Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Learning from Deep Representations of Multiple Networks for Predicting Drug–Target Interactions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Computing Theories and Application (ICIC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11644))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Many computational approaches have been developed to predict drug-target interactions (DTIs) based on the use of different similarity networks that connect drugs and targets. However, such approaches do not fully exploit all the information available in all similarity networks which can be considered as multiple domain representations of DTIs. As more comprehensive understanding of the latent knowledge underlying the DTI networks requires combining insights obtained from multiple, diverse networks, there is a need for a computational approach to be developed to learn hidden patterns from multiple DTI networks simultaneously for more complete understanding of DTIs. In this paper, we propose such an approached based on a deep multiple DTI network fusion algorithm, called DDTF. to take into consideration all relevant DTI networks. With this DDTF, the identification of DTIs can be made more effective. The DDTF performs its tasks in several steps. Given a set of complex heterogeneous networks, DDTF first uses the network completion algorithm to reconstruct the data representation information to obtain the best network description. To do so, a matrix factorization technique is first used. Based on this approach, the networks obtained from multiple domains are first represented by several similarity matrices and the feature vectors of each pair of drug and protein of the DTI networks are obtained. With these features and representations, we introduce here a novel approach based on non-negative matrix factorization to rescale similarity networks to ensure that the data are reliable. DDTF algorithm constructs a new network to represent the similarity between two vertices. The new similarity network is calculated from the heterogeneous information embedded by a new fusion algorithm. As a final step, DDTF finds a deep representation of each drug or protein in the fused network and use such information for the inference of DTIs. Given the fused deep representations, DDTF can discover optimal projection from a drug network onto a target network. The DDTF algorithm has been tested with real data and experimental results show that DDTF outperforms sophisticated network integration approaches and others significantly. Based on the experiments, it is discovered that the network representation inferred by DDTF has a higher correlation than those yielded by previous work. Moreover, it is noted that completing similarity network based on known networks is a promising direction for drug-target predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mullard, A.: New drugs cost US 2.6 billion to develop. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13(12), 877 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scannell, J., et al.: Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11, 191–200 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Breuza, L., et al.: UniProt consortium. The UniProtKB guide to the human proteome. Database. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Law, V., et al.: DrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res. 42(D1), D1091–D1097 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Günther, S., et al.: Super target and matador: resources for exploring drug-target relationships. Nucleic Acids Res. 36(suppl 1), D919–D922 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, X., Ji, Z.L., Chen, Y.Z.: TTD: therapeutic target database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30(1), 412–415 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, A.P., et al.: The comparative toxicogenomics database: update 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(D1), D1104–D1114 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhn, M., Campillos, M., Letunic, I., Jensen, L.J., Bork, P.: A side effect resource to capture phenotypic effects of drugs. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6(1), 343 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ding, H., Takigawa, I., Mamitsuka, H., Zhu, S.: Similarity-based machine learning methods for predicting drug–target interactions: a brief review. Brief. Bioinform. bbt056 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, L., You, Z.H., Chen, X., Yan, X., Liu, G., Zhang, W.: RFDT: a rotation forest-based predictor for predicting drug-target interactions using drug structure and protein sequence information. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 19(5), 445–454 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu, P.W., Chan, K.C.C., You, Z.H.: Large-scale prediction of drug-target interactions from deep representations. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Vancouver, Canada, 24–29 July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luo, X., Ming, Z., You, Z., Li, S., Xia, Y., Leung, H.: Improving network topology-based protein interactome mapping via collaborative filtering. Knowl.-Based Syst. 90, 23–32 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, X., et al.: Drug–target interaction prediction: databases, web servers and computational models. Brief. Bioinform. 17, bbv066 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yamanishi, Y., Araki, M., Gutteridge, A., et al.: Prediction of drug-target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces. Bioinformatics 24(13), i232–i240 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, X., Liu, M.X., Yan, G.Y.: Drug–target interaction prediction by random walk on the heterogeneous network. Mol. BioSyst. 8(7), 1970–1978 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng, F., et al.: Prediction of drug-target interactions and drug repositioning via network-based inference. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8(5), e1002503 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, B., et al.: Similarity network fusion for aggregating data types on a genomic scale. Nat. Methods 11(3), 333–337 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu, A.L., Chan, K.C.C.: Utilizing both topological and attribute information for protein complex identification in PPI networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 10(3), 780–792 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cao, D.-S., et al.: Large-scale prediction of drug–target interactions using protein sequences and drug topological structures. Anal. Chim. Acta 752, 1–10 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu, P., Chan, K.C., Hu, Y.: Predicting drug-target interactions based on small positive samples. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 19(5), 479–487 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hattori, M., Okuno, Y., Goto, S., Kanehisa, M.: Heuristics for chemical compound matching. Genome Inform. Ser. 14, 144–153 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, H., et al.: A systematic prediction of multiple drug-target interactions from chemical, genomic, and pharmacological data. PLoS One 7(5), e37608 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gönen, M.: Predicting drug–target interactions from chemical and genomic kernels using Bayesian matrix factorization. Bioinformatics 28(18), 2304–2310 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lan, W., et al.: Predicting drug-target interaction using positive-unlabeled learning. Neurocomputing 206, 50–57 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.03.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamanishi, Y., Kotera, M., Moriya, Y., Sawada, R., Kanehisa, M., Goto, S.: DINIES: drug–target interaction network inference engine based on supervised analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42(W1), W39–W45 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Takarabe, M., Kotera, M., Nishimura, Y., Goto, S., Yamanishi, Y.: Drug target prediction using adverse event report systems: a pharmacogenomic approach. Bioinformatics 28(18), i611–i618 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Luo, Y., et al.: A network integration approach for drug-target interaction prediction and computational drug repositioning from heterogeneous information. Nat. Commun. 8, 573 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, D.D., Seung, H.S.: Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401(6755), 788 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, D.D., Seung, H.S.: Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 556–562 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tian, F., Gao, B., Cui, Q., Chen, E., Liu, T.-Y.: Learning Deep Representations for Graph Clustering. In: AAAI, pp. 1293–1299 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bengio, Y., et al.: Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 19, p. 153 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Natarajan, N., Dhillon, I.S.: Inductive matrix completion for predicting gene–disease associations. Bioinformatics 30(12), i60–i68 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Keshava Prasad, T.S., et al.: Human protein reference database—2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 37(suppl_1), 767–772 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Huang, J., Ling, C.X.: Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17(3), 299–310 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhuhong You or Lun Hu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hu, P. et al. (2019). Learning from Deep Representations of Multiple Networks for Predicting Drug–Target Interactions. In: Huang, DS., Jo, KH., Huang, ZK. (eds) Intelligent Computing Theories and Application. ICIC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11644. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26969-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26969-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26968-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26969-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics