Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Predicting the Degree of Collaboration of Researchers on Co-authorship Social Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 923))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1453 Accesses

Abstract

Academic social networks play a role in establishing the research collaboration by connecting researchers with each other in order to allow them sharing their professional knowledge and evaluating the performance of each individual researcher. In this paper, we mine the academic co-authorship social network in order to predict the potential degree of collaboration for each individual researcher on that network. Where predicting the degree of collaboration for each individual researcher is considered as one of the indicators for evaluating his/her potential performance. The main approach of this paper relies on using the sum of link weights specified by the total number of papers that each researcher has published with other co-authors in order to identify his/her initial degree of collaboration on the co-authorship network. This is achieved by collecting the total of link weights that each researcher has with others on the co-authorship network. Next, the obtained values of collaboration degree are used with other features extracted from the co-authorship dataset to train a supervised-learning regression model in the training phase. Consequently, the learning regression model will be able to predict potential degree of collaboration for every individual researchers on the co-authorship network in the test phase. Empirical experiments are conducted on a publicly available weighted academic co-authorship networks. The evaluation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. It achieves a high performance in predicting the potential degree of collaboration of every researcher on the co-authorship network with 0.46 root mean square error (RMSE) using the linear regression model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The A-index is used to compute the weighted total of peer-reviewed publications and journal impact factors C- and P-indexes that refers to the collaboration and productivity, respectively. More information about A-index, is available at [16].

References

  1. Extraction and Mining of Academic Social Networks. https://aminer.org/aminernetwork

  2. Newman, M.: Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press Inc., New York (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Konstas, I., Stathopoulos, V., Jose, J.M.: On social networks and collaborative recommendation. In: Proceeding of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2009), pp. 195–202 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., Su, Z.: ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 990–998 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Sa, H.R., Prudencio, R.B.C.: Supervised link prediction in weighted networks. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Newman, M.E.J.: Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. PNAS 101(Suppl. 1), 5200–5205 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sameer Kumar Co-authorship networks: A review of the literature. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 67(1), 55–73 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ioannidis, J.P.A.: Measuring co-authorship and networking-adjusted scientific impact. PLOS ONE 3(7), e2778 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parish, A.J., Boyack, K.W., Ioannidis, J.P.A.: Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research. PLOS ONE 13(1), e0189742 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hagan, R., Feng, Y., Bush, J.: Centrality Metrics. University of Tennessee, Knoxville (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bordons, M., Aparicio, J., Gonzáalez-Albo, B., Diaz-Faes, A.A.: The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks in three fields. J. Inf. 9(1), 135–144 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., Hossain, L.: Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: a correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. J. Inf. 5(4), 594–607 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., Hwang, J.: Evaluating scholars based on their academic collaboration activities: two indices, the RC-index and the CC-index, for quantifying collaboration activities of researchers and scientific communities. Scientometrics 83(1), 1–13 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, S., Bozeman, B.: The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Soc. Stud. Sci. J. 35(5), 673–702 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ponomariova, B.L., Boardman, C.: Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: university research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Res. Policy J. 39(5), 613–624 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stallings, J., et al.: Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110(24), 9680–9685 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. The R Project for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/

  18. Software Foundation: Python Language Reference, version 2.7. http://www.python.org

  19. WEKA Manual for Version 3-6-8. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A., Talwalkar, A.: Foundations of Machine Learning. MIT Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. http://statweb.stanford.edu/~susan/courses/s60/split/node60.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doaa Hassan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hassan, D. (2020). Predicting the Degree of Collaboration of Researchers on Co-authorship Social Networks. In: Madureira, A., Abraham, A., Gandhi, N., Varela, M. (eds) Hybrid Intelligent Systems. HIS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 923. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14347-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics