Abstract
Nowadays, hackathons have become a popular way of bringing people together to engage in brief, intensive collaborative work. Despite being a brief activity, being collocated with team members and focused on a task—radical collocation—could improve collaboration of scientific software teams. Using a mixed-methods study of participants who attended two hackathons at Space Telescope Science Institute, we examined how hackathons can facilitate collaboration in scientific software teams which typically involve members from two different disciplines: science and software engineering. We found that hackathons created a focused interruption-free working environment in which team members were able to assess each other’s skills, focus together on a single project and leverage opportunities to exchange knowledge with other collocated participants, thereby allowing technical work to advance more efficiently. This study suggests “hacking” as a new and productive form of collaborative work in scientific software production.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Major League Hacking, MLH. https://mlh.io.
- 2.
Astro Hack Week. http://astrohackweek.org/2018/.
- 3.
The Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy. http://www.stsci.edu/institute/.
References
Bos, N., et al.: From shared databases to communities of practice: a taxonomy of collaboratories. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 12, 652–672 (2007)
Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 4th edn. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2014)
Crowston, K., Howison, J., Masango, C., Eseryel, Y.: Face-to-face interactions in self-organizing distributed teams. In: Presentation at the OCIS Division, Academy of Management Conference (2005). http://floss.syr.edu/StudyP/ftf2005.pdf
Greeno, J.G.: Gibson’s affordances. Psychol. Rev. 101(2), 336–342 (1994)
Hatton, L., Roberts, A.: How accurate is scientific software? IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 20, 785–797 (1994)
Heaton, D., Carver, J.C.: Claims about the use of software engineering practices in science: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 67, 207–219 (2015). Carver
Henderson, S.: Getting the most out of hackathons for social good. In: Rosenthal, R.J. (ed.) Volunteer Engagement 2.0: Ideas and Insights Changing the World, pp. 182–194 (2015)
Hinds, P.J., Cramton, C.D.: Situated coworker familiarity: how site visits transform relationships among distributed workers. Organ. Sci. 25, 794–814 (2013)
Howison, J., Herbsleb, J.D.: Scientific software production: incentives and collaboration. In: The ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 513–522. ACM, New York (2011)
Kelly, D.: Scientific software development viewed as knowledge acquisition: towards understanding the development of risk-averse scientific software. J. Syst. Softw. 109, 50–61 (2015)
Komssi, M., Pichlis, D., Raatikainen, M., Kindström, K., Järvinen, J.: What are hackathons for? IEEE Softw. 32, 60–67 (2015)
Kraut, R.E., Streeter, L.A.: Coordination in large scale software development. Commun. ACM 38, 69–81 (1995)
Möller, S., et al.: Community-driven development for computational biology at sprints, hackathons and codefests. BMC Bioinf. 15, S7 (2014)
Olson, G.M., Olson, J.S.: Distance matters. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 15, 139–178 (2000)
Paine, D., Lee, C.P.: Who has plots? Contextualizing scientific software, practice, and visualizations. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. 1, 21 (2017). Article 85
Segal, J.: Scientists and software engineers: a tale of two cultures. In: The 20th Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, PPIG 2008, University of Lancaster, UK (2008)
Stoltzfus, A., et al.: Community and code: nine lessons from nine NESCent Hackathons. F1000Research 6 (2017)
Teasley, S., Covi, L., Krishnan, M.S., Olson, J.S.: How does radical collocation help a team succeed? In: The 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 339–346, ACM, New York (2000)
Trainer, E.H., Kalyanasundaram, A., Chaihirunkarn, C., Herbsleb, J.D.: How to hackathon: socio-technical tradeoffs in brief, intensive collocation. In: The 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1118–1130. ACM, New York (2016)
Wyngaard, J., Lynch, H., Nabrzyski, J., Pope, A., Jha, S.: Hacking at the divide between polar science and HPC: using hackathons as training tools. In: 2017 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW), pp. 352–359. IEEE (2017)
Zhang, Z.-X., Hempel, P.S., Han, Y.-L., Tjosvold, D.: Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 92, 1722 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pe-Than, E.P.P., Herbsleb, J.D. (2019). Understanding Hackathons for Science: Collaboration, Affordances, and Outcomes. In: Taylor, N., Christian-Lamb, C., Martin, M., Nardi, B. (eds) Information in Contemporary Society. iConference 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11420. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15741-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15742-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)