Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Formal Ontology in a Relativistic Setting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Metadata and Semantic Research (MTSR 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1057))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 787 Accesses

Abstract

Ontologies are supposed to address the problem of making information systems’ conceptual models shareable and understandable. Most often, however, ontologies are nothing but structured lexical resources, which bring with them the classic problem behind natural language meanings: how to make sure that names and predicates are consistently interpreted all through the information sphere? Here is where formal ontology comes to play. In fact, the ‘ontological level’ [1, 3] is where, thanks to formal constraints (meaning axioms), unintended models (spurious interpretations) should be cut off. Yet, interpreting well-founded, highly formalized ontologies is far from trivial, and does not come for free. What makes ontology so difficult in practice? How to make concepts understandable and alleviate the burden of mapping strict ontological specifications with business data? This short paper will provide a brief overview on common issues when working with formal ontology and how to address them in practice, and will give some hint on effective usages of highly formalized shared conceptual models for business information systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://iaoa.org/fois/.

  2. 2.

    http://www.adampease.org/OP/.

  3. 3.

    https://ontology.com.br/.

  4. 4.

    http://basic-formal-ontology.org.

  5. 5.

    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/speech-acts/.

  6. 6.

    Aristotle. Metaphysics. I.8.

References

  1. Guarino, N.: The ontological level. In: Casati, R., Smith, B., White, G. (eds.) Philosophy and the Cognitive Science, pp. 443–456. Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vetere, G., Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures. IBM Syst. J. 44(4), 887–903 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guarino, N.: The ontological level: revisiting 30 years of knowledge representation. In: Borgida, A.T., Chaudhri, V.K., Giorgini, P., Yu, E.S. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 52–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dejnozka, J.: The Ontology of the Analytic Tradition and its Origins: Realism and Identity in Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, and Quine. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Evaluating ontological decisions with ontoclean. Commun. ACM. 45(2), 61–65 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vetere, G.: Formal ontology to the proof of facts. In: Ontology Makes Sense - Essays in honor of Nicola Guarino, PP. 152–164. IOS Press (2019). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-955-3-152

  7. Alexopoulos, P., Villazon-Terrazas, B., Pan, J.Z.: Towards vagueness-aware semantic data. In: Bobillo, F., et al. (eds.), CEUR Workshop Proceedings : 9th International Workshop on Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web, URSW 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Orman Quine, W.: Ontological Relativity and other Essays. Columbia University Press, New York City (1969)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_18

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Pustejovsky, J.: The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bezerra, C., Freitas, F., Santana da Silva, F.: Evaluating ontologies with competency questions, pp. 284–285. https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2013.199 (2013)

  12. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Vetere .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vetere, G. (2019). Formal Ontology in a Relativistic Setting. In: Garoufallou, E., Fallucchi, F., William De Luca, E. (eds) Metadata and Semantic Research. MTSR 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1057. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36599-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36599-8_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36598-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36599-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics