturing patient experience from free-text comments posted online. J. Med. Internet Res. 15, e239 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hopper, A.M., Uriyo, M.: Using sentiment analysis to review patient satisfaction data located on the internet. J. Health Organ. Manag. 29, 221–233 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elmessiry, A., Cooper, W.O., Catron, T.F., Karrass, J., Zhang, Z., Singh, M.P.: Triaging patient complaints: monte carlo cross-validation of six machine learning classifiers. JMIR Med. Inform. 5, e19 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tang, D., Qin, B., Liu, T.: Deep learning for sentiment analysis: successful approaches and future challenges. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 5, 292–303 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gräbner, D., Zanker, M., Fliedl, G., Fuchs, M.: Classification of customer reviews based on sentiment analysis. na (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Z., Ye, Q., Zhang, Z., Li, Y.: Sentiment classification of Internet restaurant reviews written in Cantonese. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 7674–7682 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, D., Xu, H., Su, Z., Xu, Y.: Chinese comments sentiment classification based on word2vec and SVMperf. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 1857–1863 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mouthami, K., Devi, K.N., Bhaskaran, V.M.: Sentiment analysis and classification based on textual reviews. In: 2013 international conference on Information communication and embedded systems (ICICES), pp. 271–276. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ElMessiry, A., Zhang, Z., Cooper, W.O., Catron, T.F., Karrass, J., Singh, M.P.: Leveraging sentiment analysis for classifying patient complaints. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics - ACM-BCB 2017, pp. 44–51 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ayata, D., Saraçlar, M., Özgür, A.: Political opinion/sentiment prediction via long short term memory recurrent neural networks on Twitter. In: 2017 25th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Romanowski, A., Skuza, M.: Towards predicting stock price moves with aid of sentiment analysis of Twitter social network data and big data processing environment. In: Pełech-Pilichowski, T., Mach-Król, M., Olszak, C.M. (eds.) Advances in Business ICT: New Ideas from Ongoing Research. SCI, vol. 658, pp. 105–123. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47208-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY and Data Mining, pp. 168–177. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ding, X., Liu, B., Yu, P.S.: A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 231–240. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stone, P.J., Dunphy, D.C., Smith, M.S.: The general inquirer: a computer approach to content analysis (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E., Booth, R.J.: Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. 71, 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: Sentiwordnet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREC, pp. 2200–2204 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S.: Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the ACL-02 Conference on Empirical methods in Natural Language Processing-Volume 10, pp. 79–86. Association for Computational Linguistics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dave, K., Lawrence, S., Pennock, D.M.: Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 519–528. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mullen, T., Collier, N.: Sentiment analysis using support vector machines with diverse information sources. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mikolov, T.: Statistical language models based on neural networks. Presentation at Google, Mountain View, 2nd April 2012

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R., Vincent, P., Jauvin, C.: A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1137–1155 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Poria, S., Cambria, E., Gelbukh, A.: Aspect extraction for opinion mining with a deep convolutional neural network. Knowl.-Based Syst. 108, 42–49 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ganin, Y., et al.: Domain-adversarial training of neural networks. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 17, 1–35 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Chau, N.P., Phan, V.A., Le Nguyen, M.: Deep learning and sub-tree mining for document level sentiment classification. In: 2016 Eighth International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE), pp. 268–273. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. del Arco, F.M.P., Valdivia, M.T.M., Zafra, S.M.J., González, M.D.M., Cámara, E.M.: COPOS: corpus of patient opinions in Spanish. Application of sentiment analysis techniques. Proces. Leng. Nat. 57, 83–90 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, H.-P., Yu, H.-K., Xiong, D.-Y., Liu, Q.: HHMM-based Chinese lexical analyzer ICTCLAS. In: Proceedings of the Second SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing-Volume 17, pp. 184–187. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  38. http://cmesh.imicams.ac.cn/index.action?action=index. Accessed 01 Apr 2018

  39. 来斯惟: 基于神经网络的词和文档语义向量表示方法研究. 中国科学院大学 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297 (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Liaw, A., Wiener, M.: Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2, 18–22 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Friedman, J.H.: Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29, 1189–1232 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 785–794. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Galavotti, L., Sebastiani, F., Simi, M.: Experiments on the use of feature selection and negative evidence in automated text categorization. In: Borbinha, J., Baker, T. (eds.) ECDL 2000. LNCS, vol. 1923, pp. 59–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45268-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Caropreso, M.F., Matwin, S., Sebastiani, F.: A learner-independent evaluation of the usefulness of statistical phrases for automated text categorization. In: Text databases and Document Management: Theory and practice, vol. 5478, pp. 78–102 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sebastiani, F., Sperduti, A., Valdambrini, N.: An improved boosting algorithm and its application to text categorization. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 78–85. ACM (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manag. 24, 513–523 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kinga, D., Adam, J.B.: A method for stochastic optimization. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Li, J., Xu, H., He, X., Deng, J., Sun, X.: Tweet modeling with LSTM recurrent neural networks for hashtag recommendation. In: 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1570–1577. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Uysal, A.K., Murphey, Y.L.: Sentiment classification: feature selection based approaches versus deep learning. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT), pp. 23–30. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingdong Ma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Xia, C., Zhao, D., Wang, J., Liu, J., Ma, J. (2018). ICSH 2018: LSTM based Sentiment Analysis for Patient Experience Narratives in E-survey Tools. In: Chen, H., Fang, Q., Zeng, D., Wu, J. (eds) Smart Health. ICSH 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10983. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03649-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03649-2_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03648-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03649-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics