Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Causality Discovery with Domain Knowledge for Drug-Drug Interactions Discovery

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Data Mining and Applications (ADMA 2019)

Abstract

Bayesian Network Probabilistic Graphs have recently been applied to the problem of discovery drug-drug interactions, i.e., the identification of drugs that, when consumed together, produce an unwanted side effect. These methods have the advantage of being explainable: the cause of the interaction is made explicit. However, they suffer from two intrinsic problems: (1) the high time-complexity for computing causation, i.e., exponential; and (2) the difficult identification of causality directions, i.e., it is difficult to identify in drug-drug interactions databases whether a drug causes an adverse effect – or vice versa, an adverse effect causes a drug consumption. While solutions for addressing the causality direction identification exist, e.g., the CARD method, these assume statistical independence between drug pairs considered for interaction: real data often does not satisfy this condition.

In this paper, we propose a novel causality discovery algorithm for drug-drug interactions that goes beyond these limitations: Domain-knowledge-driven Causality Discovery (DCD). In DCD, a knowledge base that contains known drug-side effect pairs is used to prime a greedy drug-drug interaction algorithm that detects the drugs that, when consumed together, cause a side effect. This algorithm resolves the drug-drug interaction discovery problem in \(O(n^2)\) time and provides the causal direction of combined causes and their effect, without resorting to assuming statistical independence of drugs intake. Comprehensive experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets show the proposed method is more effective and efficient than current state-of-the-art solutions, while also addressing a number of drawbacks of current solutions, including the high time complexity, and the strong assumptions regarding real-world data that are often violated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States has collected this type of data in the FDA Adverse Event Report System (FAERS).

  2. 2.

    The causal relationship whose direction is unknown.

  3. 3.

    The V-structure property, in fact, may not identify all causality structures in real-world DDICAE data [18], although it can identify the direction in causality discovery.

  4. 4.

    The relationship describing the causes that are marginally independent become dependent when their common effect is given.

  5. 5.

    https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/.

  6. 6.

    MedicinesComplete published in Pharmaceutical Press and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society: https://www.medicinescomplete.com/mc/alerts/current/drug-interactions.htm.

  7. 7.

    Data sources from Micromedex, Multum and Wolters Kluwer databases: https://www.drugs.com/drug_interactions.php.

  8. 8.

    http://www.phil.cmu.edu/tetrad/.

References

  1. Aliferis, C.F., Statnikov, A., Tsamardinos, I., Mani, S., Koutsoukos, X.D.: Local causal and Markov blanket induction for causal discovery and feature selection for classification part i: algorithms and empirical evaluation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11(Jan), 171–234 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Banda, J.M., Evans, L., Vanguri, R.S., Tatonetti, N.P., Ryan, P.B., Shah, N.H.: A curated and standardized adverse drug event resource to accelerate drug safety research. Sci. Data 3, 160026 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cai, R., et al.: Identification of adverse drug-drug interactions through causal association rule discovery from spontaneous adverse event reports. Artif. Intell. Med. 76, 7–15 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chickering, D.M., Heckerman, D., Meek, C.: Large-sample learning of Bayesian networks is NP-hard. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5(Oct), 1287–1330 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen, M.L., et al.: Risk of bleeding with single, dual, or triple therapy with warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch. Intern. Med. 170(16), 1433–1441 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harpaz, R., Perez, H., Chase, H.S., Rabadan, R., Hripcsak, G., Friedman, C.: Biclustering of adverse drug events in the FDA’s spontaneous reporting system. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 89(2), 243–250 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. He, L., Yang, Z., Lin, H., Li, Y.: Drug name recognition in biomedical texts: a machine-learning-based method. Drug Discov. Today 19(5), 610–617 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin, Z., Li, J., Liu, L., Le, T.D., Sun, B., Wang, R.: Discovery of causal rules using partial association. In: IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 309–318. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lazarou, J., Pomeranz, B.H., Corey, P.N.: Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 279(15), 1200–1205 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, J., Le, T.D., Liu, L., Liu, J., Jin, Z., Sun, B.: Mining causal association rules. In: IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining (Workshops), pp. 114–123. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, J., Ma, S., Le, T., Liu, L., Liu, J.: Causal decision trees. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29(2), 257–271 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McHugh, M.L.: The chi-square test of independence. Biochem. Med. : Biochem. Med. 23(2), 143–149 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Neapolitan, R.E., et al.: Learning Bayesian Networks, vol. 38. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norén, G.N., Orre, R., Bate, A., Edwards, I.R.: Duplicate detection in adverse drug reaction surveillance. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 14(3), 305–328 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Pearl, J.: Causality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Qin, X., Kakar, T., Wunnava, S., Rundensteiner, E.A., Cao, L.: MARAS: signaling multi-drug adverse reactions. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1615–1623. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quinn, D., Day, R.: Drug interactions of clinical importance. Drug Saf. 12(6), 393–452 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodrigues, A.D.: Drug-Drug Interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Van Puijenbroek, E.P., Egberts, A.C., Meyboom, R.H., Leufkens, H.G.: Signalling possible drug-drug interactions in a spontaneous reporting system: delay of withdrawal bleeding during concomitant use of oral contraceptives and itraconazole. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 47(6), 689–693 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Waldmann, M.R., Martignon, L.: A Bayesian network model of causal learning. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1102–1107 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Meng Wang from Southeast University, China, and Mingyang Zhong from The University of Queensland, Australia, for their input on the initial stages of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sitthichoke Subpaiboonkit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix I: Terminology used in this Paper

Appendix I: Terminology used in this Paper

  • BCC: Bayesian Constraint-based Causality

  • CARD: Causal Association Rule Discovery

  • CBN: Causal Bayesian Network

  • DCD: Domain-knowledge-driven Causality Discovery

  • DDICAE: Drug-Drug Interactions Causing Adverse Effects

  • DDI: Drug-drug interactions

  • FAERS: Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event report system

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Subpaiboonkit, S., Li, X., Zhao, X., Scells, H., Zuccon, G. (2019). Causality Discovery with Domain Knowledge for Drug-Drug Interactions Discovery. In: Li, J., Wang, S., Qin, S., Li, X., Wang, S. (eds) Advanced Data Mining and Applications. ADMA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11888. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35231-8_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35231-8_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35230-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35231-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics